49 C.F.R. §218.103 - Hand-operated switches, including crossover switches
| Cite as | 49 C.F.R. §218.103 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
5 cases
-
Walls v. Union Pac. R.R. Co., 8:20-CV-413
...his claim for negligence per se under FELA. Walls argues that Jones negligently threw the switch early, in violation of FRA regulation 49 C.F.R. § 218.103 and Union Pacific operating rule 8.2, which forced Walls to stop the train and eventually led to his injury. Filing 53 at 13–14, 22. Wal......
-
Harper v. Norfolk S. Ry. Co., Case No. 2:12–CV–00049.
...This matter is now before the Court for consideration of Plaintiffs motion for partial summary judgment as to his claim under 49 C.F.R. § 218.103. Doc. 69. For the reasons below, the Court GRANTS Plaintiff's motion.I. BACKGROUND Plaintiff has worked for Defendant, a railway company, since J......
-
CSX Transp., Inc. v. Total Grain Mktg., LLC, CASE NO. 11-CV-171-WDS
...operated switches and requires railroads to adopt and comply with an operating rule which complies with the section's requirements. 49 C.F.R. § 218.103(a)(1). CSX contends that § 218.103(b)(3), (b)(4), and (b)(5) "cover" TGM's negligent switch inspection claim, and that claim is therefore, ......
-
Walls v. Union Pac. R.R. Co., 8:20-CV-413
...In his negligence per se claim, Walls claims that an employee of Union Pacific violated Federal Railroad Administration regulation 49 C.F.R. § 218.103 and Union Pacific operating rule 8.2 when the employee threw a railroad switch early. Walls alleges that when the switch was thrown early, t......
Request a trial to view additional results