25 CFR 151.3 - Land acquisition policy

Cite as25 CFR 151.3
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
59 practice notes
  • Preservation of Los Olivos v. Dept. of Interior, Case No. CV 06-1502 AHM (CTx).
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. 9th Circuit. United States District Courts. 9th Circuit. Central District of California
    • July 8, 2008
    ...that the acquisition of the land is necessary to facilitate tribal self-determination, economic development, or Indian housing." 25 C.F.R. § 151.3. In its initial application, the Tribe proposed to develop the 6.9 acres as a tribal administration and community center. After the remains of a......
  • Self v. Cher-Ae Heights Indian Cmty. of the Trinidad Rancheria, A158632
    • United States
    • California Court of Appeals
    • January 26, 2021
    ...263 recognizes that tribes may acquire land for sovereign purposes beyond the borders of a reservation. (See 25 U.S.C. § 5108 ; 25 C.F.R. § 151.3(a).) This further distinguishes tribal land acquisition from that of states and foreign sovereigns.Decades after the enactment of the Indian Reor......
  • Stand Up for Cal.! v. State, F069302
    • United States
    • California Court of Appeals
    • December 12, 2016
    ...United States Code Service section 5108. Without this acceptance, the land cannot be considered as held in trust by the United States. (25 C.F.R. § 151.3 ["No acquisition of land in trust status, including a transfer of land already held in trust or restricted status, shall be valid unless ......
  • Warren v. United States ., 06-CV-226S
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. 2nd Circuit. United States District Court of Western District of New York
    • March 12, 2012
    ...that the "Federal Defendants'" decisions to confer restricted fee status on certain land in Niagara Falls and Buffalo were contrary to 25 CFR § 151.3.4 (Am. Compl. ¶¶ 100, 102-03.) In the proposed second amended pleading, Plaintiff states more specifically that the NIGC Chairman failed to m......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
54 cases
  • Preservation of Los Olivos v. Dept. of Interior, Case No. CV 06-1502 AHM (CTx).
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. 9th Circuit. United States District Courts. 9th Circuit. Central District of California
    • July 8, 2008
    ...that the acquisition of the land is necessary to facilitate tribal self-determination, economic development, or Indian housing." 25 C.F.R. § 151.3. In its initial application, the Tribe proposed to develop the 6.9 acres as a tribal administration and community center. After the remains of a......
  • Self v. Cher-Ae Heights Indian Cmty. of the Trinidad Rancheria, A158632
    • United States
    • California Court of Appeals
    • January 26, 2021
    ...263 recognizes that tribes may acquire land for sovereign purposes beyond the borders of a reservation. (See 25 U.S.C. § 5108 ; 25 C.F.R. § 151.3(a).) This further distinguishes tribal land acquisition from that of states and foreign sovereigns.Decades after the enactment of the Indian Reor......
  • Stand Up for Cal.! v. State, F069302
    • United States
    • California Court of Appeals
    • December 12, 2016
    ...United States Code Service section 5108. Without this acceptance, the land cannot be considered as held in trust by the United States. (25 C.F.R. § 151.3 ["No acquisition of land in trust status, including a transfer of land already held in trust or restricted status, shall be valid unless ......
  • Warren v. United States ., 06-CV-226S
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. 2nd Circuit. United States District Court of Western District of New York
    • March 12, 2012
    ...that the "Federal Defendants'" decisions to confer restricted fee status on certain land in Niagara Falls and Buffalo were contrary to 25 CFR § 151.3.4 (Am. Compl. ¶¶ 100, 102-03.) In the proposed second amended pleading, Plaintiff states more specifically that the NIGC Chairman failed to m......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
1 firm's commentaries

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT