29 CFR 4.101 - Official rulings and interpretations in this subpart

Cite as29 CFR 4.101
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
19 practice notes
  • Increasing the Minimum Wage for Federal Contractors
    • United States
    • The Secretary Of Labor Office
    • Invalid date
    ...stakeholders with questions regarding potential SCA coverage of particular legal instruments to follow the procedures set forth in 29 CFR 4.101(g) to obtain an official ruling or interpretation as to SCA coverage. In the event that the Department is called upon to issue a coverage determina......
  • Koren v. Martin Marietta Services, Inc., Civil No. 96-1696(JP).
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. 1st Circuit. District of Puerto Rico
    • March 6, 1998
    ...for a private cause of action, or. Given the similarity of the regulatory schemes for enforcing both the SCA and the CWHSSA, compare 29 C.F.R. §§ 4.101-4.191 with 29 C.F.R. §§ 5.1-5.32 and see generally 29 C.F.R. §§ 6.1-6.57, the Court is relatively certain that such analysis would lead to ......
  • BCFS Health & Human Servs. v. United States Dep't of Labor, SA-21-CV-0776-JKP
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. 5th Circuit. Western District of Texas
    • March 17, 2022
    ...meaning and the application of provisions of the law in order to carry out their responsibilities of administration and enforcement.” 29 C.F.R. § 4.101(c). Furthermore, being remedial in nature, the SCA is intended to be applied to a wide variety of contracts, the Act does not define or lim......
  • Danielsen v. Burnside-Ott Aviation Training Center, Inc., BURNSIDE-OTT
    • United States
    • United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (District of Columbia)
    • August 16, 1991
    ...7.1-7.8 and §§ 7.11-7.18, governs the procedure and methodology for review by the Wage Appeals Board. Also, subpart C of subtitle A of 29 C.F.R. §§ 4.101-4.156 governs the "application of the McNamara-O'Hara Service Contract Act;" subpart D, §§ 4.159-4.186, governs the compensation standard......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
14 cases
  • Koren v. Martin Marietta Services, Inc., Civil No. 96-1696(JP).
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. 1st Circuit. District of Puerto Rico
    • March 6, 1998
    ...for a private cause of action, or. Given the similarity of the regulatory schemes for enforcing both the SCA and the CWHSSA, compare 29 C.F.R. §§ 4.101-4.191 with 29 C.F.R. §§ 5.1-5.32 and see generally 29 C.F.R. §§ 6.1-6.57, the Court is relatively certain that such analysis would lead to ......
  • Danielsen v. Burnside-Ott Aviation Training Center, Inc., BURNSIDE-OTT
    • United States
    • United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (District of Columbia)
    • August 16, 1991
    ...7.1-7.8 and §§ 7.11-7.18, governs the procedure and methodology for review by the Wage Appeals Board. Also, subpart C of subtitle A of 29 C.F.R. §§ 4.101-4.156 governs the "application of the McNamara-O'Hara Service Contract Act;" subpart D, §§ 4.159-4.186, governs the compensatio......
  • Danielsen v. Dole, Civ. A. No. 89-3143.
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. United States District Court (Columbia)
    • August 28, 1990
    ...... may be instituted" by the Department of Labor, 29 C.F.R. § 6.15(a) (emphasis added), and not the contracting agency, 29 C.F.R. § 4.101(b). Similarly, neither the SCA nor its applicable regulations require the Secretary of Labor or the Secretary of the Navy to withhold contract fund......
  • Bonner v. Metro. Sec. Serv., Civil Action No. SA-10-CV-937-XR
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. 5th Circuit. Western District of Texas
    • March 15, 2011
    ...program.... " 7.Section 207(d) was repealed and it is recognized by all that the reference is now to section 207(e). 8.See 29 C.F.R. §§ 4.101, et seq. 9.See Barnes v. Akal Sec., Inc., 2005 WL 1459112 (D. Kan. 2005). Although Barnes was decided in the context of determining whether amen......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
2 firm's commentaries
  • The Growing Risks of Non-Compliance with Wage Rate Determinations
    • United States
    • LexBlog United States
    • April 13, 2015
    ...the contractor must still ensure that the appropriate wage determination is incorporated within 30 days, pursuant to 29 CFR 4.5(c)(2), 29 CFR 4.101(b), and FAR 22.1015. The SCA wage determination applies to not only the prime contractor but also to subcontractors performing services under t......
  • The Growing Risks of Non-Compliance with Wage Rate Determinations
    • United States
    • LexBlog United States
    • April 13, 2015
    ...the contractor must still ensure that the appropriate wage determination is incorporated within 30 days, pursuant to 29 CFR 4.5(c)(2), 29 CFR 4.101(b), and FAR 22.1015. The SCA wage determination applies to not only the prime contractor but also to subcontractors performing services under t......
1 provisions
  • Increasing the Minimum Wage for Federal Contractors
    • United States
    • The Secretary Of Labor Office
    • Invalid date
    ...stakeholders with questions regarding potential SCA coverage of particular legal instruments to follow the procedures set forth in 29 CFR 4.101(g) to obtain an official ruling or interpretation as to SCA coverage. In the event that the Department is called upon to issue a coverage determina......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT