49 CFR 225.33 - Internal Control Plans

Cite as49 CFR 225.33
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
16 practice notes
  • Procedures for the Handling of Retaliation Complaints Under the National Transit Systems Security Act and the Federal Railroad Safety Act
    • United States
    • Federal Register November 09, 2015
    • 9 Noviembre 2015
    ...OSHA to interpret section 20109(g) of FRSA, the no-preemption provision, to mean that FRSA has no bearing on FRA's jurisdiction under 49 CFR part 225 to investigate, make findings, and levy and enforce penalties against railroad carriers for prohibited conduct. Also referencing the FRA regu......
  • Railroad consolidations, mergers, and acquisitions of control: Safety integration plans,
    • United States
    • Federal Register December 31, 1998
    • 31 Diciembre 1998
    ...instructions that will govern these activities. A railroad must also identify the reporting procedures for any reportable accident under 49 CFR part 225, and its policy on harassment and intimidation, including a copy of its internal control plan as required by 49 CFR 225.33. The applicant ......
  • Lacy v. CSX Transp., Inc., No. 25341.
    • United States
    • Supreme Court of West Virginia
    • 28 Junio 1999
    ...[and] to full compliance with the letter and spirit of [the Federal Railroad Administration's] accident reporting regulations." 49 C.F.R. § 225.33(a)(1) (1998). The legal duty imposed upon CSX effectively creates a duty for its employees to reliably report accidents. Indeed, individual......
  • Murphy v. Town of Darien, SC 19983
    • United States
    • Supreme Court of Connecticut
    • 9 Julio 2019
    ...incident, injury or illness will not be permitted or tolerated" [emphasis omitted; internal quotation marks omitted] ), citing 49 C.F.R. § 225.33 (a) (1) (2008). As these cases demonstrate, courts have found preemption under the railroad act only when there is a federal regulation that......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
13 cases
  • Lacy v. CSX Transp., Inc., No. 25341.
    • United States
    • Supreme Court of West Virginia
    • 28 Junio 1999
    ...[and] to full compliance with the letter and spirit of [the Federal Railroad Administration's] accident reporting regulations." 49 C.F.R. § 225.33(a)(1) (1998). The legal duty imposed upon CSX effectively creates a duty for its employees to reliably report accidents. Indeed, individual rail......
  • Murphy v. Town of Darien, SC 19983
    • United States
    • Supreme Court of Connecticut
    • 9 Julio 2019
    ...incident, injury or illness will not be permitted or tolerated" [emphasis omitted; internal quotation marks omitted] ), citing 49 C.F.R. § 225.33 (a) (1) (2008). As these cases demonstrate, courts have found preemption under the railroad act only when there is a federal regulation that thor......
  • Ratledge v. Norfolk S. Ry. Co., No. 1:12–CV–402.
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. 6th Circuit. Eastern District of Tennessee
    • 25 Julio 2013
    ...informed Plaintiff NSR violated federal regulations when it “harassed and intimidated” him between January 7 and January 13, 2010. See49 C.F.R. § 225.33. 2 The FRA also concluded NRS violated regulations when it did not allow Plaintiff to file an initial injury report, see id., and when it ......
  • Grand Trunk W. R.R. Co. v. U.S. Dep't of Labor, No. 17-3083
    • United States
    • United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (6th Circuit)
    • 20 Noviembre 2017
    ...and harassment calculated to prevent or discourage any employee from receiving proper medical treatment for a workplace injury. 49 C.F.R. § 225.33. These regulations were implemented because of concerns that railroad companies were manipulating the reportability of on-the-job incidents. In ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
1 firm's commentaries
  • FRA Bars Supervisors From Medical Exam Rooms
    • United States
    • LexBlog United States
    • 3 Junio 2009
    ...want to go into the examining room, bar the door! And if a supervisor barges in anyway, file a complaint with the FRA for a violation of 49 CFR 225.33(a) and then file a complaint with OSHA’s Whistleblower Office for violation of the FRSA, 49 UCS 20109(a)(4) and (c). Under these new railroa......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT