29 CFR 780.1 - General scope of the Act

Cite as29 CFR 780.1
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
2 practice notes
  • Rodriguez v. Whiting Farms, Inc., No. 02-1483.
    • United States
    • United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (10th Circuit)
    • February 10, 2004
    ...employees "in those workweeks when they are engaged in interstate or foreign commerce or in the production of goods for such commerce." 29 C.F.R. § 780.1. Page 1185 of the Act's requirements is the payment to employees of "one and one-half times the regular rate" for hours worked in excess ......
  • Martinez v. Deaf Smith County Grain Processors, Inc., Civ. A. No. CA-2-81-228.
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. 5th Circuit. United States District Courts. 5th Circuit. Northern District of Texas
    • March 1, 1984
    ...employees are required to comply with the Act's provisions in this regard unless relieved therefrom by some exemption in the Act...." 29 CFR § 780.1 (1981). An employer who claims an exemption under the Act has the burden of showing that it applies. Mitchell v. Kentucky Finance Co., 359 U.S......
2 cases
  • Rodriguez v. Whiting Farms, Inc., No. 02-1483.
    • United States
    • United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (10th Circuit)
    • February 10, 2004
    ...employees "in those workweeks when they are engaged in interstate or foreign commerce or in the production of goods for such commerce." 29 C.F.R. § 780.1. Page 1185 of the Act's requirements is the payment to employees of "one and one-half times the regular rate" for hours worked in excess ......
  • Martinez v. Deaf Smith County Grain Processors, Inc., Civ. A. No. CA-2-81-228.
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. 5th Circuit. United States District Courts. 5th Circuit. Northern District of Texas
    • March 1, 1984
    ...employees are required to comply with the Act's provisions in this regard unless relieved therefrom by some exemption in the Act...." 29 CFR § 780.1 (1981). An employer who claims an exemption under the Act has the burden of showing that it applies. Mitchell v. Kentucky Finance Co., 359 U.S......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT