40 C.F.R. §122.62 - [Effective 11/27/2023] Modification or revocation and reissuance of permits (applicable to State programs, see Section 123.25)

Cite as40 C.F.R. §122.62
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
27 cases
  • U.S. v. Smithfield Foods, Inc., Action No. 2:96cv1204.
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. 4th Circuit. United States District Court (Eastern District of Virginia)
    • May 30, 1997
    ...Permit. First, there is no evidence that defendants ever followed the specific, mandatory procedures for modification of a Permit. See 40 C.F.R. § 122.62; see also Citizens for a Better Environment-California v. Union Oil Co. of California, 83 F.3d 1111, 1119 n. 7 (9th Cir.1996) (finding th......
  • Chevron U.S.A., Inc. v. Hammond, 81-3700
    • United States
    • United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (9th Circuit)
    • February 3, 1984
    ...state water quality standards shall be incorporated into the permit conditions along with other relevant effluent limitations. 40 C.F.R. Sec. 122.62; see also 33 U.S.C. Sec. 1341(a)(1); 40 C.F.R. Sec. 124.53(a), (e). Thus, absent preemption by another federal statute, such as the PWSA/PTSA,......
  • Citizens for a Better Environ. v. Union Oil Co., C 94-0712 TEH
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. 9th Circuit. United States District Courts. 9th Circuit. Northern District of California
    • July 8, 1994
    ...First, the enforcement agency modifying the permit must make a finding of cause appropriate for modifying the permit. 40 C.F.R. §§ 122.41(f), 122.62, 122.63. The Regional Board made no such finding in this case. Second, the enforcement agency must prepare a draft permit and issue a fact she......
  • Connecticut Fund for Environment, Inc. v. Upjohn Co., Civ. No. N-85-349 (PCD).
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. 2nd Circuit. United States District Court (Connecticut)
    • May 18, 1987
    ...21 Furthermore, even if defendant was entitled to a modification of its effluent limitation to reflect its BAT system results, 40 C.F.R. § 122.62(a)(17), it remained liable during the pendency of any such request to comply with the Permit conditions until modified. 40 C.F.R. § 122.41(f); 40......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
2 books & journal articles
  • A New Framework
    • United States
    • The Clean Water Act TMDL Program: Law, Policy, and Implementation
    • August 23, 2002
    ...abating, or buying out pollution from existing sources. See Guidance for Water Quality-Based Decisions , supra note 30, at 51. 69. 40 C.F.R. §122.62(a)(2) (1997): The Director has received new information. Permits may be modified during their terms for this cause only if the information was......
  • Permits and state permit programs
    • United States
    • Introduction to environmental law: cases and materials on water pollution control - 2d Edition
    • July 23, 2017
    ...as for the initial issuance. Some very minor modiications (e.g., typographical errors), may be accomplished without public notice. See 40 C.F.R. §§ 122.62, 122.63. Applications for modiications of permits do not stay the efectiveness or enforceability of the permit provisions at issue while......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT