29 CFR 825.106 - Joint employer coverage

Cite as29 CFR 825.106
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
146 practice notes
  • Family and Medical Leave Act; information request; report,
    • United States
    • Federal Register June 28, 2007
    • June 28, 2007
    ...rights under the Act, or discharge or discriminate against an employee for opposing a practice that is unlawful under FMLA. See 29 CFR 825.106(e). With regard to the term ``worksite,'' the legislative history states that it is to be construed in the same manner as the term ``single site of ......
  • Part IV
    • United States
    • Federal Register February 11, 2008
    • February 11, 2008
    ...could have FMLA rights at the retail chain. This creates an arbitrary distinction between sole and joint employers. . . .Under 29 C.F.R. Sec. 825.106(e), an employer could contract for an engineer, Employee A, for a six-month project, and then find out after the employee has only been there......
  • Application of the Fair Labor Standards Act to Domestic Service
    • United States
    • Federal Register October 01, 2013
    • October 1, 2013
    ...employment'' under the Migrant and Seasonal Agricultural Worker Protection Act, 29 CFR 500.20(h), and the Family and Medical Leave Act, 29 CFR 825.106, both of which incorporate the FLSA definition of To illustrate how a home care services scenario may be assessed utilizing the economic rea......
  • Family and Medical Leave Act of 1993,
    • United States
    • Federal Register February 11, 2008
    • February 11, 2008
    ...could have FMLA rights at the retail chain. This creates an arbitrary distinction between sole and joint employers. . . .Under 29 C.F.R. Sec. 825.106(e), an employer could contract for an engineer, Employee A, for a six-month project, and then find out after the employee has only been there......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
127 cases
  • Ensor v. Jenkins, Civil Action No. ELH-20-1266
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. 4th Circuit. United States District Court (Maryland)
    • March 25, 2021
    ...possibility of joint employment under the statute. See Quintana v. City of Alexandria, 692 F. App'x 122, 125 (4th Cir. 2017) (quoting 29 C.F.R. § 825.106(a)); Griffin v. Sirva Inc., 835 F.3d 283, 293 (2d Cir. 2016) (same). Under Butler, 793 F.3d at 414, courts consider nine factors to deter......
  • Grace v. Uscar, No. 06-2509.
    • United States
    • United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (6th Circuit)
    • March 26, 2008
    ...No. 4:06CV1751, 2007 WL 1306601, *5, 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 32710, *13 (N.D.Ohio May 3, 2007) ("Furthermore, the Court finds that 29 C.F.R. § 825.106 [addressing joint employment] is entitled to deference, given that it is consistent with the FMLA and necessary to carry out its purposes......
  • Gazda v. Pioneer Chlor Alkali Co., Inc., No. CIV. A. H-96-1265.
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. 5th Circuit. United States District Courts. 5th Circuit. Southern District of Texas
    • September 10, 1997
    ...interest in another corporation, it is a separate employer unless it meets the "joint employment" test discussed in 29 C.F.R. § 825.106, or the "integrated employer" test in 29 C.F.R. § 825.104(c)(2). See 29 C.F.R. § 42. See Exhibit 8 to Sieger Affidavit [Doc. # 42]. 43.......
  • Russell v. Bronson Heating and Cooling, No. 03-73871.
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. 6th Circuit. United States District Court (Eastern District of Michigan)
    • November 16, 2004
    ...will be viewed as a single employer of an employee provided they meet either the "joint employment" test discussed in 29 C.F.R. § 825.106, or the "integrated employer" test discussed in 29 C.F.R. § 825.104(c)(2). Under the "integrated employer" test, multiple c......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
9 firm's commentaries
  • Term Limits for Contingent Workers: Urban Legend or Necessary Fix?
    • United States
    • Mondaq United States
    • December 20, 2010
    ...Co. v Darden, 503 U.S. 318 (1992). 11 Burrey v. Pacific Gas & Electric, (unpublished order) No. C-95-4638DLJ (N.D. Cal. 1999). 12 29 C.F.R. § 825.106(e). 13 29 C.F.R. § 825.106(e); 29 C.F.R. § The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Spec......
  • 2008 Final Regulations for the FMLA: A Summary
    • United States
    • LexBlog United States
    • November 19, 2008
    ...to hire, fire, and assign work, a joint employer relationship is still likely to exist, “based on all the facts and circumstances.” 29 CFR § 825.106(b)(2). Employee Eligibility – To be eligible for FMLA protection, an employee must have worked with an employer for at least 12 months and for......
  • DOL, IRS, And 11 States Enter Agreement To Work Together Against Misclassification
    • United States
    • Mondaq United States
    • October 3, 2011
    ...temporary workers who have been engaged for many months or even years as covered "employees" under the FMLA regulations pursuant to 29 C.F.R. § 825.106. While we are by no means suggesting an uptick in such activity, there have been some reported decisions on these issues and, consequently,......
  • CFRA Joint Employers Beware
    • United States
    • JD Supra United States
    • August 7, 2015
    ...directly or indirectly, because one employer controls, is controlled by, or is under common control with the other employer. 29 C.F.R. § 825.106(a). The new CFRA regulation is identical to the FMLA regulation, with one exception—the California regulation adds the following single sentence t......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
2 books & journal articles
  • Vol. 10, No. 4, Pg. 38. Structuring and Managing Contingent Worker Arrangements.
    • United States
    • South Carolina Bar Journal Nbr. 1999, January 1999
    • January 1, 1999
    ...§ 2612. The DOL has issued regulations specifically addressing joint employment under the FMLA in the contingent worker context. See 29 C.F.R. §825.106. According to the FMLA regulations, two or more employers may be joint employers where each exercises "some control" over the working condi......
  • 64 J. Kan. Bar Assn. May, 22 (1995). FAMILY AND MEDICAL LEAVE ACT OF 1993.
    • United States
    • Kansas Bar Journal Nbr. 1995, January 1995
    • January 1, 1995
    ...1996 due to meeting the coverage criteria in the preceding year. Id. [FN17]. See 60 Fed. Reg. 2180-01, 2240 (1995) (to be codified at 29 C.F.R. § 825.106). [FN18]. See 60 Fed. Reg. 2180-01, 2240 (1995) (to be codified at 29 C.F.R. § 825.106(a)). Examples of joint employment relationships gi......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT