36 C.F.R. §219.10 - Multiple use

Cite as36 C.F.R. §219.10
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
129 cases
  • Cent. Sierra Envtl. Res. Ctr. v. Stanislaus Nat'l Forest, 1:17-cv-00441-LJO-SAB
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. 9th Circuit. United States District Courts. 9th Circuit. Eastern District of California
    • August 6, 2019
    ...contracts, cooperative agreements, and other instruments for occupancy and use of affected lands are consistent with the plan." 36 C.F.R. § 219.10(e) (1998); Friends of Southeast's Future v. Morrison, 153 F.3d 1059, 1067 (9th Cir. 1998) (quoting 36 C.F.R. § 219.10(e)). The Forest Service's ......
  • Hammond v. Norton, No. CIV.A.01-2345(PLF).
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. United States District Court (Columbia)
    • May 13, 2005
    ...ROD"), A.R. vol. 5 at 407. As part of this ROD, USFS made a "Finding of Non-Significant Amendment" ("FONSA") pursuant to former 36 C.F.R. § 219.10(f) (1997) (amended Jan. 5, 2005), allowing amendment of the Forest Plan by means of an expedited administrative process, rather than the extende......
  • Citizens for Environmental Quality v. US, Civ. A. No. 87-F-1714.
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. 10th Circuit. United States District Court of Colorado
    • August 24, 1989
    ...LRMP is achieved through individual site-specific projects, and all projects must be consistent with the LRMP. 16 U.S.C. § 1604(i); 36 C.F.R. § 219.10(e). LRMPs must be prepared in compliance with NEPA, (16 U.S.C. § 1604(g)(1)), and the regulations contemplate the preparation of an appropri......
  • Sierra Club v. US Forest Service, Civ. A. No. 92-5101.
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. 8th Circuit. United States District Courts. 8th Circuit. District of South Dakota
    • October 28, 1993
    ...§ 1604(g)(1). Projects undertaken within a national forest must comply with the Forest Plan for that forest. See 16 U.S.C. § 1604(i); 36 C.F.R. § 219.10(e). A Forest Plan for the Black Hills National Forest, of which the Victoria Planning Area is a subdivision, was adopted in 1983. See Tr. ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
2 books & journal articles
  • Advising Noah: A Legal Analysis of Assisted Migration
    • United States
    • Environmental Law Reporter No. 39-5, May 2009
    • May 1, 2009
    ...however, the Agency has amended its regulations and the diversity clause is now implemented by the sustainability criteria laid out in 36 C.F.R. 219.10(b), which states: he overall goal of the ecological element of sustainability is to provide a framework to contribute to sustaining native ......
  • Federal Grazing Lands as 'Conservation Lands' in the 30 by 30 Program
    • United States
    • Environmental Law Reporter No. 52-4, April 2022
    • April 1, 2022
    ...case was dismissed on other grounds). 34. 36 C.F.R. §219.12 (2021) (emphasis added). 35. Id . §219.19; see also 16 U.S.C. §531(a). 36. 36 C.F.R. §219.10 (2021). 37. FLPMA, 43 U.S.C. §1732(a) (“[t]he Secretary shall manage the public lands under principles of multiple use and sustained yield......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT