29 CFR 4.188 - Ineligibility for further contracts when violations occur

Cite as29 CFR 4.188
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
18 practice notes
  • Increasing the Minimum Wage for Federal Contractors
    • United States
    • The Secretary Of Labor Office
    • Invalid date
    ...for a contractor's failure to fulfill its labor standard obligations under the DBA and the SCA. 41 U.S.C. 6706(b); 40 U.S.C. 3144(b); 29 CFR 4.188(a); 29 CFR 5.5(a)(7); 29 CFR 5.12(a)(2). The possibility that a contractor will be unable to obtain Government contracts for a fixed period of t......
  • Establishing Paid Sick Leave for Federal Contractors
    • United States
    • Federal Register February 25, 2016
    • February 25, 2016
    ...a contractor's failure to fulfill its labor standards obligations under the SCA and the DBA, see 41 U.S.C. 6706(b); 40 U.S.C. 3144(b); 29 CFR 4.188(a); 29 CFR 5.5(a)(7); 29 CFR 5.12(a)(2), and one that, as noted, was adopted in the Minimum Wage Executive Order rulemaking, see 79 FR 60728 (c......
  • Establishing Paid Sick Leave for Federal Contractors
    • United States
    • Federal Register September 30, 2016
    • September 30, 2016
    ...a contractor's failure to fulfill its labor standards obligations under the SCA and the DBA, see 41 U.S.C. 6706(b); 40 U.S.C. 3144(b); 29 CFR 4.188(a); 29 CFR 5.5(a)(7); 29 CFR 5.12(a)(2), and one that, as noted, was adopted in the Minimum Wage Executive Order rulemaking, see 79 FR 60728 (c......
  • Establishing a Minimum Wage for Contractors
    • United States
    • Federal Register June 17, 2014
    • June 17, 2014
    ...its labor standard obligations under the SCA and the DBA. 40 U.S.C. 3144(b); 41 U.S.C. 6706(b); 29 CFR 5.5(a)(7); 29 CFR 5.12(a)(2); 29 CFR 4.188(a). The possibility that a contractor will be unable to obtain government contracts for a fixed period of time due to debarment promotes contract......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
13 cases
  • Dantran, Inc. v. U.S. Dept. of Labor, No. 98-1830
    • United States
    • United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (1st Circuit)
    • January 7, 1999
    ...that the existence of "unusual circumstances" may forestall the imposition of a debarment sanction. See 41 U.S.C. § 354(a); 29 C.F.R. § 4.188(a). Although the Act does not elaborate, the Secretary has established that the existence of "unusual circumstances" in a given c......
  • Kirkpatrick v. White, No. CIV.A.01-JEO-2942-NE.
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. 11th Circuit. United States District Court of Northern District of Alabama
    • August 12, 2004
    ...the imposition of [the] debarment sanction" because of "unusual circumstances" under 41 U.S.C. § 354(a) and 29 C.F.R. § 4.188(a). Dantran, 171 F.3d at 68. The court went on to say that "the existence of `unusual circumstances' in a given case depends upon the absence of ......
  • Tri-County Contractors, Inc. v. Perez, Civil Action No. 13-1406 (RDM)
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — District of Columbia
    • February 23, 2016
    ...the Secretary has set forth a three-part test in the Act's implementing regulations to assess whether such circumstances exist. See 29 C.F.R. § 4.188(b)(3). The first prong of this test forecloses relief from debarment if certain aggravating factors exist: for example, if the violation of t......
  • Summitt Investigative Service, Inc. v. Herman, No. Civ.A. 97-01008 (CKK).
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. United States District Court (Columbia)
    • September 30, 1998
    ...however, has promulgated regulations that set forth a three-part test to assess factors that may constitute unusual circumstances. See 29 C.F.R. § 4.188(b). While the determination is to be made on a case-by-case basis, see id. § 4.188(b)(1), the burden rests with the violator to demonstrat......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
1 firm's commentaries
  • Decisions of the DOL Administrative Review Board – March 2015
    • United States
    • LexBlog United States
    • April 30, 2015
    ...where that witness also testified that the violations were technical in nature. The ARB found that this argument ignored the fact that 29 C.F.R. § 4.188(b)(1) places the burden on the contractor of showing no evidence of prior violations. The ARB, however, vacated the ALJ’s determination th......
5 provisions
  • Establishing Paid Sick Leave for Federal Contractors
    • United States
    • Federal Register February 25, 2016
    • February 25, 2016
    ...a contractor's failure to fulfill its labor standards obligations under the SCA and the DBA, see 41 U.S.C. 6706(b); 40 U.S.C. 3144(b); 29 CFR 4.188(a); 29 CFR 5.5(a)(7); 29 CFR 5.12(a)(2), and one that, as noted, was adopted in the Minimum Wage Executive Order rulemaking, see 79 FR 60728 (c......
  • Increasing the Minimum Wage for Federal Contractors
    • United States
    • The Secretary Of Labor Office
    • Invalid date
    ...for a contractor's failure to fulfill its labor standard obligations under the DBA and the SCA. 41 U.S.C. 6706(b); 40 U.S.C. 3144(b); 29 CFR 4.188(a); 29 CFR 5.5(a)(7); 29 CFR 5.12(a)(2). The possibility that a contractor will be unable to obtain Government contracts for a fixed period of t......
  • Establishing Paid Sick Leave for Federal Contractors
    • United States
    • Federal Register September 30, 2016
    • September 30, 2016
    ...a contractor's failure to fulfill its labor standards obligations under the SCA and the DBA, see 41 U.S.C. 6706(b); 40 U.S.C. 3144(b); 29 CFR 4.188(a); 29 CFR 5.5(a)(7); 29 CFR 5.12(a)(2), and one that, as noted, was adopted in the Minimum Wage Executive Order rulemaking, see 79 FR 60728 (c......
  • Establishing a Minimum Wage for Contractors
    • United States
    • Federal Register June 17, 2014
    • June 17, 2014
    ...its labor standard obligations under the SCA and the DBA. 40 U.S.C. 3144(b); 41 U.S.C. 6706(b); 29 CFR 5.5(a)(7); 29 CFR 5.12(a)(2); 29 CFR 4.188(a). The possibility that a contractor will be unable to obtain government contracts for a fixed period of time due to debarment promotes contract......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT