18 CFR 4.34 - Hearings on applications; consultation on terms and conditions; motions to intervene; alternative procedures

Cite as18 CFR 4.34
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
1105 practice notes
  • Electric utilities (Federal Power Act): Hydroelectric licensing regulations,
    • United States
    • Federal Register November 17, 2005
    • November 17, 2005
    ...or agency. Preliminary condition or prescription means a preliminary condition or prescription filed by a Department with FERC under 18 CFR 4.34(b), 4.34(i), or 5.22(a) for potential inclusion in a hydropower Prescription means a fishway prescribed under FPA sec. 18, 16 U.S.C. 811, to provi......
  • Electric utilities (Federal Power Act): Hydroelectric licensing regulations,
    • United States
    • Federal Register August 25, 2003
    • August 25, 2003
    ...the consensus-based ALP,\8\ or both.\9\ These concerns are addressed in the following pages.\10\ \7\ SCE, NEU, Xcel, Georgia DNR \8\ See 18 CFR 4.34(i). \9\ SCE's detailed recommendations for improvements to the traditional process are discussed in Section \10\ Some commenters, such as WPSR......
  • Part II
    • United States
    • Federal Register November 17, 2005
    • November 17, 2005
    ...or agency. Preliminary condition or prescription means a preliminary condition or prescription filed by a Department with FERC under 18 CFR 4.34(b), 4.34(i), or 5.22(a) for potential inclusion in a hydropower Prescription means a fishway prescribed under FPA sec. 18, 16 U.S.C. 811, to provi......
  • Separate Parts In This Issue Part II Energy Department, Federal Energy Regulatory Commission,
    • United States
    • Federal Register August 25, 2003
    • August 25, 2003
    ...the consensus-based ALP,\8\ or both.\9\ These concerns are addressed in the following pages.\10\ \7\ SCE, NEU, Xcel, Georgia DNR \8\ See 18 CFR 4.34(i). \9\ SCE's detailed recommendations for improvements to the traditional process are discussed in Section \10\ Some commenters, such as WPSR......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
18 cases
  • Merced Irrigation Dist. v. Cnty. of Mariposa, CASE NO. 1:12-cv-01645-LJO-SKO
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. 9th Circuit. United States District Courts. 9th Circuit. Eastern District of California
    • March 4, 2013
    ...FERC Application, Mariposa contends it has the right to submit comments, object to the Project, and petition FERC for a hearing under 18 C.F.R. § 4.34(a), the review of which would be subject to federal jurisdiction. (Doc. 21, 21:3-10.) Mariposa may object to any determination by FERC and/o......
  • Cnty. of Butte v. Dep't of Water Res., S258574
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Court (California)
    • August 1, 2022
    ...FERC has sole jurisdiction over disputes concerning the licensing process employed here ( County of Butte , supra , C071785; see 18 C.F.R. § 4.34(i)(6)(vii) ), and the requested injunction would be akin to the "veto power" prohibited by First Iowa Coop. v. Federal Power Comm'n (1946) 328 U.......
  • Cnty. of Butte v. Dep't of Water Res., S258574
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Court (California)
    • August 1, 2022
    ...FERC has sole jurisdiction over disputes concerning the licensing process employed here ( County of Butte , supra , C071785; see 18 C.F.R. § 4.34(i)(6)(vii) ), and the requested injunction would be akin to the "veto power" prohibited by First Iowa Coop. v. Federal Power Comm'n (1946) 328 U.......
  • Merced Irrigation Dist. v. Cnty. of Mariposa, Case No. 1:12–cv–01645–LJO–SKO.
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. 9th Circuit. United States District Courts. 9th Circuit. Eastern District of California
    • April 23, 2013
    ...FERC Application, Mariposa contends it has the right to submit comments, object to the Project, and petition FERC for a hearing under 18 C.F.R. § 4.34(a), the review of which would be subject to federal jurisdiction. (Doc. 21, 21:3–10.) Mariposa may object to any determination by FERC and/o......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
3 firm's commentaries
1 books & journal articles
  • Adaptive Management in Hydropower Regulation
    • United States
    • Environmental Law Reporter Nbr. 39-10, October 2009
    • October 1, 2009
    ...Process, http://www.americanwhitewater.org/content/Wiki/stewardship:relicensing_ overview (last visited Feb. 19, 2007); see also 18 C.F.R. §4.34(i). 57. Richard Roos-Collins, Integrated Licensing Process: New Hope for Eicient Regulation of Nonfederal Hydropower Projects , 35 A.B.A. Trends (......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT