8 C.F.R. §1240.10 - Hearing
| Cite as | 8 C.F.R. §1240.10 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
224 cases
-
Castellar v. McAleenan, Case No. 17-cv-0491-BAS-BGS
...an alien's right to representation at his or her own expense, and the availability of pro bono legal services." (Id. ¶ 29 (citing 8 C.F.R. § 1240.10(a) ).) The hearing provides an opportunity for the immigration judge to verify service of the NTA, provide the NTA if service was not made, an......
-
United States v. Castillo-Martinez
...the government may lodge "additional or substituted charges of inadmissibility and/or deportability and/or factual allegations." 8 C.F.R. § 1240.10(e). "[T]here is no requirement that the [government] advance every conceivable basis for deportability" in the original NTA. Magasouba v. Mukas......
-
United States v. Munoz-Giron, Criminal Action No. 4:13cr17
...1252(b) (1994 & Supp. ¶ 1997) (enacted Apr. 24 1996). See Doc. 13, Ex. 7. 9. The current version of these regulations can be found at 8 C.F.R. §§ 1240.10, 1240.13 (2013). 10. This point is discussed, infra, starting at page 14. 11. This section of the statute gave the attorney general broad......
-
Alexander-Mendoza v. Attorney Gen. United States
...not notified by the Immigration Judge of the availability of pro bono counsel – as required by regulation. Id. at 174–75, 182 ; see 8 C.F.R. § 1240.10(a)(1)–(3). The alien was ordered removed, and his administrative appeal was denied by the BIA, all without him ever having representation. S......
Request a trial to view additional results
1 books & journal articles
-
An immigration Gideon for lawful permanent residents.
...Amendment, 58 UCLA L. REV. 1461, 1499 (2011). (35.) 8 U.S.C. § 1362 (2012) (codifying INA § 292). (36.) Id. (emphasis added). (37.) 8 C.F.R. § 1240.10(a)(1) (38.) Id. § 1240.10(a)(2). (39.) See, e.g., Trench v. INS, 783 F.2d 181, 183 (10th Cir. 1986); Barthold v. INS, 517 F.2d 689, 690-91 (......