8 C.F.R. § 1240.10 - Hearing
| Cite as | 8 C.F.R. § 1240.10 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
214 practice notes
-
Appellate Procedures and Decisional Finality in Immigration Proceedings; Administrative Closure
...practice in such proceedings, as [the alien] shall choose.'' INA 292, 8 U.S.C. 1362; see also INA 240(b)(4)(A), 8 U.S.C. 1229a(b)(4)(A); 8 CFR 1240.10(a)(1). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Regarding the possible impact of the rule on pro se alien......
-
Executive Office for Immigration Review; Fee Review
...which typically includes the appeal form and instructions that will provide information on both the fee and the fee waiver process. 8 CFR 1240.10(a)(3). An alien who is concerned that he or she may wish to appeal the immigration judge's decision should, accordingly, use that time between th......
-
Nonimmigrants; removal orders, countries to which aliens may be removed,
...nature of executive decisions as to foreign policy is political, not judicial''). The proposed rule of the Department of Justice amends 8 CFR 1240.10(f) and 1240.12 to clarify the distinction between the administrative adjudication and the effectuation of the alien's removal, which implicat......
-
Immigration; removal orders; countries to which aliens may be removed,
...to which the alien may be removed where removal is premised upon some previous connection to that country. 69 FR at 42908. Indeed, 8 CFR 1240.10(f), as amended by this rule, requires that immigration judges identify for the record the countries to which an alien may be removed. Accordingly,......
Request a trial to view additional results
213 cases
-
C.J.L.G. v. Sessions, No. 16-73801
...by such counsel ... as [the alien] shall choose." 8 U.S.C. § 1362 ; see also 8 U.S.C. § 1229a(b)(4)(A) (substantially the same); 8 C.F.R. § 1240.10(a)(1)–(2). We have held that a corollary of this privilege is an immigration judge's ("IJ") duty to inform an alien of his right to counsel, an......
-
Leslie v. Attorney Gen. Of The United States, No. 08-3180.
...arguing that the Immigration Judge's (“IJ”) failure to advise him of the availability of free legal services, as required under 8 C.F.R. § 1240.10(a)(2)-(3), entitles him to a new removal hearing under United States ex rel. Accardi v. Shaughnessy, 347 U.S. 260, 74 S.Ct. 499, 98 L.Ed. 681 (1......
-
United States v. Munoz-Giron, Criminal Action No. 4:13cr17.
...§ 1252(b) (1994 & Supp.1997) (enacted Apr. 24 1996). See Doc. 13, Ex. 7. 9. The current version of these regulations can be found at 8 C.F.R. §§ 1240.10, 1240.13 (2013). 10. This point is discussed, infra, starting at page 624. 11. This section of the statute gave the attorney general broad......
-
United States v. Munoz-Giron, Criminal Action No. 4:13cr17
...1252(b) (1994 & Supp. ¶ 1997) (enacted Apr. 24 1996). See Doc. 13, Ex. 7. 9. The current version of these regulations can be found at 8 C.F.R. §§ 1240.10, 1240.13 (2013). 10. This point is discussed, infra, starting at page 14. 11. This section of the statute gave the attorney general broad......
Request a trial to view additional results
1 books & journal articles
-
An immigration Gideon for lawful permanent residents.
...Amendment, 58 UCLA L. REV. 1461, 1499 (2011). (35.) 8 U.S.C. § 1362 (2012) (codifying INA § 292). (36.) Id. (emphasis added). (37.) 8 C.F.R. § 1240.10(a)(1) (38.) Id. § 1240.10(a)(2). (39.) See, e.g., Trench v. INS, 783 F.2d 181, 183 (10th Cir. 1986); Barthold v. INS, 517 F.2d 689, 690-91 (......