7 CFR 273.21 - Monthly Reporting and Retrospective Budgeting (MRRB)
| Cite as | 7 CFR 273.21 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
12 practice notes
-
Department of Agriculture, Food and Nutrition Service,
...mandated to use TANF budgeting procedures when determining eligibility for food stamp households/TANF households. Current regulations at 7 CFR 273.21(a)(2) provide that State agencies must ``determine eligibility, either prospectively or retrospectively, on the same basis that it uses for i......
-
Part II
...CFR 273.12(a)(1)(vi) and (a)(4). The Department did not propose any changes to the monthly reporting and retrospective budgeting rules at 7 CFR 273.21 because under 7 CFR 273.21(h) and (i) the State agency may determine what information must be reported on the monthly report and what inform......
-
Department of Agriculture, Food and Nutrition Service,
...monthly reporting households for 6 or 12 months, unless FNS granted a waiver. We proposed to revise 7 CFR 273.10(f) and to remove 7 CFR 273.21(a)(3) to reflect these changes. We also proposed to include in the new 7 CFR 273.10(f)(2), the provision at 7 CFR 273.21(t) that State agencies must......
-
Food Stamp Program:
Certification of eligible households,
...CFR 273.12(a)(1)(vi) and (a)(4). The Department is not proposing any changes to the monthly reporting and retrospective budgeting rules at 7 CFR 273.21 because under 7 CFR 273.21(h) and (i) the State agency may determine what information must be reported on the monthly report and what infor......
Request a trial to view additional results
3 cases
-
Gilman v. Helms, Civ. No. 83-535-D.
...2015(c)(4), but simply contests the proposed termination solely on the basis of questions of law or policy. See 7 U.S.C. § 2015(c)(4); 7 C.F.R. § 273.21(p)(2)(i); Ohio State Consumer Education Association v. Schweiker, 541 F.Supp. 915, 920-21 (S.D.Ohio 1982). Cf. Goldberg v. Kelly, 397 U.S.......
-
Cotton v. Mansour, 86-1644
...to this suit. The program itself is administered by the state. In May 1984, in response to a Department of Agriculture regulation, 7 C.F.R. Sec. 273.21(j)(1)(vii)(B), MDSS changed its method of counting supplemental Aid to Families with Dependent Children (AFDC) payments in calculating elig......
-
Cotton v. Mansour, 85-CV-40068-FL.
...food. MDSS claimed its method of calculation was correct because it considered the shelter allowance to be a corrective payment under 7 C.F.R. § 273.21(j)(1)(vii)(B). The Food Stamp Act, 7 U.S.C. § 2011 et seq. was enacted by Congress to provide federal funds to "permit low-income household......