30 C.F.R. §75.1722 - Mechanical equipment guards

Cite as30 C.F.R. §75.1722
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
2 cases
  • Holland v. United States, Civ. A. No. 75-0158-0(G).
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. 6th Circuit. United States District Court of Western District of Kentucky
    • December 18, 1978
    ...to the accident in litigation — a new regulation published at 38 Fed.Reg. 4976 (Friday, February 23, 1973), and later codified at 30 C.F.R. § 75.1722 (July, 1973), became effective, requiring in relevant part that "(a) . . . tail . . . pulleys . . . which may be contacted by persons, and wh......
  • Secretary of Labor v. Ohio Valley Coal Co., 03-1070.
    • United States
    • United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (District of Columbia)
    • February 24, 2004
    ...sought a penalty of $50,000. Ohio Valley conceded the first citation, for removing the guarding on the belt drive, in violation of 30 C.F.R. § 75.1722(a). See Ohio Page 534 Coal Co., 24 F.M.S.H.R.C. at 1075. However, the company challenged the second citation, issued pursuant to 30 C.F.R. §......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT