11 CFR 100.16 - Independent expenditure (52 U.S.C. 30101(17))

Cite as11 CFR 100.16
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
31 practice notes
  • Separate Parts In This Issue Part II Federal Election Commission,
    • United States
    • Federal Register January 03, 2003
    • January 3, 2003
    ...and their agents and reworked other aspects of the former definition. Corresponding revisions are being made to the regulations in 11 CFR 100.16. Congress repealed the Commission's pre-BCRA regulations regarding ``coordinated general public political communications'' at former 11 CFR 100.23......
  • Independent Expenditures and Electioneering Communications by Corporations and Labor Organizations
    • United States
    • Federal Register October 21, 2014
    • October 21, 2014
    ...political committee, or their agents, or a political party committee and its agents. 52 U.S.C. 30101(17) (formerly 2 U.S.C. 431(17)); 11 CFR 100.16(a). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \1\ 52 U.S.C. 30101-30146 (formerly 2 U.S.C. The Bipartisan Cam......
  • Separate Parts In This Issue Part II Federal Election Commission,
    • United States
    • Federal Register January 03, 2003
    • January 3, 2003
    ...determine whether the communication satisfies the ``express advocacy'' requirement of the definition of an independent expenditure (see 11 CFR 100.16) and therefore must determine whether the disbursement for that communication constitutes an independent expenditure. A person reaching or ex......
  • Federal Election Commission,
    • United States
    • Federal Register September 24, 2002
    • September 24, 2002
    ...and their agents and reworked other aspects of the former language. Corresponding revisions would be made to the regulations in 11 CFR 100.16. Congress repealed the Commission's pre-BCRA regulations regarding “coordinated general public political communications” (at pre-BCRA 11 CFR 100.23) ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
8 cases
  • Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington v. Federal Election Commission, Civil Action No.: 18-76 (RC)
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. United States District Court (Columbia)
    • March 29, 2019
    ...identified candidate" and that is made without coordinating with the candidate or a political party. See 52 U.S.C. § 30101(17) ; 11 C.F.R. § 100.16. An "electioneering communication" is a communication which "refers to a clearly identified candidate for Federal office," is "targeted to the ......
  • McConnell v. Federal Election Commission, No. 02-582 CKK,KLH,RJL
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. United States District Court (Columbia)
    • May 1, 2003
    ...of express advocacy). 11 C.F.R. § 114.10(d)(1) ("A qualified nonprofit corporation may make independent expenditures, as defined in 11 C.F.R. § 100.16, without violating the prohibitions against corporate expenditures contained in 11 C.F.R. part 114."). In defining what kind of corporation ......
  • Republican Party of New Mexico v. King, No. 12–2015.
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Tenth Circuit
    • December 18, 2013
    ...their agents, or a political party committee or its agents to become materially involved in decisions regarding the communication.... 11 C.F.R. § 100.16 (2013). 10.Stop This Insanity conflicts with Carey, another case from the same district court. Carey endorses the concept a single entity ......
  • Citizens v. Fed. Election Comm'n, Civil Action No.: 18-76 (RC)
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. United States District Court (Columbia)
    • March 29, 2019
    ...clearly identified candidate" and that is made without coordinating with the candidate or a political party. See 52 U.S.C. § 30101(17); 11 C.F.R. § 100.16. An "electioneering communication" is a communication which "refers to a clearly identified candidate for Federal office," is "targeted ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
2 firm's commentaries

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT