14 CFR 21.29 - Issue of type certificate: import products

Cite as14 CFR 21.29
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
2162 practice notes
  • Holbrook v. United States, No. 10–2355.
    • United States
    • United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (4th Circuit)
    • March 12, 2012
    ...an abbreviated type certification process for aircraft, such as the subject helicopter, manufactured in certain foreign countries. See 14 C.F.R. § 21.29. Under § 21.29, if the FAA has a bilateral agreement with the country of origin, the FAA may rely on the foreign country's certification t......
  • Knudsen v. United States, No. 77 Civ. 3801 (WCC).
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. 2nd Circuit. United States District Courts. 2nd Circuit. Southern District of New York
    • October 2, 1980
    ...signed by a representative of the Board of Trade of the United Kingdom, and a type certificate that had been issued in accordance with 14 C.F.R. § 21.29. A. Documentation Certification 1. Airworthiness Certificate Affidavits submitted by defendant explain that, under standards applicable to......
  • Austrian Airlines Oesterreichische v. Ut Finance, No. 04 Civ. 3854 (LAK).
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. 2nd Circuit. United States District Courts. 2nd Circuit. Southern District of New York
    • July 18, 2008
    ...Id. § (IXiii). 19. PX 26. 20. PX 25, at AUA19269. 21. See Tr. (Whelan) at 128:19-24; Tr. (Aupperlee) at 157:12-21. 22. DX BE, at 3. 23. 14 C.F.R. § 21.29. Bilateral agreements "are cooperative agreements between the U.S. and the government of a foreign country for their mutual benefit.... [......
  • Airworthiness standards: Special conditions— Agusta S.p.A. Model AB139 helicopters,
    • United States
    • Federal Register March 05, 2004
    • March 5, 2004
    ...14 CFR 21.17, Agusta S.p.A. must show that the Model AB139 helicopter meets the applicable provisions of the regulations as listed below: 14 CFR 21.29; 14 CFR part 29, Amendment 29-1 through Amendment 29- 42, with the following 14 CFR 29.602 at Amendment 29-45; and 14 CFR 29.25 and 29.865 a......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
6 cases
  • Holbrook v. United States, No. 10–2355.
    • United States
    • United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (4th Circuit)
    • March 12, 2012
    ...an abbreviated type certification process for aircraft, such as the subject helicopter, manufactured in certain foreign countries. See 14 C.F.R. § 21.29. Under § 21.29, if the FAA has a bilateral agreement with the country of origin, the FAA may rely on the foreign country's certification t......
  • Knudsen v. United States, No. 77 Civ. 3801 (WCC).
    • United States
    • United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (5th Circuit)
    • October 2, 1980
    ...signed by a representative of the Board of Trade of the United Kingdom, and a type certificate that had been issued in accordance with 14 C.F.R. § 21.29. A. Documentation Certification 1. Airworthiness Certificate Affidavits submitted by defendant explain that, under standards applicable to......
  • Austrian Airlines Oesterreichische v. Ut Finance, No. 04 Civ. 3854 (LAK).
    • United States
    • United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (5th Circuit)
    • July 18, 2008
    ...Id. § (IXiii). 19. PX 26. 20. PX 25, at AUA19269. 21. See Tr. (Whelan) at 128:19-24; Tr. (Aupperlee) at 157:12-21. 22. DX BE, at 3. 23. 14 C.F.R. § 21.29. Bilateral agreements "are cooperative agreements between the U.S. and the government of a foreign country for their mutual benefit.... [......
  • Ovesen v. Mitsubishi Heavy Indus. of America, Inc., 04 Civ. 2849 (JGK)
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. 2nd Circuit. United States District Courts. 2nd Circuit. Southern District of New York
    • May 5, 2012
    ...Type Certificate, Type Certificate A2PC, issued by the United States Federal Aviation Administration (the "FAA") under what is now 14 C.F.R. § 21.29. Id. Mitsubishi ultimately moved for summary judgment, arguing that the eighteen-year statute of repose in GARA barred Ovesen's claims. Ovesen......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT