29 CFR 1614.109 - Hearings

Cite as29 CFR 1614.109
CurrencyCurrent through December 7, 2020
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
102 practice notes
  • 979 F.Supp. 458 (N.D.Tex. 1997), Civ. A. 396-CV-2873, Boswell v. Department of Treasury, Office of Comptroller of Currency
    • United States
    • Federal Cases United States District Courts 5th Circuit United States District Courts. 5th Circuit. Northern District of Texas
    • May 13, 1997
    ...with the hearing process went significantly beyond those forming the basis for his earlier administrative complaints. Pursuant to 29 C.F.R. § 1614.109(a), "[w]here the administrative judge determines that the complainant is raising or intends to pursue issues like or related to those r......
  • Perry v. Kappos, 062810 VAEDC, 1:10cv167 (JCC)
    • United States
    • Federal Cases United States District Courts 4th Circuit United States District Court (Eastern District of Virginia)
    • June 28, 2010
    ...authorized to "issue a decision... in favor of the opposing party" and "take such other actions as appropriate." 29 C.F.R. § 1614.109(f)(3)(iv)-(v). Defendant argues that Plaintiff did not fully comply with these regulations, and that such failure constitutes exhaustion.......
  • The Department of the Navy's Equal Employment Opportunity Complaint Dispute Resolution Process Pilot Program: A Bold Experiment that Deserves Further Exploration
    • United States
    • Military Law Review Nbr. 169, September 2001
    • September 1, 2001
    ...77. 29 C.F.R. § 1614.106. 78. Id. § 1614.107(b). 79. Id. 80. Id. 81. Id. § 1614.109(b). 82. Formerly found in 29 C.F.R. § 1614.109. 83. Id. § 1614.109(i). 84. Id. § 1614.403(f). 85. Id. § 1614.404(c). 86. See supra note 61 and accompanying text (discussing the EEOC's rationale for reducing ......
  • 444 F.Supp.2d 61 (D.D.C. 2006), C. A. 04-2209, Hollingsworth v. Duff
    • United States
    • Federal Cases United States District Courts United States District Court (Columbia)
    • August 2, 2006
    ...explicitly adopted the oral ruling of an Administrative Judge, Def.'s Exh. A at 1, rather than that of a hearing officer. Compare 29 C.F.R. § 1614.109 (noting that EEOC hearings are conducted by an "administrative judge") with FEPS § F.8 (stating that FEPS complaints are reviewed ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
93 cases
  • 979 F.Supp. 458 (N.D.Tex. 1997), Civ. A. 396-CV-2873, Boswell v. Department of Treasury, Office of Comptroller of Currency
    • United States
    • Federal Cases United States District Courts 5th Circuit United States District Courts. 5th Circuit. Northern District of Texas
    • May 13, 1997
    ...with the hearing process went significantly beyond those forming the basis for his earlier administrative complaints. Pursuant to 29 C.F.R. § 1614.109(a), "[w]here the administrative judge determines that the complainant is raising or intends to pursue issues like or related to those r......
  • Perry v. Kappos, 062810 VAEDC, 1:10cv167 (JCC)
    • United States
    • Federal Cases United States District Courts 4th Circuit United States District Court (Eastern District of Virginia)
    • June 28, 2010
    ...authorized to "issue a decision... in favor of the opposing party" and "take such other actions as appropriate." 29 C.F.R. § 1614.109(f)(3)(iv)-(v). Defendant argues that Plaintiff did not fully comply with these regulations, and that such failure constitutes exhaustion.......
  • 444 F.Supp.2d 61 (D.D.C. 2006), C. A. 04-2209, Hollingsworth v. Duff
    • United States
    • Federal Cases United States District Courts United States District Court (Columbia)
    • August 2, 2006
    ...explicitly adopted the oral ruling of an Administrative Judge, Def.'s Exh. A at 1, rather than that of a hearing officer. Compare 29 C.F.R. § 1614.109 (noting that EEOC hearings are conducted by an "administrative judge") with FEPS § F.8 (stating that FEPS complaints are reviewed ......
  • Carter v. Brennan, 121019 GAMDC, C. A. 5:19-CV-207 (MTT)
    • United States
    • Federal Cases United States District Courts 11th Circuit Middle District of Georgia
    • December 10, 2019
    ...Brown, 440 F.3d at 1262 (citing 20 C.F.R. § 1614.106(a)). When the employee requests a hearing, the EEOC appoints an ALJ. 29 C.F.R. § 1614.109(a). After the ALJ renders a decision, the agency issues a final order within 40 days of receipt of the ALJ's decision. 29 C.F.R.......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
1 books & journal articles
8 provisions