8 C.F.R. §235.3 - Inadmissible aliens and expedited removal

Cite as8 C.F.R. §235.3
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
243 cases
  • Petgrave v. Aleman, CIVIL ACTION NO. 5:20-CV-34
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. 5th Circuit. United States District Courts. 5th Circuit. Southern District of Texas
    • March 29, 2021
    ...claims—in the form of a credible fear interview with an asylum officer—before they can be removed. 8 U.S.C. § 1225(b)(1)(A)(ii) ; 8 C.F.R. § 235.3(b)(4).C. Credible Fear InterviewBecause Petitioner expressed a fear of persecution, the immigration officer referred him for an interview with a......
  • Al Otro Lado, Inc. v. McAleenan, Case No. 17-cv-02366-BAS-KSC
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. 9th Circuit. United States District Court (Southern District of California)
    • July 29, 2019
    ...(emphasis added). An implementing regulation governing this expedited removal procedure imposes an analogous obligation. 8 C.F.R. § 235.3(b)(4). In these circumstances, the immigration officer must refer the alien to an "asylum officer," who is statutorily required to be "an immigration off......
  • Al Otro Lado, Inc. v. McAleenan, Case No. 17-cv-02366-BAS-KSC
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. 9th Circuit. United States District Court (Southern District of California)
    • August 2, 2019
    ...(emphasis added). An implementing regulation governing this expedited removal procedure imposes an analogous obligation. 8 C.F.R. § 235.3(b)(4). In these circumstances, the immigration officer must refer the alien to an "asylum officer," who is statutorily required to be "an immigration off......
  • Rafeedie v. INS, Civ. A. No. 88-0366.
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. United States District Court (Columbia)
    • June 15, 1988
    ...rather than an exclusion hearing. Id. at n. 7. 46 The INS's decision to "parole" Rafeedie to his home in Ohio and defer inspection, 8 C.F.R. § 235.3(c), 8 U.S.C. § 1182(d)(5)(A), does not alter his status for purposes of this constitutional analysis. Plaintiff must still be treated as if he......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT