49 CFR 229.129 - Locomotive horn
| Cite as | 49 CFR 229.129 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
64 practice notes
-
Carter v. Nat'l R.R. Passenger Corp., Case No. 13-cv-00809-JCS
...operation claims, both on the grounds of preemption and on the merits. Id. at 21-23. First, Defendants reject Plaintiffs' reliance on 49 C.F.R. § 229.129, which sets a minimal decibel level for locomotive horns at 96dB(A) at 100 feet forward of the locomotive in the direction of travel. Id.......
-
Carter v. Nat'l R.R. Passenger Corp., Case No. 13–cv–00809–JCS
...operation claims, both on the grounds of preemption and on the merits. Id. at 21–23. First, Defendants reject Plaintiffs' reliance on 49 C.F.R. § 229.129, which sets a minimal decibel level for locomotive horns at 96dB(A) at 100 feet forward of the locomotive in the direction of travel. Id.......
-
Marsh v. Norfolk S., Inc., CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:14–CV–02331
...horn produced a minimum sound level of 96 dB(a) at 100 feet forward of the locomotive in its direction of travel, pursuant to 49 C.F.R. § 229.129 ;(m) Norfolk Southern knew or should have known of the potential for pedestrians walking alongside and/or upon the tracks, and in this specific i......
-
Civil City of South Bend, Ind. v. Conrail, No. 3:95-CV-29RM.
...of nor adopts the railroad's operating rules. 9 F.3d at 812 n. 5. The court finds the Ninth Circuit's reasoning persuasive. c. 49 C.F.R. § 229.129 Conrail next contends, relying on Norfolk S. Ry. Co. v. City of Hapeville, 779 F.Supp. 601 (N.D.Ga.1991), that 49 C.F.R. § 229.129 preempts the ......
Request a trial to view additional results
35 cases
-
Carter v. Nat'l R.R. Passenger Corp., Case No. 13-cv-00809-JCS
...operation claims, both on the grounds of preemption and on the merits. Id. at 21-23. First, Defendants reject Plaintiffs' reliance on 49 C.F.R. § 229.129, which sets a minimal decibel level for locomotive horns at 96dB(A) at 100 feet forward of the locomotive in the direction of travel. Id.......
-
Carter v. Nat'l R.R. Passenger Corp., Case No. 13–cv–00809–JCS
...operation claims, both on the grounds of preemption and on the merits. Id. at 21–23. First, Defendants reject Plaintiffs' reliance on 49 C.F.R. § 229.129, which sets a minimal decibel level for locomotive horns at 96dB(A) at 100 feet forward of the locomotive in the direction of travel. Id.......
-
Marsh v. Norfolk S., Inc., CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:14–CV–02331
...horn produced a minimum sound level of 96 dB(a) at 100 feet forward of the locomotive in its direction of travel, pursuant to 49 C.F.R. § 229.129 ;(m) Norfolk Southern knew or should have known of the potential for pedestrians walking alongside and/or upon the tracks, and in this specific i......
-
Civil City of South Bend, Ind. v. Conrail, No. 3:95-CV-29RM.
...of nor adopts the railroad's operating rules. 9 F.3d at 812 n. 5. The court finds the Ninth Circuit's reasoning persuasive. c. 49 C.F.R. § 229.129 Conrail next contends, relying on Norfolk S. Ry. Co. v. City of Hapeville, 779 F.Supp. 601 (N.D.Ga.1991), that 49 C.F.R. § 229.129 preempts the ......
Request a trial to view additional results
1 firm's commentaries
-
A Year-End Summary of Recent Railroad Preemption Cases
...the requirements for locomotive horn audibility and the accompanying procedure to test compliance with those requirements. See, e.g., 49 C.F.R. 229.129. Cases that have recently evaluated horn audibility claims Ryder v. Union Pac. R.R. Co., No. CV 15-431-SDD-EWD, 2017 WL 4364412 (M.D. La. S......
28 provisions
-
Occupational noise exposure; railroad operating employees,
...DOT/VNTSC/FHWA-96-5 (1996) for the specific FHWA criteria and recommendations. \79\ See e.g., 49 CFR 393.94(c)(4); 40 CFR 201.22(a); 49 CFR 229.129(b). Test Site This section sets forth the requirements for the testing site where in-cab static measurements are conducted. This section specif......
-
Part II
...DOT/VNTSC/FHWA-96-5 (1996) for the specific FHWA criteria and recommendations. \79\ See e.g., 49 CFR 393.94(c)(4); 40 CFR 201.22(a); 49 CFR 229.129(b). Test Site This section sets forth the requirements for the testing site where in-cab static measurements are conducted. This section specif......
-
Part II
...(1996) for the specific FHWA criteria and recommendations. \77\ See e.g., 49 CFR 393.94(c)(4); 40 CFR 201.22(a); and 49 CFR 229.129(b). Test Site This section sets forth the requirements for the testing site where in-cab static measurements are conducted. This section specifies the placemen......
-
Occupational noise exposure for railroad operating employees,
...(1996) for the specific FHWA criteria and recommendations. \77\ See e.g., 49 CFR 393.94(c)(4); 40 CFR 201.22(a); and 49 CFR 229.129(b). Test Site This section sets forth the requirements for the testing site where in-cab static measurements are conducted. This section specifies the placemen......
Request a trial to view additional results