29 CFR 1910.95 - Occupational noise exposure

Cite as29 CFR 1910.95
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
152 practice notes
  • COVID-19 Vaccination and Testing; Emergency Temporary Standard
    • United States
    • Occupational Safety And Health Administration
    • Invalid date
    ...the hazard of noise is not unique to the workplace, but the Fourth Circuit has upheld OSHA's Occupational Noise Exposure standard (29 CFR 1910.95) (Forging Industry Ass'n v. Sec' of Labor, 773 F.2d 1437, 1444 (4th Cir. 1985)). Diseases caused by bloodborne pathogens, including HIV/AIDS and ......
  • Deepwater ports: Regulations; revision,
    • United States
    • Federal Register September 29, 2006
    • September 29, 2006
    ...and hearing protection survey? (a) The deepwater port operator must measure noise and provide hearing protection in accordance with 29 CFR 1910.95. (b) The initial noise survey for a deepwater port must be completed within one year of beginning Sec. 150.614 When is protective clothing requi......
  • Part II
    • United States
    • Federal Register January 06, 2004
    • January 6, 2004
    ...and hearing protection survey? (a) The deepwater port operator must measure noise and provide hearing protection in accordance with 29 CFR 1910.95. (b) The initial noise survey for a deepwater port must be completed no later than January 1, 2005, or within one year of beginning operations, ......
  • Part III
    • United States
    • Federal Register November 15, 2007
    • November 15, 2007
    ...that the employer must bear the cost of replacing worn out hearing protectors required under the occupational noise exposure standard, 29 CFR 1910.95, but stated its belief that employers should not have to pay for an unlimited supply of protectors or bear the expense in cases where an empl......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
85 cases
  • Faultless Div., Bliss & Laughlin Industries, Inc. v. Secretary of Labor, No. 81-1740
    • United States
    • United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (7th Circuit)
    • March 30, 1982
    ...or regulatory Page 1187 command. See, e.g., Kropp Forge Co. v. Secretary of Labor, 657 F.2d 119 (7th Cir. 1981) (noise regulation-29 C.F.R. § 1910.95(b) (1980)); S & H Riggers & Erectors, Inc. v. OSHRC, 659 F.2d 1273 (5th Cir. 1981) (personal protective equipment for construction in......
  • Jones v. Huntington Ingalls, Inc., BRB 16-0690
    • United States
    • Court of Appeals of Longshore Complaints
    • July 29, 2021
    ...audiologist, physician, or a qualified technician under their supervision. DLHWC Proc. Manual 3-0401, para. 3(7)(1);[11] see 29 C.F.R. §1910.95(g)(3); Dir. Letter Br. at 2. As a result, the Director concludes, "[a]lthough 20 C.F.R. §702.404 was never formally amended to include audiolo......
  • Modern Drop Forge Co. v. Secretary of Labor, No. 81-1579
    • United States
    • United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (7th Circuit)
    • July 26, 1982
    ...the regulation in question specifically required "feasibility" in the language of the regulation. 29 U.S.C. § 655(b)(5); 29 C.F.R. § 1910.95(b). The same may be said for both Texas Independent Ginners and Turner Co. Secondly, the Company's previous use or contemplated use of a pro......
  • Tufariello v. Long Island R.R. Co., No. 03 CV 3520(CLP).
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. 2nd Circuit. United States District Court (Eastern District of New York)
    • March 18, 2005
    ...Safety and Health Administration ("OSHA"), which concern permissible levels of noise exposure. (Pl's. Mem. at 6 (citing 29 C.F.R. § 1910.95)). Plaintiff argues that 29 C.F.R. § 1910.95 does not contain a preemption clause, nor does it preclude employees from seeking relief from an......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
8 firm's commentaries
  • FAA and OSHA MOU Effective August 26, 2014
    • United States
    • LexBlog United States
    • September 15, 2014
    ...therefore, are not covered by the new regulations. The three standards which OSHA began enforcing are: hearing conservation standard (29 C.F.R. § 1910.95), bloodborne pathogen standard (29 C.F.R. § 1910.30), and hazard communication standard (29 C.F.R. § 1910.1200). Although the policy took......
  • Federal OSHA Assumes Jurisdiction Over Cabin Crews Onboard Aircrafts
    • United States
    • LexBlog United States
    • December 17, 2019
    ...on aircraft in operation. 78 Fed. Reg. 52848. This policy statement allows OSHA to apply its hearing conservation standard (29 C.F.R. § 1910.95), bloodborne pathogen standard (29 C.F.R. § 1910.1030), and hazard communication standard (29 C.F.R. § 1910.1200) to cabin crewmembers. However, th......
  • Federal OSHA Assumes Jurisdiction Over Cabin Crews Onboard Aircrafts
    • United States
    • JD Supra United States
    • December 17, 2019
    ...on aircraft in operation. 78 Fed. Reg. 52848. This policy statement allows OSHA to apply its hearing conservation standard (29 C.F.R. § 1910.95), bloodborne pathogen standard (29 C.F.R. § 1910.1030), and hazard communication standard (29 C.F.R. § 1910.1200) to cabin crewmembers. However, th......
  • OSHA in the Sky – FAA Policy on Application of OSHA Standards for Aircabin Crewmembers
    • United States
    • LexBlog United States
    • August 29, 2013
    ...crewmembers on aircraft in operation. 78 FR 52848. This policy statement will allow OSHA to apply its hearing conservation standard (29 C.F.R. § 1910.95), bloodborne pathogen standard (29 C.F.R. § 1910.1030), and hazard communication standard (29 C.F.R. § 1910.1200) to cabin crewmembers. Ho......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
47 provisions
  • Improve Tracking of Workplace Injuries and Illnesses
    • United States
    • Federal Register May 12, 2016
    • May 12, 2016
    ...including the collection and dissemination of records of occupational injuries and illnesses. For example, the OSHA requirements at 29 CFR 1910.95 are a ``standard'' because they include remedial measures to address the specific and already identified hazard of employee exposure to occupati......
  • Safety and health standards, etc.: Employer payment for personal protective equipment,
    • United States
    • Federal Register March 31, 1999
    • March 31, 1999
    ...standards explicitly requiring employers to furnish personal protective equipment ``at no cost to employees.'' ‹SUP›1‹/SUP› \1\ See 29 CFR 1910.95(i)(1), (i)(3) (hearing conservation); 29 CFR 1910.1001(g)(1), (g)(2)(i), (h)(1) (asbestos); 29 CFR 1910.1018(h)(1), (h)(2)(i), (j)(1) (inorganic......
  • Part II
    • United States
    • Federal Register January 06, 2004
    • January 6, 2004
    ...and hearing protection survey? (a) The deepwater port operator must measure noise and provide hearing protection in accordance with 29 CFR 1910.95. (b) The initial noise survey for a deepwater port must be completed no later than January 1, 2005, or within one year of beginning operations, ......
  • Part III
    • United States
    • Federal Register November 15, 2007
    • November 15, 2007
    ...that the employer must bear the cost of replacing worn out hearing protectors required under the occupational noise exposure standard, 29 CFR 1910.95, but stated its belief that employers should not have to pay for an unlimited supply of protectors or bear the expense in cases where an empl......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT