47 CFR 61.58 - Notice requirements

Cite as47 CFR 61.58
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
13 practice notes
  • Aeronautical Radio, Inc. v. F. C. C., Nos. 77-1333
    • United States
    • United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (District of Columbia)
    • May 4, 1981
    ...31 Section 205(d) of the Federal Power Act, 16 U.S.C § 824d(d) (1976) is comparable to the notice provisions of the Communications Act, 47 C.F.R. § 61.58 32 The court in Papago also observed that "(w)e are not concerned in this case with orders that accept tariff filings and allow them to t......
  • TOTAL TELECOM. v. American Tel. and Tel. Co., Civ. A. No. 95-2273.
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. United States District Court (Columbia)
    • March 5, 1996
    ...so that it may investigate and if necessary suspend or reject those rates if they are unreasonably high or otherwise are not legal. 47 C.F.R. § 61.58(c)(1). Competitive access providers, which lack the market dominance of a dominant carrier, are permitted to file tariffs on one-day's notice......
  • Fax Telecommunicaciones Inc. v. AT & T, Docket No. 97-7374
    • United States
    • United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (2nd Circuit)
    • March 10, 1998
    ...days, the contract tariff is effective, assuming neither the FCC nor any member of the public objects. Id. at pp 91, 121, 122; 47 C.F.R. §§ 61.58(c)(6), 61.42(c)(8). The FCC will presume that rates filed in a contract tariff are reasonable. Matter of Competition p 74. The carrier must make ......
  • Nader v. F. C. C., Nos. 73-1045
    • United States
    • United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (District of Columbia)
    • September 29, 1975
    ...specific proposals. 18 F.C.C.2d at 763. 13 The requirement of notice to the Commission was subsequently expanded by rule to sixty days. 47 C.F.R. § 61.58 (1974). The validity of this modification was upheld in AT&T v. FCC, 503 F.2d 612 (2d Cir. 14 See note 3 supra. 15 See FCC v. Schreiber, ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
12 cases
  • Aeronautical Radio, Inc. v. F. C. C., Nos. 77-1333
    • United States
    • United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (District of Columbia)
    • May 4, 1981
    ...31 Section 205(d) of the Federal Power Act, 16 U.S.C § 824d(d) (1976) is comparable to the notice provisions of the Communications Act, 47 C.F.R. § 61.58 32 The court in Papago also observed that "(w)e are not concerned in this case with orders that accept tariff filings and allow them to t......
  • Fax Telecommunicaciones Inc. v. AT & T, Docket No. 97-7374
    • United States
    • United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (2nd Circuit)
    • March 10, 1998
    ...days, the contract tariff is effective, assuming neither the FCC nor any member of the public objects. Id. at pp 91, 121, 122; 47 C.F.R. §§ 61.58(c)(6), 61.42(c)(8). The FCC will presume that rates filed in a contract tariff are reasonable. Matter of Competition p 74. The carrier must make ......
  • TOTAL TELECOM. v. American Tel. and Tel. Co., Civ. A. No. 95-2273.
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. United States District Court (Columbia)
    • March 5, 1996
    ...so that it may investigate and if necessary suspend or reject those rates if they are unreasonably high or otherwise are not legal. 47 C.F.R. § 61.58(c)(1). Competitive access providers, which lack the market dominance of a dominant carrier, are permitted to file tariffs on one-day's notice......
  • Nader v. F. C. C., Nos. 73-1045
    • United States
    • United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (District of Columbia)
    • September 29, 1975
    ...specific proposals. 18 F.C.C.2d at 763. 13 The requirement of notice to the Commission was subsequently expanded by rule to sixty days. 47 C.F.R. § 61.58 (1974). The validity of this modification was upheld in AT&T v. FCC, 503 F.2d 612 (2d Cir. 14 See note 3 supra. 15 See FCC v. Schreiber, ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
1 firm's commentaries

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT