38 CFR 3.155 - Informal claims

Cite as38 CFR 3.155
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
180 practice notes
172 cases
  • Gambill v. Shinseki, No. 2008-7120.
    • United States
    • United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
    • August 13, 2009
    ...38 C.F.R. § 3.103(a), (c). And the regional office is required to construe all applications liberally in favor of the veteran. See 38 C.F.R. § 3.155(a); see also Moody v. Principi, 360 F.3d 1306, 1310 (Fed.Cir.2004). Finally, unlike in many other settings, the claimant is not required to pr......
  • Arellano v. McDonough, 2020-1073
    • United States
    • United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
    • June 17, 2021
    ...relative, or ... agent authorized to act on behalf of the individual under a durable power of attorney," id. § 5101(a)(2).In addition, 38 C.F.R. § 3.155 provides that "some person acting as next friend of claimant who is not of full age or capacity may indicate a claimant's desire to file a......
  • Burkins v. US, Civ. A. No. 93-K-2125.
    • United States
    • United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (7th Circuit)
    • October 4, 1994
    ...the actual seeking of benefits from the VA after Plaintiff's discharge records are corrected is an administrative matter, under 38 C.F.R. § 3.155(a) and 38 C.F.R. § 3.157(a), that will proceed through the Board of Veterans Appeals, not this Pl.'s Mem. at 15. An examination of other cases sh......
  • Military-Veterans Advocacy v. Sec'y of Veterans Affairs, 2019-1685
    • United States
    • United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
    • July 30, 2021
    ...C.F.R. § 3.2500(b) bars the filing of a supplemental claim when adjudication of the same claim is pending before a federal court; and 38 C.F.R. § 3.155 excludes supplemental claims from the intent-to-file framework. We hold that all three regulations are invalid for contravening the unambig......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
1 books & journal articles

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT