29 C.F.R. § 102.63 - Investigation of petition by regional director; notice of hearing; service of notice; Notice of Petition for Election; Statement of Position; withdrawal of notice of hearing

Cite as29 C.F.R. § 102.63
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
19 practice notes
  • Representation-Case Procedures
    • United States
    • Federal Register February 06, 2014
    • February 6, 2014
    ...petitions filed annually resulted in significant delays. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \9\ 29 CFR 102.63 and 102.64 \10\ 29 CFR 102.67 and 102.68 (1959). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Accordingly, in......
  • Representation-Case Procedures
    • United States
    • Federal Register December 15, 2014
    • December 15, 2014
    ...be used in connection with such hearing and posthearing proceedings are the same, insofar as they are applicable, as those described in 29 CFR 102.63, 102.64, 102.65, 102.66, 102.67, 102.68, and 102.69, and the statement of the general (d) Should the parties so desire, they may, with the ap......
  • NLRB v. Air Control Products of St. Petersburg, Inc., No. 21017.
    • United States
    • United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (5th Circuit)
    • July 28, 1964
    ...hearing is directed toward determining whether an election should be directed and the appropriate unit in which to hold the election. 29 C.F.R. §§ 102.63, 102.67. In recognition of their unique character, Congress has removed representation hearings from the requirements of § 5 of the Admin......
  • Chamber of Commerce of U.S. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd., Civil Action No. 15–0009 (ABJ)
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. United States District Court (Columbia)
    • July 29, 2015
    ...posted, and shall also distribute it electronically if the employer customarily communicates with its employees electronically." 29 C.F.R. § 102.63(a)(2).• The requirement that the employer file a written "Statement of Position" before the pre-election hearing is scheduled to begin, detaili......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
16 cases
  • NLRB v. Air Control Products of St. Petersburg, Inc., No. 21017.
    • United States
    • United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (5th Circuit)
    • July 28, 1964
    ...hearing is directed toward determining whether an election should be directed and the appropriate unit in which to hold the election. 29 C.F.R. §§ 102.63, 102.67. In recognition of their unique character, Congress has removed representation hearings from the requirements of § 5 of the Admin......
  • Chamber of Commerce of U.S. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd., Civil Action No. 15–0009 (ABJ)
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. United States District Court (Columbia)
    • July 29, 2015
    ...posted, and shall also distribute it electronically if the employer customarily communicates with its employees electronically." 29 C.F.R. § 102.63(a)(2).• The requirement that the employer file a written "Statement of Position" before the pre-election hearing is scheduled to begin, detaili......
  • Chamber of Commerce of U.S. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd., Civil Action No. 11–2262 (JEB).
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. United States District Court (Columbia)
    • July 27, 2012
    ...to Amend July 27, 2012. Held Invalid29 C.F.R. §§ 101.17, 101.18, 101.19, 101.20, 101.21, 101.23, 101.25, 101.28, 101.29, 101.30, 102.62, 102.63, 102.64, 102.65, 102.66, 102.67, 102.69, 102.77, 102.85, 102.86. [879 F.Supp.2d 20]Jonathan C. Fritts, David M. Kerr, Howard Marc Radzely, Michael ......
  • Central Transport, Inc. v. N.L.R.B., Nos. 92-3072
    • United States
    • United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (7th Circuit)
    • July 8, 1993
    ...that the certification shall contain the employer's name, and that the employer shall be notified. Id. (citing 29 C.F.R. §§ 102.61(e), 102.63). Mobil knew of the Board's certification proceedings, and that it was not asked to participate. The court found that even though Mobil may have been......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT