Loss mitigation procedures

CurrencyCurrent through May 31, 2023
Citation 12 C.F.R. §1024.41
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
2 cases
  • Mikulski v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., Case No. 17-CV-179
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Eastern District of Wisconsin
    • August 25, 2017
    ...(ECF No. 19, ¶ 33.) It alleges that Selene failed to comply with the standard of professional conductfor mortgage bankers set forth in 12 C.F.R. 1024.41 by not using "reasonable diligence in gathering information for Mikulski's modification application" and by mishandling the modification. ......
  • Rojecki v. Bank of Am., N.A.
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — District of New Jersey
    • June 28, 2016
    ...sale date." (Id. at 2-3). The Court declines to dismiss Rojecki's RESPA claim based on BANA's arguments. Under RESPA's "Regulation X," 12 C.F.R. § 1024.41, a loan servicer cannot refer a mortgage for foreclosure proceedings under certain circumstances. See, e.g., Beard v. HSBC Mortg. Servs.......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT