20 CFR 416.930 - Need to follow prescribed treatment

Cite as20 CFR 416.930
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
681 practice notes
  • Introduction to the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory Actions
    • United States
    • Federal Register December 15, 2015
    • December 15, 2015
    ...20 CFR 404.1530; 20 CFR 404.1546; 20 CFR 416.902; 20 CFR 416.912; 20 CFR 416.920b; 20 CFR 416.921 to 416.923; 20 CFR 416.926 and 416.927; 20 CFR 416.930; 20 CFR Legal Deadline: None. Abstract: We are proposing several revisions to our evidence rules. The proposals include: Redefining severa......
  • Introduction to the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory Actions-Fall 2016
    • United States
    • Federal Register December 23, 2016
    • December 23, 2016
    ...20 CFR 404.1530; 20 CFR 404.1546; 20 CFR 416.902; 20 CFR 416.912; 20 CFR 416.920b; 20 CFR 416.921 to 416.923; 20 CFR 416.926 and 416.927; 20 CFR 416.930; 20 CFR Legal Deadline: None. Abstract: We are proposing several revisions to our medical evidence rules. The proposals include redefining......
  • Phelps v. Colvin, No. 4:13CV684 TIA
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. 8th Circuit. United States District Court (Eastern District of Missouri)
    • September 30, 2014
    ...2010) ("noncompliance can constitute evidence that is inconsistent with a treating physician's medical opinion"); 20 C.F.R. §§ 404.1530, 416.930 (unjustified failure to follow prescribed treatment is grounds for denying disability).Page 34 As demonstrated above, a review of the ALJ's decisi......
  • Garrett v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec., CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:16-cv-1139
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. 3th Circuit. United States District Court of Middle District of Pennsylvania
    • February 11, 2019
    ...The four-factor test and caselaw cited above addresses scenarios where an ALJ denied benefits pursuant to 20 C.F.R. § 404.1530, 20 C.F.R. § 416.930, and SSR 82-59, 1982 WL 31384.4 These regulations are inapplicable to this case. My review of ALJ Brady's analysis reflects that the ALJ did no......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
676 cases
  • Phelps v. Colvin, No. 4:13CV684 TIA
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. 8th Circuit. United States District Court (Eastern District of Missouri)
    • September 30, 2014
    ...2010) ("noncompliance can constitute evidence that is inconsistent with a treating physician's medical opinion"); 20 C.F.R. §§ 404.1530, 416.930 (unjustified failure to follow prescribed treatment is grounds for denying disability).Page 34 As demonstrated above, a review of the ALJ's decisi......
  • Garrett v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec., CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:16-cv-1139
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. 3th Circuit. United States District Court of Middle District of Pennsylvania
    • February 11, 2019
    ...The four-factor test and caselaw cited above addresses scenarios where an ALJ denied benefits pursuant to 20 C.F.R. § 404.1530, 20 C.F.R. § 416.930, and SSR 82-59, 1982 WL 31384.4 These regulations are inapplicable to this case. My review of ALJ Brady's analysis reflects that the ALJ did no......
  • Eiker v. Astrue, Civil Action No. CBD-11-3584
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. 4th Circuit. United States District Court (Maryland)
    • May 15, 2013
    ...require claimants to follow treatment prescribed by their physicians that might restore their ability to work. 20 C.F.R. §§ 404.1530(a), 416.930(a) (2011). However, they also provide acceptable reasons for failure to follow prescribed treatment and require that a claimant's physical, mental......
  • Sangel v. Astrue, No. C10–4070–PAZ.
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. 8th Circuit. Northern District of Iowa
    • May 23, 2011
    ...reason is grounds for denying an application for benefits.” Roth v. Shalala, 45 F.3d 279, 282 (8th Cir.1995); see 20 C.F.R. §§ 404.1530(b), 416.930(b). Good reasons justifying medical noncompliance may include a claimant's mental disorder, Pate–Fires v. Astrue, 564 F.3d 935, 945–47 (8th Cir......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
1 firm's commentaries

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT