37 CFR 1.52 - Language, paper, writing, margins, compact disc specifications

Cite as37 CFR 1.52
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
38 practice notes
  • Patent cases: Patent business goals; implementation,
    • United States
    • Federal Register October 05, 1998
    • October 5, 1998
    ...delayed submission of an oath or declaration, and changing time period for submission of the basic filing fee and English translation (37 CFR 1.52, (4) Limiting the number of claims in an application (37 CFR 1.75); (5) Harmonizing standards for patent drawings (37 CFR 1.84); (6) Printing pa......
  • Legal Framework for Electronic Filing System - Web (EFS-Web)
    • United States
    • Federal Register October 27, 2009
    • October 27, 2009
    ...entered into IFW after being rendered by EFS-Web for purposes of determining the application size fee required by 37 CFR 1.16(s). See 37 CFR 1.52(f)(2) and MPEP Sec. 607. The paper size equivalency under 37 CFR 1.52(f)(2) for EFS-Web filings does not apply to national stage submissions. See......
  • Setting and Adjusting Patent Fees During Fiscal Year 2017
    • United States
    • Federal Register November 14, 2017
    • November 14, 2017
    ...such as Arial, Times New Roman, or Courier; (iv) a font size no smaller than 12 point; (v) margins which conform to the requirements of 37 CFR 1.52(a)(1)(ii); and (vi) sufficient clarity and contrast to permit direct reproduction and electronic capture by use of digital imaging and optical ......
  • Tafas v. Doll, No. 2008-1352.
    • United States
    • United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
    • March 20, 2009
    ...conclude that consistency with the Patent Act is not the touchstone of whether the rules are procedural or substantive. For example, 37 C.F.R. § 1.52(a)(1)(i) requires most documents submitted to the USPTO to be printed on white paper. No one would dispute that this rule is procedural. If C......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
14 cases
  • Tafas v. Doll, No. 2008-1352.
    • United States
    • United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
    • March 20, 2009
    ...conclude that consistency with the Patent Act is not the touchstone of whether the rules are procedural or substantive. For example, 37 C.F.R. § 1.52(a)(1)(i) requires most documents submitted to the USPTO to be printed on white paper. No one would dispute that this rule is procedural. If C......
  • Halliburton Co. v. Dow Chemical Co., No. 74-1343
    • United States
    • United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (10th Circuit)
    • April 28, 1975
    ...Dow patent counsel may have made an error of judgment, but we find no evidence of a deceptive intent. Patent Office Rule 52(c), 37 C.F.R. § 1.52(c), says that alterations are impermissible after execution of the patent papers. Patent Office Rule 56, 37 C.F.R. § 1.56 provides that "any ......
  • Strava, Inc. v. Icon Health & Fitness, Inc., Appeal 2015-004767
    • United States
    • United States Patent and Trademark Office. United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board
    • January 31, 2018
    ...on the briefs. Nevertheless, the practice is not expressly forbidden by the rules governing inter partes reexaminations. See, e.g., 37 C.F.R. § 1.52; 37 C.F.R. § 1.943; 37 C.F.R. §41.68. --------- ...
  • Ex parte Bertrand, Appeal 2017-006467[1]
    • United States
    • United States Patent and Trademark Office. United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board
    • January 26, 2018
    ...See Ans. 2-5. [3] Separately, we note Appellants' Briefs appear to be printed with a pattern of missing portions of the text fonts. See 37 C.F.R. 1.52(a)(1)(iv) and 37 C.F.R. 1.52(a)(1)(v). --------- ...
  • Request a trial to view additional results
3 firm's commentaries
  • Proposed Rules for Supplemental Examinations Under the America Invents Act
    • United States
    • JD Supra United States
    • February 13, 2012
    ...additional 50 sheets or a fraction thereof). – Cannot print on both sides because rules state that papers must be in compliance with 37 C.F.R. §1.52, (see 37 C.F.R. §1.615(a)), which requires writing on only one side in portrait orientation. 1.610(b) -A request for supplemental examination ......
  • USPTO Extends Missing Parts Pilot Program for Another Year
    • United States
    • JD Supra United States
    • December 29, 2016
    ...37 CFR 1.63 or an application data sheet containing the information specified in 37 CFR 1.63(b); (3) a specification in compliance with 37 CFR 1.52; (4) an abstract in compliance with 37 CFR 1.72(b); (5) drawings in compliance with 37 CFR 1.84 (if applicable); (6) any application size fee r......
  • China Intellectual Property Quarterly Newsletter - June 4, 2009
    • United States
    • JD Supra United States
    • June 4, 2009
    ...one year after the filing date so translation costs can be of deferred date with minimum cost. This the first provisional as well. See 37 CFR 1.52(d)(1) (“If priority date is recognized around the application. a provisional application is filed in globe, and the applicant may claim The prov......
2 forms
  • Transmittal Form-SB/21
    • United States
    • United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board
    • Invalid date
    ...Table on CD Certified Copy of Priority Document(s) Remarks Reply to Missing Parts/ Incomplete Application Reply to Missing Parts under 37 CFR 1.52 or SIGNATURE OF APPLICANT, ATTORNEY, OR AGENT Firm Name Signature Printed name Date Reg. No. CERTIFICATE OF TRANSMISSION/MAILING I hereby certif......
  • Fee Transmittal-SB/17
    • United States
    • United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board
    • Invalid date
    ...SIZE FEE If the specification and drawings exceed 100 sheets of paper (excluding electronically filed sequence or computer listings under 37 CFR 1.52(e)), the application size fee due is $420 ($210 for small entity) ($105 for micro entity) for each additional 50 sheets or fraction thereof. ......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT