29 CFR 1910.1025 - Lead
| Cite as | 29 CFR 1910.1025 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
95 practice notes
-
Separate Parts In This Issue
Part II
Housing and Urban Development Department,
...with Federal Policy for the Protection of Human Subjects, codified by HUD at 24 CFR part 60; and (6) The requirements of OSHA (e.g., 29 CFR part 1910 and/or 1926, as applicable) or the State or local occupational safety and health regulations, whichever are most stringent, will be (7) If an......
-
Grants and cooperative agreements; availability, etc.:
Discretionary grant programs (SuperNOFA),
...with Federal Policy for the Protection of Human Subjects, codified by HUD at 24 CFR part 60; and (6) The requirements of OSHA (e.g., 29 CFR part 1910 and/or 1926, as applicable) or the State or local occupational safety and health regulations, whichever are most stringent, will be (7) If an......
-
Safety and health standards, etc.:
Standards improvement project (Phase II),
...standards; semiannual updating of compliance plans in the standards for vinyl chloride, inorganic arsenic, lead for general industry (29 CFR 1910.1025) and construction (29 CFR 1926.62), DBCP, and acrylonitrile; and employee notification requirements in general industry standards for asbest......
-
Deepwater ports:
Regulations; revision,
...(c) The deepwater port operator must ensure that measures for protection from exposure to inorganic lead are taken in compliance with 29 CFR 1910.1025. Fall Sec. 150.619 What are the fall arrest system requirements? (a) The deepwater port operator must ensure that all personnel who are expo......
Request a trial to view additional results
30 cases
-
Mass. Bldg. Trades Council v. United States Dep't of Labor, Occupational Safety & Health Admin. (In re MCP No. 165, Occupational Safety & Health Admin.), 21-7000
...even on narrowly economic grounds more regulation than would be necessary in the case of a noncommunicable disease"); see also 29 C.F.R. § 1910.1025 (OSHA regulates workplace exposure to lead). Longstanding precedent addressing the plain language of the Act, OSHA's interpretations of the st......
-
International Union, United Auto. Aerospace and Agr. Implement Workers of America UAW v. Johnson Controls, Inc., AFL-CI
...require employers to make respirators available, so that both men and women desiring children can reduce their blood lead levels. 29 C.F.R. Sec. 1910.1025(f)(1)(iii). They also require employers to conduct annual educational programs "with particular attention to the adverse reproductive ef......
-
Mexican Gulf Fishing Co. v. U.S. Dep't of Commerce, CIVIL ACTION NO. 20-2312
...203 (5th Cir. 1989) (same).119 United Steelworkers , 828 F.2d at 317-18.120 Id. at 316-17.121 Id. at 316 (emphasis added) (quoting 29 C.F.R. § 1910.1025(k)(2)(ii) (1987) )122 Id. at 317.123 Id.124 Id. at 318 (quoting Exposure to Lead, 42 Fed. Reg. 46,547, 46548 (proposed Sept. 16, 1977) (to......
-
Mass. Building Trades Council v. U.S. Dep't of Labor (In re MCP No. 165), s. 21-7000/4027
...even on narrowly economic grounds more regulation than would be necessary in the case of a noncommunicable disease"); see also 29 C.F.R. § 1910.1025 (OSHA regulates workplace exposure to lead).Longstanding precedent addressing the plain language of the Act, OSHA's interpretations of the sta......
Request a trial to view additional results
1 firm's commentaries
-
Lower Blood Lead Levels On OSHA's To-Do List
...Lead Levels ("BLLs") require medical removal seeks public comment on reducing those levels across both the Agency's general industry (29 CFR 1910.1025) and construction (29 CFR 1926.62) lead standards. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention have published studies suggesting that the......
1 books & journal articles
-
Paralyzing Discord: Workplace Safety, Paternalism, and the Accommodation of Biological Variance in the Americans with Disabilities Act
...to survive."). [215] Johnson Controls, 499 U.S. at 208, 111 S. Ct. at 1208; citing 43 Fed. Reg. 52,952, at 52,966 (1978); see 29 C.F.R. § 1910.1025(k)(1)(ii) [216] Johnson Controls, 499 U.S. at 208, 111 S. Ct. at 1208. [217] Chevron U.S.A. Inc. v. Echazabal, 536 U.S. 73, 85, 122 S. Ct. 2045......