29 CFR 1910.95 - Occupational noise exposure

Cite as29 CFR 1910.95
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
153 practice notes
  • COVID-19 Vaccination and Testing; Emergency Temporary Standard
    • United States
    • Occupational Safety And Health Administration
    • Invalid date
    ...the hazard of noise is not unique to the workplace, but the Fourth Circuit has upheld OSHA's Occupational Noise Exposure standard (29 CFR 1910.95) (Forging Industry Ass'n v. Sec' of Labor, 773 F.2d 1437, 1444 (4th Cir. 1985)). Diseases caused by bloodborne pathogens, including HIV/AIDS and ......
  • Part II
    • United States
    • Federal Register January 06, 2004
    • January 6, 2004
    ...and hearing protection survey? (a) The deepwater port operator must measure noise and provide hearing protection in accordance with 29 CFR 1910.95. (b) The initial noise survey for a deepwater port must be completed no later than January 1, 2005, or within one year of beginning operations, ......
  • Part III
    • United States
    • Federal Register November 15, 2007
    • November 15, 2007
    ...that the employer must bear the cost of replacing worn out hearing protectors required under the occupational noise exposure standard, 29 CFR 1910.95, but stated its belief that employers should not have to pay for an unlimited supply of protectors or bear the expense in cases where an empl......
  • Deepwater ports: Regulations; revision,
    • United States
    • Federal Register September 29, 2006
    • September 29, 2006
    ...and hearing protection survey? (a) The deepwater port operator must measure noise and provide hearing protection in accordance with 29 CFR 1910.95. (b) The initial noise survey for a deepwater port must be completed within one year of beginning Sec. 150.614 When is protective clothing requi......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
97 cases
  • Natural Resources Defense Council V. Winter, No. 8:07-ev-00335-FMC-FMOX.
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. 9th Circuit. United States District Courts. 9th Circuit. Central District of California
    • February 4, 2008
    ...protection to be used where workers are exposed to a sound level of 90 dB for eight hours or 110 dB for as little as thirty minutes. 29 C.F.R. § 1910.95(a). 7. Defendants have repeatedly described the NDE as laying out "29 mitigation measures." In actual effect, the NDE consists of four bas......
  • Anderson v. Perdue Farms, Inc., Case No. 1:06-cv-01000-MEF-WC.
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. 11th Circuit. Middle District of Alabama
    • March 10, 2009
    ...§ 416.5(b), 29 C.F.R. § 1910.136 & 21 C.F.R. § 110.10(b)(1) (boots); 21 C.F.R. § 110.10(b)(6) & 29 C.F.R. § 1910.134 (bump caps); 29 C.F.R. § 1910.95 (earplugs); 29 C.F.R. § 1910.133 (safety glasses).14 One meaning of "necessary" is "[r]equired by obligation, compulsion, or convention." The......
  • Faultless Div., Bliss & Laughlin Industries, Inc. v. Secretary of Labor, No. 81-1740
    • United States
    • United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (7th Circuit)
    • March 30, 1982
    ...or regulatory Page 1187 command. See, e.g., Kropp Forge Co. v. Secretary of Labor, 657 F.2d 119 (7th Cir. 1981) (noise regulation-29 C.F.R. § 1910.95(b) (1980)); S & H Riggers & Erectors, Inc. v. OSHRC, 659 F.2d 1273 (5th Cir. 1981) (personal protective equipment for construction industry-2......
  • Jones v. Huntington Ingalls, Inc., BRB 16-0690
    • United States
    • Court of Appeals of Longshore Complaints
    • July 29, 2021
    ...audiologist, physician, or a qualified technician under their supervision. DLHWC Proc. Manual 3-0401, para. 3(7)(1);[11] see 29 C.F.R. §1910.95(g)(3); Dir. Letter Br. at 2. As a result, the Director concludes, "[a]lthough 20 C.F.R. §702.404 was never formally amended to include audiologists......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
8 firm's commentaries
  • FAA and OSHA MOU Effective August 26, 2014
    • United States
    • LexBlog United States
    • September 15, 2014
    ...therefore, are not covered by the new regulations. The three standards which OSHA began enforcing are: hearing conservation standard (29 C.F.R. § 1910.95), bloodborne pathogen standard (29 C.F.R. § 1910.30), and hazard communication standard (29 C.F.R. § 1910.1200). Although the policy took......
  • Federal OSHA Assumes Jurisdiction Over Cabin Crews Onboard Aircrafts
    • United States
    • JD Supra United States
    • December 17, 2019
    ...on aircraft in operation. 78 Fed. Reg. 52848. This policy statement allows OSHA to apply its hearing conservation standard (29 C.F.R. § 1910.95), bloodborne pathogen standard (29 C.F.R. § 1910.1030), and hazard communication standard (29 C.F.R. § 1910.1200) to cabin crewmembers. However, th......
  • Federal OSHA Assumes Jurisdiction Over Cabin Crews Onboard Aircrafts
    • United States
    • LexBlog United States
    • December 17, 2019
    ...on aircraft in operation. 78 Fed. Reg. 52848. This policy statement allows OSHA to apply its hearing conservation standard (29 C.F.R. § 1910.95), bloodborne pathogen standard (29 C.F.R. § 1910.1030), and hazard communication standard (29 C.F.R. § 1910.1200) to cabin crewmembers. However, th......
  • OSHA in the Sky – FAA Policy on Application of OSHA Standards for Aircabin Crewmembers
    • United States
    • LexBlog United States
    • August 29, 2013
    ...crewmembers on aircraft in operation. 78 FR 52848. This policy statement will allow OSHA to apply its hearing conservation standard (29 C.F.R. § 1910.95), bloodborne pathogen standard (29 C.F.R. § 1910.1030), and hazard communication standard (29 C.F.R. § 1910.1200) to cabin crewmembers. Ho......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT