29 C.F.R. 1910.23 - Ladders
| Cite as | 29 C.F.R. 1910.23 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
86 practice notes
-
Deepwater ports:
Regulations; revision,
...electrically energized cables or connectors, or water, are protected against such a fall by guardrails or other measures that comply with 29 CFR 1910.23 or 1910.28, or by the use of suitable lifesaving equipment that complies with 46 CFR part (b) In addition, the operator must take measures......
-
Part II
...energized cables or connectors, or water, are protected against such a fall either by guardrails or other measures that comply with 29 CFR 1910.23 or 1910.28, or by the use of suitable lifesaving equipment that complies with 46 CFR part 160. In addition, the operator must take measures to c......
-
Deepwater ports:
Regulations; revision,
...energized cables or connectors, or water, are protected against such a fall either by guardrails or other measures that comply with 29 CFR 1910.23 or 1910.28, or by the use of suitable lifesaving equipment that complies with 46 CFR part 160. In addition, the operator must take measures to c......
-
Walking-Working Surfaces and Personal Protective Equipment (Fall Protection Systems)
...of Sec. 1910.25 specify Page 82556 requirements for specific types of stairways. The general requirements in the existing rule (29 CFR 1910.23 and 1910.24) only apply to fixed industrial stairs. However, OSHA believes it is necessary to apply these general requirements to all stairways used......
Request a trial to view additional results
77 cases
-
Gammons v. City of N.Y.
...hazard” pursuant to that statute. Alternatively, the plaintiff argued that the defendants violated Labor Law § 27–a(3)(a)(2) and 29 CFR 1910.23(c)(1) by failing to equip the back of the truck with a railing. In addition, the plaintiff requested that the court search the record ( seeCPLR 321......
-
State v. Saturno, No. 19602.
...that cannot be quickly hidden or remedied”); see, e.g., 29 C.F.R. §§ 1910.36 (design and construction requirements for exit routes); 29 C.F.R. § 1910.23 (guarding floor and wall openings); 29 C.F.R. §§ 1910.160 (fixed extinguishing systems). Therefore, we find federal cases interpreting the......
-
Umansky v. Abc Ins. Co., No. 2007AP385.
...law doctrine of immunity for state employees. The plaintiffs contend Fox is not immune because (1) he had a ministerial duty under 29 C.F.R. § 1910.23(c)(1), incorporated by WIS. ADMIN. CODE §§ Comm 32.15 (Mar.1999) and 32.50 (July 2002),1 to have a rail on the platform from which Umansky f......
-
Schultz v. NORTHEAST ILL. REGIONAL COMMUTER RAILROAD CORP., No. 90770
...(Emphasis in original.) 45 U.S.C. § 53 (1994). On cross-appeal, plaintiff argues that defendant violated standard 1910.23(c) of OSHA (29 C.F.R. § 1910.23(c) (1993)), a "statute enacted for the safety of employees," when it failed to install a guardrail above the retaining wall. Therefore, p......
Request a trial to view additional results