30 CFR 77.1605 - Loading and haulage equipment; installations
| Cite as | 30 CFR 77.1605 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
11 practice notes
-
Sand Hill Energy, Inc. v. Ford Motor Co., No. 1999-SC-1028-DG.
...77.404(a); 3. Citation No. 4041301 was issued for the park brake being inoperative on the 1977 Ford, Model F-250 truck, in violation of 30 CFR 77.1605(b). The jury found that the accident was caused solely by the defective design of the transmission system installed by Ford in the F-250 pic......
-
Raymer v. U.S., No. 80-3033
...were negligent in not citing Peabody for failure to provide berms and guardrails on the elevated levee road, a claimed requirement of 30 C.F.R. § 77.1605(k) The district court rendered two decisions in this case. In the first it entered an order and memorandum opinion denying the government......
-
Wilmot Min. Co. v. Secretary of Labor, No. 87-3480
...utilized in surface coal mines must be equipped with rollover protective structures. Finally, the ALJ found that Wilmot violated 30 C.F.R. Sec. 77.1605(b), which requires mobile equipment to be equipped with adequate The ALJ also assessed civil penalties for these violations. He found that,......
-
Peabody Midwest Mining, LLC v. Fed. Mine Safety & Health Review Comm'n, No. 13–1659.
...LLC) for violating a federal regulation requiring a protective mound, or “berm,” along “the outer bank of elevated roadways.” See30 C.F.R. §§ 77.1605(k), 77.2(d). Black Beauty contested the citation [762 F.3d 613]before an Administrative Law Judge of the Federal Mine Safety and Health Revie......
Request a trial to view additional results
8 cases
-
Sand Hill Energy, Inc. v. Ford Motor Co., No. 1999-SC-1028-DG.
...77.404(a); 3. Citation No. 4041301 was issued for the park brake being inoperative on the 1977 Ford, Model F-250 truck, in violation of 30 CFR 77.1605(b). The jury found that the accident was caused solely by the defective design of the transmission system installed by Ford in the F-250 pic......
-
Raymer v. U.S., No. 80-3033
...were negligent in not citing Peabody for failure to provide berms and guardrails on the elevated levee road, a claimed requirement of 30 C.F.R. § 77.1605(k) The district court rendered two decisions in this case. In the first it entered an order and memorandum opinion denying the government......
-
Wilmot Min. Co. v. Secretary of Labor, No. 87-3480
...utilized in surface coal mines must be equipped with rollover protective structures. Finally, the ALJ found that Wilmot violated 30 C.F.R. Sec. 77.1605(b), which requires mobile equipment to be equipped with adequate The ALJ also assessed civil penalties for these violations. He found that,......
-
Peabody Midwest Mining, LLC v. Fed. Mine Safety & Health Review Comm'n, No. 13–1659.
...LLC) for violating a federal regulation requiring a protective mound, or “berm,” along “the outer bank of elevated roadways.” See30 C.F.R. §§ 77.1605(k), 77.2(d). Black Beauty contested the citation [762 F.3d 613]before an Administrative Law Judge of the Federal Mine Safety and Health Revie......
Request a trial to view additional results
1 firm's commentaries
-
MSHA Begins New Enhanced Enforcement Program in Coal and Metal/Nonmetal
...for unattended equipment 30 CFR 56/57/14100(a) Inspection of mobile equipment 30 CFR 77.1606(a) Inspection of mobile equipment 30 CFR 77.1605(b) Mobile equipment: brakes 30 CFR 56/57.14101(a)(3) Brakes 30 CFR 46.11 Site-specific hazard awareness training At the time of publishing this blog ......