29 C.F.R. 1601.30 - Notices to be posted
| Cite as | 29 C.F.R. 1601.30 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
31 practice notes
-
Equal Participation of Faith-Based Organizations in the Federal Agencies' Programs and Activities
...and that similar notices were required by the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA), 29 CFR 516.4; the Equal Employment Opportunity Act (EEOA), 29 CFR 1601.30; and the Family Medical Leave Act (FMLA), 29 CFR 825.300(a). Another commenter made the same point based on a poster requirement that appl......
-
General Electric Company v. Gilbert Gilbert v. General Electric Company 19 20, 1976, Nos. 74-1589 and 74-1590
...would not be in violation of Title VII." App. 721-722. Page 143 A few weeks later, in an opinion letter expressly issued pursuant to 29 CFR § 1601.30 (1975), the EEOC's position was that "an insurance or other benefit plan may simply exclude maternity as a covered risk, and such an exclusio......
-
Schele v. Porter Memorial Hosp., No. 2:00-CV-153.
...of the deadline for filing a charge of discrimination because my employer did not post a notice in the workplace, as required by 29 C.F.R. § 1601.30(a). In spite of this explanation, the EEOC dismissed the Plaintiff's Charge as untimely Pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-5(e), claimants have 300......
-
Weisbord v. Michigan State University, No. G76-475 CA5.
...not consider the absence of a "reasonable cause" determination as providing employer immunity from similar charges in a federal court, 29 CFR § 1601.30, and the courts of appeal have held that, in view of the large volume of complaints before the Commission and the nonadversary character of......
Request a trial to view additional results
22 cases
-
Schele v. Porter Memorial Hosp., No. 2:00-CV-153.
...of the deadline for filing a charge of discrimination because my employer did not post a notice in the workplace, as required by 29 C.F.R. § 1601.30(a). In spite of this explanation, the EEOC dismissed the Plaintiff's Charge as untimely Pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-5(e), claimants have 300......
-
Weisbord v. Michigan State University, No. G76-475 CA5.
...not consider the absence of a "reasonable cause" determination as providing employer immunity from similar charges in a federal court, 29 CFR § 1601.30, and the courts of appeal have held that, in view of the large volume of complaints before the Commission and the nonadversary character of......
-
General Electric Company v. Gilbert Gilbert v. General Electric Company 19 20, 1976, Nos. 74-1589 and 74-1590
...would not be in violation of Title VII." App. 721-722. Page 143 A few weeks later, in an opinion letter expressly issued pursuant to 29 CFR § 1601.30 (1975), the EEOC's position was that "an insurance or other benefit plan may simply exclude maternity as a covered risk, and such an exclusio......
-
EEOC v. ANDERSON'S RESTAURANT OF CHARLOTTE, No. C-C-86-002-P.
...On the whole, evidence with respect to Linsay's claim was severely scanty, unreliable and insufficient. EEOC POSTER REQUIREMENTS (29) 29 C.F.R. § 1601.30 requires that every employer "shall post and keep posted in conspicuous places upon its premises ..." an equal employment opportunity pos......
Request a trial to view additional results
1 firm's commentaries
-
OFCCP Week In Review: June 2021
...has now adjusted upward the civil monetary penalty for violation of the notice-posting requirements the EEOC has set out in a Rule (29 CFR 1601.30(a)) implementing three statutes the EEOC enforces: Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, the Americans with Disabilities Act, and the Genet......