37 CFR 1.21 - Miscellaneous fees and charges

Cite as37 CFR 1.21
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
37 practice notes
  • Patent cases: Patent business goals; implementation,
    • United States
    • Federal Register October 05, 1998
    • October 5, 1998
    ...in a related provisional or nonprovisional application filedwithin those two years. The filing fee for a Disclosure Document set forth in 37 CFR 1.21(c) is $10. See MPEP The PTO currently processes Disclosure Documents as follows: Each Disclosure Document is assigned an identifying number, ......
  • Practice and procedure: Patent and trademark cases rules of practice; representation of others before Patent and Trademark Office,
    • United States
    • Federal Register December 12, 2003
    • December 12, 2003
    ...recognize an individual, or reinstate a suspended or excluded practitioner would be reviewable by the USPTO Director. A fee, set forth in 37 CFR 1.21(a)(5), would be Section 11.3 would provide for waiver of the rules and qualified immunity. Paragraph (a) of Sec. 11.3, like current Sec. 10.1......
  • Part II
    • United States
    • Federal Register December 12, 2003
    • December 12, 2003
    ...recognize an individual, or reinstate a suspended or excluded practitioner would be reviewable by the USPTO Director. A fee, set forth in 37 CFR 1.21(a)(5), would be Section 11.3 would provide for waiver of the rules and qualified immunity. Paragraph (a) of Sec. 11.3, like current Sec. 10.1......
  • Changes To Require Identification of Attributable Owner
    • United States
    • Federal Register January 24, 2014
    • January 24, 2014
    ...----------------------------------------------------------------------- DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE United States Patent and Trademark Office 37 CFR Part 1 Docket No.: PTO-P-2013-0040 RIN 0651-AC90 Changes To Require Identification of Attributable Owner AGENCY: United States Patent and Trademark......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
3 cases
  • Ex parte Moriwaki, Appeal 2010-008006[1]
    • United States
    • United States Patent and Trademark Office. United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board
    • February 13, 2012
    ...scheduled to be held in this appeal on February 09, 2012 has been waived. [2] We note that "circuit" was not properly entered as per rule 37 CFR 1.21(b) (ii) in the amendments filed October 18, 2007 and amended April 16, 2008. --------- ...
  • Hyman A. Michlin, B-148379
    • United States
    • Comptroller General of the United States
    • April 16, 1962
    ...with knowledge of that office's published rules regarding service fees, for the payment of which you maintained a deposit account. 37 C.F.R. 1.21. Consequently, there appears no basis, taking into consideration the various matters you have presented, for relieving you of the special service......
  • Hyman A. Michlin, B-148379
    • United States
    • Comptroller General of the United States
    • June 29, 1962
    ...with knowledge of that officer's published rules regarding service fees, for the payment of which you maintained a deposit account. 37 C.F.R. 1.21. there appears no basis, taking into consideration the various matters you have presented, for relieving you of the special service charge.' you......
1 firm's commentaries
  • Fees for Recording IP Security Agreements with the USPTO and USCO
    • United States
    • JD Supra United States
    • July 1, 2014
    ...is accessible by clicking "current fees" on the home page of the USCO website (http://www.copyright.gov/docs/fees.html). 1 - 37 C.F.R. § 1.21(h)(1). 2 - 37 C.F.R. § 1.21(h)(2). 3 - 37 C.F.R. § 2.6(b)(6)(i)-(ii). 4 - U.S. Copyright Office, Calculating Fees for Recording Documents and Notices......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT