50 CFR 600.350 - National Standard 9-Bycatch
| Cite as | 50 CFR 600.350 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
29 practice notes
-
Oceana Inc. v. Locke ., Civil Action No. 08-318(ESH).
...a final rule, to assist Regional Councils in the development of FMPs. 63 Fed.Reg. 24,212 (May 1, 1998), codified in relevant part at 50 C.F.R. § 600.350. The guidelines state that “[a] review and, where necessary, improvement of data collection methods, data sources, and applications of dat......
-
Blue Water Fisherman's Ass'n v. Mineta, No. Civ.A. 99-2846 RWR.
...will buy (being too small, of the wrong gender or of bad quality), or because a regulation dictates that the fish cannot be kept. See 50 C.F.R. § 600.350(c). This second kind of bycatch is referred to as a regulatory discard. Regulatory discards may occur where certain fish species are so o......
-
Natural Res. Def. Council v. Nat'l Marine Fisheries Serv., Civil Action No. 12–cv–0938 KBJ
...standard, precisely because “[t]he priority under this standard is first to avoid catching bycatch species where practicable.” 50 C.F.R. § 600.350(d). “Inconvenience is not an excuse; bycatch must be avoided as much as practicable, and bycatch mortality must be reduced until further reducti......
-
A.M.L. Intern., Inc. v. Daley, No. Civ.A. 00-10241-EFH.
...Two, Five, Eight and Nine. See 16 U.S.C. §§ 1851(a)(1), (2), (5), (8), (9); see also 50 C.F.R. §§ 600.310(a), 600.315, 600.330, 600.345, 600.350. Finally, the plaintiffs argue that the implementation of the interim final rule violates public notice and comment requirements, as well the Regu......
Request a trial to view additional results
19 cases
-
Oceana Inc. v. Locke ., Civil Action No. 08-318(ESH).
...a final rule, to assist Regional Councils in the development of FMPs. 63 Fed.Reg. 24,212 (May 1, 1998), codified in relevant part at 50 C.F.R. § 600.350. The guidelines state that “[a] review and, where necessary, improvement of data collection methods, data sources, and applications of dat......
-
Blue Water Fisherman's Ass'n v. Mineta, No. Civ.A. 99-2846 RWR.
...will buy (being too small, of the wrong gender or of bad quality), or because a regulation dictates that the fish cannot be kept. See 50 C.F.R. § 600.350(c). This second kind of bycatch is referred to as a regulatory discard. Regulatory discards may occur where certain fish species are so o......
-
Natural Res. Def. Council v. Nat'l Marine Fisheries Serv., Civil Action No. 12–cv–0938 KBJ
...standard, precisely because “[t]he priority under this standard is first to avoid catching bycatch species where practicable.” 50 C.F.R. § 600.350(d). “Inconvenience is not an excuse; bycatch must be avoided as much as practicable, and bycatch mortality must be reduced until further reducti......
-
A.M.L. Intern., Inc. v. Daley, No. Civ.A. 00-10241-EFH.
...Two, Five, Eight and Nine. See 16 U.S.C. §§ 1851(a)(1), (2), (5), (8), (9); see also 50 C.F.R. §§ 600.310(a), 600.315, 600.330, 600.345, 600.350. Finally, the plaintiffs argue that the implementation of the interim final rule violates public notice and comment requirements, as well the Regu......
Request a trial to view additional results
1 books & journal articles
-
Minimum Size Restrictions Are a Problem for Fisheries, Is Litigation the Solution?
...(D.D.C. 2012). 109. Id . at 45-46. 110. Id . at 42. 111. Conservation Law Found. v. Evans, 209 F. Supp. 2d 1, 11 n.28 (D.D.C. 2001); 50 C.F.R. §600.350(d) (2017). 112. 50 C.F.R. §600.350(d)(2), (4) (2017). 113. Paciic Marine Conservation Council v. Evans, 200 F. Supp. 2d 1194 (N.D. Cal. 200......