43 CFR 46.210 - Listing of Departmental categorical exclusions

Cite as43 CFR 46.210
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
292 practice notes
  • Rights-of-Way on Indian Land
    • United States
    • Federal Register November 19, 2015
    • November 19, 2015
    ...to lend themselves to meaningful analysis and will later be subject to the NEPA process, either collectively or case-by-case.'' 43 CFR 46.210(j). No extraordinary circumstances exist that would require greater NEPA review. This rule does not require BIA approval of any new types of major Fe......
  • Tribal Transportation Program
    • United States
    • Federal Register November 07, 2016
    • November 7, 2016
    ...significantly affecting the quality of the human environment because it is of an administrative, technical, and procedural nature. See 43 CFR 46.210(i). Effects on the Energy Supply (E.O. 13211) This rulemaking is not a significant energy action under the definition in E.O. 13211. A Stateme......
  • Reorganization of Title 30:
    • United States
    • Federal Register October 18, 2011
    • October 18, 2011
    ...of the National Environmental Policy Act, 43 CFR Part 46 and 516 Departmental Manual 15. This rule meets the criteria set forth in 43 CFR 46.210(i) in that this proposed rule is ``* * * of an administrative, financial, legal, technical, or procedural nature * *.'' This rule also meets the c......
  • Indian Child Welfare Act Proceedings
    • United States
    • Federal Register June 14, 2016
    • June 14, 2016
    ...significantly affecting the quality of the human environment because it is of an administrative, technical, and procedural nature. See, 43 CFR 46.210(i). No extraordinary circumstances exist that would require greater review under the National Environmental Policy Act. Effects on the Energy......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
19 cases
2 firm's commentaries
  • Renewable Energy Case Law Update
    • United States
    • JD Supra United States
    • February 11, 2016
    ...9 See id. at *16. (citing 77 Fed. Reg. 22,267, 22,275 (Apr. 13, 2012)). 10 Id. at *28. (citing 78 Fed. Reg. at 73,721-22 (quoting 43 C.F.R. § 46.210(i))). Id. 12 Id. 4 any potentially significant environmental effects on future protection of eagles or other environmental resources,” and tha......
  • Eagles Back in the Nest: FWS 30-Year Eagle “Take” Rule Vacated Less than Two Years after Implementation
    • United States
    • JD Supra United States
    • September 4, 2015
    ...either collectively or case-by-case,” are categorically excluded from NEPA review unless any extraordinary circumstances apply.14 43 C.F.R. § 46.210(i). The court rejected the Service’s reliance on the CatEx, finding that “because [the Service] did not adequately explain its reliance on... ......
1 books & journal articles
  • Modernizing the NEPA Process in the Context of the Gulf Disaster
    • United States
    • Environmental Law Reporter Nbr. 40-11, November 2010
    • November 1, 2010
    ...and Fire Rehabilitation Projects (Feb. 10, 2009), http://www.blm.gov/or/districts/salem/plans/iles/ PlmCrVlstzRWA_Amnd_CX.pdf. 18. 43 C.F.R. §46.210 (2008). See also U.S. DOI, NEPA Categorical Exclusion Review, http://www.boemre.gov/eppd/compliance/nepa/policy/ce/index.htm. MMS uses. Resour......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT