29 CFR 1630.5 - Limiting, segregating, and classifying

Cite as29 CFR 1630.5
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
16 practice notes
  • Iwata v. Intel Corporation, 120804 MADC, 04-10536-WGY
    • United States
    • Federal Cases United States District Courts 1st Circuit United States District Courts. 1st Circuit. District of Massachusetts
    • 8 Diciembre 2004
    ...C.F.R. pt. 1630, entitled "Interpretive Guidance on Title I of the Americans With Disabilities Act, " notes with respect to 29 C.F.R. § 1630.5 that "it would be permissible for an employer to offer an insurance policy that limits coverage for certain procedures or treatments,......
  • 349 F.Supp.2d 135 (D.Mass. 2004), Civ. A. 04-10536, Iwata v. Intel Corp.
    • United States
    • Federal Cases United States District Courts 1st Circuit United States District Courts. 1st Circuit. District of Massachusetts
    • 8 Diciembre 2004
    ...29 C.F.R. pt. 1630, entitled "Interpretive Guidance on Title I of the Americans With Disabilities Act," notes with respect to 29 C.F.R. § 1630.5 that "it would be permissible for an employer to offer an insurance policy that limits coverage for certain procedures or treatment......
  • 349 F.Supp.2d 135 (D.Mass. 2004), Civ. A. 04-10536, Iwata v. Intel Corp.
    • United States
    • Federal Cases United States District Courts 1st Circuit United States District Courts. 1st Circuit. District of Massachusetts
    • 8 Diciembre 2004
    ...29 C.F.R. pt. 1630, entitled "Interpretive Guidance on Title I of the Americans With Disabilities Act," notes with respect to 29 C.F.R. § 1630.5 that "it would be permissible for an employer to offer an insurance policy that limits coverage for certain procedures or treatment......
  • 74 F.Supp.2d 1067 (N.D.Ala. 1999), CV 97-BU-1897, Mullins v. Crowell
    • United States
    • Federal Cases United States District Courts 11th Circuit United States District Court of Northern District of Alabama
    • 21 Septiembre 1999
    ...for the hiring, placement and advancement of disabled individuals. The statutory provision is violated, the Plaintiffs allege, citing 29 C.F.R. § 1630.5, because the requirement of an affirmative action program creates a duty that TVA not discriminate by segregating its employees in a way t......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
15 cases
  • 349 F.Supp.2d 135 (D.Mass. 2004), Civ. A. 04-10536, Iwata v. Intel Corp.
    • United States
    • Federal Cases United States District Courts 1st Circuit District of Massachusetts
    • 8 Diciembre 2004
    ...29 C.F.R. pt. 1630, entitled "Interpretive Guidance on Title I of the Americans With Disabilities Act," notes with respect to 29 C.F.R. § 1630.5 that "it would be permissible for an employer to offer an insurance policy that limits coverage for certain procedures or treatment......
  • 349 F.Supp.2d 135 (D.Mass. 2004), Civ. A. 04-10536, Iwata v. Intel Corp.
    • United States
    • Federal Cases United States District Courts 1st Circuit District of Massachusetts
    • 8 Diciembre 2004
    ...29 C.F.R. pt. 1630, entitled "Interpretive Guidance on Title I of the Americans With Disabilities Act," notes with respect to 29 C.F.R. § 1630.5 that "it would be permissible for an employer to offer an insurance policy that limits coverage for certain procedures or treatment......
  • Iwata v. Intel Corporation, 120804 MADC, 04-10536-WGY
    • United States
    • Federal Cases United States District Courts 1st Circuit District of Massachusetts
    • 8 Diciembre 2004
    ...C.F.R. pt. 1630, entitled "Interpretive Guidance on Title I of the Americans With Disabilities Act, " notes with respect to 29 C.F.R. § 1630.5 that "it would be permissible for an employer to offer an insurance policy that limits coverage for certain procedures or treatments,......
  • 74 F.Supp.2d 1067 (N.D.Ala. 1999), CV 97-BU-1897, Mullins v. Crowell
    • United States
    • Federal Cases United States District Courts 11th Circuit Northern District of Alabama
    • 21 Septiembre 1999
    ...for the hiring, placement and advancement of disabled individuals. The statutory provision is violated, the Plaintiffs allege, citing 29 C.F.R. § 1630.5, because the requirement of an affirmative action program creates a duty that TVA not discriminate by segregating its employees in a way t......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
1 provisions
  • Affirmative Action for Individuals With Disabilities in Federal Employment
    • United States
    • Federal Register January 03, 2017
    • 3 Enero 2017
    ...behavior under 29 CFR 1614.106. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \102\ 42 U.S.C. 12112(b)(1); 29 CFR 1630.5. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Some commenters stated that the Rule should establish a deadlin......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT