29 CFR 1926.602 - Material handling equipment
| Cite as | 29 CFR 1926.602 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
17 practice notes
-
Part II
...machinery is such that one standard could not be readily designed to suit both. It should be noted that another construction standard, 29 CFR 1926.602 in subpart Vehicles, Mechanized Equipment, and Marine Operations, covers material handling equipment. Proposed paragraph (c)(3) excludes aut......
-
Long v. Deere & Co., No. 57864
...the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) requires seat belts to be provided on crawler-tractors equipped with a ROPS. 29 C.F.R. § 1926.602 (1985). And as with automobiles, the user of the equipment has no duty to use an available seat belt. Under this theory it is unnecessar......
-
Donovan v. Royal Logging Co., Nos. 79-7622
...equipment in an operation where there was exposure to hazardous conditions and where the use of such equipment is required by 29 C.F.R. 1926.602(a)(2)(i) to reduce the hazard to employees. (1) Part 1926 sets the safety standards for the construction industry. Royal contested the citation an......
-
Lucas Coal Co. v. Interior Bd. of Mine Operations Appeals, No. 74-1813
...513 F.2d 201, 204 (3d Cir. 1975). 14 Budd Co. v. Occupational Safety and Health Review Comm'n, 513 F.2d 201, 205 (3d Cir. 1975). 15 29 C.F.R. § 1926.602(a)(9)(ii) (1974). 16 2 IBMA 226, 1973-1974 OSHD P 16,618 (1973). 17 See footnotes 13 & 14 Supra and accompanying text. 18 Southern Pac......
Request a trial to view additional results
11 cases
-
Long v. Deere & Co., No. 57864
...the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) requires seat belts to be provided on crawler-tractors equipped with a ROPS. 29 C.F.R. § 1926.602 (1985). And as with automobiles, the user of the equipment has no duty to use an available seat belt. Under this theory it is unnecessar......
-
Donovan v. Royal Logging Co., Nos. 79-7622
...equipment in an operation where there was exposure to hazardous conditions and where the use of such equipment is required by 29 C.F.R. 1926.602(a)(2)(i) to reduce the hazard to employees. (1) Part 1926 sets the safety standards for the construction industry. Royal contested the citation an......
-
Lucas Coal Co. v. Interior Bd. of Mine Operations Appeals, No. 74-1813
...513 F.2d 201, 204 (3d Cir. 1975). 14 Budd Co. v. Occupational Safety and Health Review Comm'n, 513 F.2d 201, 205 (3d Cir. 1975). 15 29 C.F.R. § 1926.602(a)(9)(ii) (1974). 16 2 IBMA 226, 1973-1974 OSHD P 16,618 (1973). 17 See footnotes 13 & 14 Supra and accompanying text. 18 Southern Pacific......
-
Donovan v. A. Amorello & Sons, Inc., No. 84-1568
...operation a reverse signal alarm distinguishable from the surrounding noise level or an employee signals that it is safe to do so. 29 C.F.R. Sec. 1926.602(a)(9)(ii). The administrative body that adjudicates these disputes (called the Occupational Safety and Health Review Commission, or "OSH......
Request a trial to view additional results