47 CFR 61.58 - Notice requirements
| Cite as | 47 CFR 61.58 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
13 practice notes
-
Aeronautical Radio, Inc. v. F. C. C., Nos. 77-1333
...31 Section 205(d) of the Federal Power Act, 16 U.S.C § 824d(d) (1976) is comparable to the notice provisions of the Communications Act, 47 C.F.R. § 61.58 32 The court in Papago also observed that "(w)e are not concerned in this case with orders that accept tariff filings and allow them to t......
-
TOTAL TELECOM. v. American Tel. and Tel. Co., Civ. A. No. 95-2273.
...so that it may investigate and if necessary suspend or reject those rates if they are unreasonably high or otherwise are not legal. 47 C.F.R. § 61.58(c)(1). Competitive access providers, which lack the market dominance of a dominant carrier, are permitted to file tariffs on one-day's notice......
-
Fax Telecommunicaciones Inc. v. AT & T, Docket No. 97-7374
...days, the contract tariff is effective, assuming neither the FCC nor any member of the public objects. Id. at pp 91, 121, 122; 47 C.F.R. §§ 61.58(c)(6), 61.42(c)(8). The FCC will presume that rates filed in a contract tariff are reasonable. Matter of Competition p 74. The carrier must make ......
-
Nader v. F. C. C., Nos. 73-1045
...specific proposals. 18 F.C.C.2d at 763. 13 The requirement of notice to the Commission was subsequently expanded by rule to sixty days. 47 C.F.R. § 61.58 (1974). The validity of this modification was upheld in AT&T v. FCC, 503 F.2d 612 (2d Cir. 14 See note 3 supra. 15 See FCC v. Schreiber, ......
Request a trial to view additional results
12 cases
-
Aeronautical Radio, Inc. v. F. C. C., Nos. 77-1333
...31 Section 205(d) of the Federal Power Act, 16 U.S.C § 824d(d) (1976) is comparable to the notice provisions of the Communications Act, 47 C.F.R. § 61.58 32 The court in Papago also observed that "(w)e are not concerned in this case with orders that accept tariff filings and allow them to t......
-
Fax Telecommunicaciones Inc. v. AT & T, Docket No. 97-7374
...days, the contract tariff is effective, assuming neither the FCC nor any member of the public objects. Id. at pp 91, 121, 122; 47 C.F.R. §§ 61.58(c)(6), 61.42(c)(8). The FCC will presume that rates filed in a contract tariff are reasonable. Matter of Competition p 74. The carrier must make ......
-
TOTAL TELECOM. v. American Tel. and Tel. Co., Civ. A. No. 95-2273.
...so that it may investigate and if necessary suspend or reject those rates if they are unreasonably high or otherwise are not legal. 47 C.F.R. § 61.58(c)(1). Competitive access providers, which lack the market dominance of a dominant carrier, are permitted to file tariffs on one-day's notice......
-
Nader v. F. C. C., Nos. 73-1045
...specific proposals. 18 F.C.C.2d at 763. 13 The requirement of notice to the Commission was subsequently expanded by rule to sixty days. 47 C.F.R. § 61.58 (1974). The validity of this modification was upheld in AT&T v. FCC, 503 F.2d 612 (2d Cir. 14 See note 3 supra. 15 See FCC v. Schreiber, ......
Request a trial to view additional results
1 firm's commentaries
-
D.C. Circuit Finds FCC's Elimination of Dominant Carrier Regulation for Certain ILECs' Special Access Broadband Lines Reasonable, but Subject to Review in Current Special Access Docket
...al. v. FCC, Case No. 07-1426 (D.C. Cir. Jul. 17, 2009) (“Ad Hoc Telecom”). 2 See 47 U.S.C. §§ 201(b); 202(a); and 251(a)(1). 3 See id. & 47 C.F.R. 61.58. 4 Ad Hoc Telecom at 11 (citing EarthLink, Inc. v. FCC, 462 F.3d 1, 8 (D.C. Cir. 2006)). 5 Special Access Rates for Price Cap Local Exchan......