37 CFR 41.127 - Judgment
| Cite as | 37 CFR 41.127 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
174 practice notes
-
Enzo Therapeutics v. Yeda Research and Dev. Co., Civil Action No. 2:06cv377.
...indicated that it would seek review of the Board's decision. On April 18, 2006, Enzo filed a Request for Adverse Judgment Pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 41.127(b), which the Board granted on May 2, 2006, effectively concluding the administrative proceedings regarding the B. Summary of Claims Enzo'......
-
Enzo Therapeutics v. Yeda Research and Dev. Co., Civil Action No. 2:06cv377.
...of unpatentability" of its claims. Two days thereafter, on April 18, 2006, Enzo filed a Request for Adverse Judgment Pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 41.127(b), which the Board granted on May 2, 2006, effectively concluding the administrative proceedings for the 12. The Court expresses no opinion on......
-
Mayo Found. for Med. Educ. & Research v. Iancu, 2018-2031
...Action, dated June 30, 2014, Paper No. 12-1, at 2) (underline in original).PTO Regulations Authorize post-interference examination: 37 C.F.R. § 41.127(c). The [interference] judgment may include a recommendation for further action by the examiner or by the Director. If the Board recommends ......
-
University of Western Australia v. Academisch Ziekenhuis Leiden, Patent Interference 106
...& Timbers, LLP Before: RICHARD E. SCHAFER, SALLY GARDNER LANE, and DEBORAH KATZ, Administrative Patent Judges JUDGMENT - MOTIONS - 37 CFR § 41.127 SCHAFER, Administrative Patent Judge. In view of the DECISION ON MOTIONS (Paper 472), it is- ORDERED that judgment be entered against junior par......
Request a trial to view additional results
139 cases
-
Enzo Therapeutics v. Yeda Research and Dev. Co., Civil Action No. 2:06cv377.
...indicated that it would seek review of the Board's decision. On April 18, 2006, Enzo filed a Request for Adverse Judgment Pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 41.127(b), which the Board granted on May 2, 2006, effectively concluding the administrative proceedings regarding the B. Summary of Claims Enzo'......
-
Enzo Therapeutics v. Yeda Research and Dev. Co., Civil Action No. 2:06cv377.
...of unpatentability" of its claims. Two days thereafter, on April 18, 2006, Enzo filed a Request for Adverse Judgment Pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 41.127(b), which the Board granted on May 2, 2006, effectively concluding the administrative proceedings for the 12. The Court expresses no opinion on......
-
Mayo Found. for Med. Educ. & Research v. Iancu, 2018-2031
...Action, dated June 30, 2014, Paper No. 12-1, at 2) (underline in original).PTO Regulations Authorize post-interference examination: 37 C.F.R. § 41.127(c). The [interference] judgment may include a recommendation for further action by the examiner or by the Director. If the Board recommends ......
-
University of Western Australia v. Academisch Ziekenhuis Leiden, Patent Interference 106
...& Timbers, LLP Before: RICHARD E. SCHAFER, SALLY GARDNER LANE, and DEBORAH KATZ, Administrative Patent Judges JUDGMENT - MOTIONS - 37 CFR § 41.127 SCHAFER, Administrative Patent Judge. In view of the DECISION ON MOTIONS (Paper 472), it is- ORDERED that judgment be entered against junior par......
Request a trial to view additional results
35 firm's commentaries
-
USPTO And Copyright Office Exercise Emergency Powers Granted By CARES Act To Provide Further Relief During COVID-19 Crisis
...deadline was or may be delayed due to the COVID-19 outbreak: a request for rehearing of a PTAB decision under 37 C.F.R. §§ 41.125(c), 41.127(d), or 42.71(d); a petition to the Chief Judge under 37 C.F.R. § 41.3; a patent owner preliminary response in a trial proceeding under 37 C.F.R. §§ 42......
-
PTAB Digest 2021/2022: The Latest Trends and Developments in Post-Grant Proceedings
...Toolgen Inc. and Sigma).1 Interference No. 106,115, paper 2863, Decision on Priority under 37 CFR 41.125(a); paper 2864, Judgment under 37 CFR 41.127.2 See, e.g., Interference No. 106,048, paper 1, Declaration under 37 C.F.R. 41.203(b).3 Interference No. 106,048, paper 77, Broad et al. Subs......
-
COVID-19: Patent and Trademark Office Updates as of April 22, 2020
...(1)(b), the PTAB shall provide a 30-day extension of time for: i) a request for rehearing of a PTAB decision under 37 C.F.R. §§ 41.125(c), 41.127(d), or ii) a petition to the Chief Judge under 37 C.F.R. § 41.3; or iii) a patent owner preliminary response in a trial proceeding under 37 C.F.R......
-
COVID-19: Patent and Trademark Office Updates as of April 1, 2020
...(1)(b), the PTAB shall provide a 30-day extension of time for: i) a request for rehearing of a PTAB decision under 37 C.F.R. §§ 41.125(c), 41.127(d), or ii) a petition to the Chief Judge under 37 C.F.R. § 41.3; or iii) a patent owner preliminary response in a trial proceeding under 37 C.F.R......
Request a trial to view additional results