29 CFR 1903.4 - Objection to inspection

Cite as29 CFR 1903.4
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
50 practice notes
  • United States v. New Orleans Public Serv., Inc., Civ. A. No. 73-1297.
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. 5th Circuit. United States District Court (Eastern District of Louisiana)
    • November 16, 1979
    ...in the instant case, authorize the appropriate officials to obtain compulsory judicial process to enforce the provisions of the act. 29 C.F.R. § 1903.4 (1978).8 Moreover, the Secretary expressly did not rely on the district court order to admit the inspector that was actually issued in the ......
  • Donovan v. A.A. Beiro Const. Co., Inc., Nos. 83-2008
    • United States
    • United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (District of Columbia)
    • October 26, 1984
    ...Sec. 666(j). Violations not posing such a risk are defined as nonserious. 29 U.S.C. Sec. 666(c). 2 Beiro argues that OSHA regulation 29 C.F.R. Sec. 1903.4 requires compulsory process if entry is denied. See Reply Brief for Beiro at 5. Section 1903.4 states, in pertinent (a) Upon a refusal t......
  • Marshall v. Gibson's Products, Inc. of Plano, No. 76-1526
    • United States
    • United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (5th Circuit)
    • November 20, 1978
    ...Director, and the Regional Solicitor, "who shall promptly take appropriate action, including compulsory process, if necessary." 29 C.F.R. § 1903.4 (1977). It is therefore claimed that jurisdiction exists in the district court to issue such process. We think this argument patently paralogist......
  • Cerro Metal Products v. Marshall, Nos. 79-1760
    • United States
    • United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (3rd Circuit)
    • April 24, 1980
    ...it harms the public by jeopardizing OSHA enforcement; whether an unauthorized inspection constitutes irreparable harm; and whether 29 C.F.R. § 1903.4, either as originally promulgated or as amended, empowers OSHA's compliance officers to apply for ex parte inspection A. Harm to the Public W......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
51 cases
  • United States v. New Orleans Public Serv., Inc., Civ. A. No. 73-1297.
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. 5th Circuit. United States District Court (Eastern District of Louisiana)
    • November 16, 1979
    ...in the instant case, authorize the appropriate officials to obtain compulsory judicial process to enforce the provisions of the act. 29 C.F.R. § 1903.4 (1978).8 Moreover, the Secretary expressly did not rely on the district court order to admit the inspector that was actually issued in the ......
  • Donovan v. A.A. Beiro Const. Co., Inc., Nos. 83-2008
    • United States
    • United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (District of Columbia)
    • October 26, 1984
    ...Sec. 666(j). Violations not posing such a risk are defined as nonserious. 29 U.S.C. Sec. 666(c). 2 Beiro argues that OSHA regulation 29 C.F.R. Sec. 1903.4 requires compulsory process if entry is denied. See Reply Brief for Beiro at 5. Section 1903.4 states, in pertinent (a) Upon a refusal t......
  • Marshall v. Gibson's Products, Inc. of Plano, No. 76-1526
    • United States
    • United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (5th Circuit)
    • November 20, 1978
    ...Director, and the Regional Solicitor, "who shall promptly take appropriate action, including compulsory process, if necessary." 29 C.F.R. § 1903.4 (1977). It is therefore claimed that jurisdiction exists in the district court to issue such process. We think this argument patently paralogist......
  • Cerro Metal Products v. Marshall, Nos. 79-1760
    • United States
    • United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (3rd Circuit)
    • April 24, 1980
    ...it harms the public by jeopardizing OSHA enforcement; whether an unauthorized inspection constitutes irreparable harm; and whether 29 C.F.R. § 1903.4, either as originally promulgated or as amended, empowers OSHA's compliance officers to apply for ex parte inspection A. Harm to the Public W......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT