45 CFR 160.203 - General rule and exceptions

Cite as45 CFR 160.203
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
156 practice notes
  • Dinerstein v. Google, LLC, No. 19 C 4311
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. 7th Circuit. United States District Court (Northern District of Illinois)
    • 4 September 2020
    ...HIPAA's object. Furthermore, HIPAA regulations specifically provide that "more stringent" state rules are not preempted, 45 C.F.R. § 160.203(b), and "more stringent" is defined to include a state law that "provides 484 F.Supp.3d 584 greater privacy protection for th......
  • Brown v. Mortensen, No. S180862.
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Court (California)
    • 16 June 2011
    ...favor additional, more protective state legislation. Although HIPAA generally preempts state laws (42 U.S.C. § 1320d–7(a)(1); see 45 C.F.R. § 160.203 (2010)), Congress carved out a different rule for privacy regulation (42 U.S.C. § 1320d–7(a)(2)(B)), directing that only conflicting or less ......
  • Byrne v. Avery Ctr. for Obstetrics & Gynecology, P.C., No. 18904.
    • United States
    • Supreme Court of Connecticut
    • 11 November 2014
    ...1 of this opinion for the complete text of 42 U.S.C. § 1320d–7. The department's regulations, namely, 45 C.F.R. § 160.202 (2004) and 45 C.F.R. § 160.203, provide additional explication of HIPAA's 314 Conn. 450preemptive effect. Specifically, 45 C.F.R. § 160.203 provides as a “general rule” ......
  • United States v. Zadeh, No. 15–10195.
    • United States
    • United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (5th Circuit)
    • 21 April 2016
    ...any “provision of State law [that] relates to the privacy of individually identifiable health information,” 45 C.F.R. §§ 164.512(f), 160.203(b). Dr. Zadeh argues that since HIPAA's reach is limited by state law, so too is the reach of the Controlled Substances Act. We find neither legal nor......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
129 cases
  • Dinerstein v. Google, LLC, No. 19 C 4311
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. 7th Circuit. United States District Court (Northern District of Illinois)
    • 4 September 2020
    ...frustrates HIPAA's object. Furthermore, HIPAA regulations specifically provide that "more stringent" state rules are not preempted, 45 C.F.R. § 160.203(b), and "more stringent" is defined to include a state law that "provides 484 F.Supp.3d 584 greater privacy protection for the individual w......
  • Brown v. Mortensen, No. S180862.
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Court (California)
    • 16 June 2011
    ...favor additional, more protective state legislation. Although HIPAA generally preempts state laws (42 U.S.C. § 1320d–7(a)(1); see 45 C.F.R. § 160.203 (2010)), Congress carved out a different rule for privacy regulation (42 U.S.C. § 1320d–7(a)(2)(B)), directing that only conflicting or less ......
  • Byrne v. Avery Ctr. for Obstetrics & Gynecology, P.C., No. 18904.
    • United States
    • Supreme Court of Connecticut
    • 11 November 2014
    ...1 of this opinion for the complete text of 42 U.S.C. § 1320d–7. The department's regulations, namely, 45 C.F.R. § 160.202 (2004) and 45 C.F.R. § 160.203, provide additional explication of HIPAA's 314 Conn. 450preemptive effect. Specifically, 45 C.F.R. § 160.203 provides as a “general rule” ......
  • United States v. Zadeh, No. 15–10195.
    • United States
    • United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (5th Circuit)
    • 21 April 2016
    ...any “provision of State law [that] relates to the privacy of individually identifiable health information,” 45 C.F.R. §§ 164.512(f), 160.203(b). Dr. Zadeh argues that since HIPAA's reach is limited by state law, so too is the reach of the Controlled Substances Act. We find neither legal nor......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
13 firm's commentaries
  • Georgia Supreme Court takes another chip off SB 3
    • United States
    • LexBlog United States
    • 15 May 2007
    ...be preempted by the Privacy Rule only if the relevant HIPAA standard is, in the first instance, “contrary to” the state law in question. 45 CFR § 160.203. A HIPAA standard will be deemed “contrary to” a state law if it would be “impossible to comply with both the [s]tate and federal require......
  • OCR Wants YOU! (To Comment on Whether HIPAA Regulations Impede Coordination of Care)
    • United States
    • JD Supra United States
    • 16 January 2019
    ...regarding how their health information is used and to whom it may be disclosed. See id. at 64306. [23] Id. [24] Id. [25] Id. [26] See 45 CFR 160.203(b). [27] 71 P.S. 1690.108(b). There are exceptions for emergencies where the patient’s life is in immediate jeopardy. [28] Id. [29] Id. [30] S......
  • Health Update - November 2014
    • United States
    • JD Supra United States
    • 21 November 2014
    ...C.F.R. § 164.514(e)(3). 29 See 45 C.F.R. § 164.514(e)(2). 30 45 C.F.R. § 164.514(e)(4). 31 42 C.F.R. Part 2, Sections 2.13, 2.32. 32 45 C.F.R. § 160.203. 33 45 C.F.R. § 34 45 C.F.R. § 164.520(b). 35 45 C.F.R. § 164.506(b). 36 The HIPAA Privacy Rule does provide patients with a right to requ......
  • Government Investigations Into Cybersecurity Breaches In Healthcare
    • United States
    • JD Supra United States
    • 15 February 2016
    ...be imposed in addition to one year of imprisonment. 30 Individuals committing offenses under false pretenses may be subject to a 24 45 C.F.R. § 160.203. 25 42 U.S.C. § 1320d-5. 26 42 U.S.C. § 1320d-6(a). 27 Id. 28 United States Department of Justice, Memorandum Opinion for the General Couns......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
6 books & journal articles
  • What Happens in Iowa Stays in Iowa: A Framework for Implementing Changes to State Open Records Laws
    • United States
    • Iowa Law Review Nbr. 98-4, May 2013
    • 1 May 2013
    ...employee’s personal information, such as that employee’s address, gender, and birth date. Id. at 48. 32. IOWA CODE § 8A.106(1). 33. 45 C.F.R. § 160.203 (2012) (providing privacy provisions for medical records that preempt state law). 34. Clymer , 601 N.W.2d at 45. 35. Id. (citing DeLaMater ......
  • HIPAA: Its Impact on Ex Parte Disclosures With an Adverse Party's Treating Physician
    • United States
    • Capital University Law Review Nbr. 34-4, July 2006
    • 1 July 2006
    ...Identifiable Health Information, 65 Fed. Reg. 82462, 82463-64 (Dec. 28, 2000) (codified at 45 C.F.R. pts. 160, 164). [10] See generally 45 C.F.R. §§ 160, 164 [11] See, e.g., id. § 164.512(e). [12] See id. [13] See id. § 160.203. [14] See id. § 160.203(b). [15] See id. [16] See Standards for......
  • 79 J. Kan. Bar Assn 9, 23 (2010). How HITECH Are You? New Privacy and Security Rule Requirements.
    • United States
    • Kansas Bar Journal Nbr. 2010, January 2010
    • 1 January 2010
    ...and "health care provider" are defined in 45 C.F.R. 160.103. 45 C.F.R. § 160.103. Id. 45 C.F.R. § 164.502(a). 45 C.F.R. §§ 160.202, 160.203(b). See, e.g., K.S.A. 59-2979, 59-29b79, 60-427, and 65-5602. 45 C.F.R. §§ 164.502(a), 164.508(a). 45 C.F.R. §§ 164.502, 164.508(b). 45 C.F.R. § 164.50......
  • Therapeutic Privilege and Custody Evaluations: Discovery of Treatment Records
    • United States
    • Family Court Review Nbr. 54-1, January 2016
    • 1 January 2016
    ...with this approach (45 C.F.R. Parts160 and 164) and is preempted by state law that is more protective of treatment confidentiality (45 C.F.R. § 160.203(b)).28. CAL.PENAL CODE §§ 11164–11174.34 (West 2015).29. CAL.CIV.CODE § 43.92 (West 2015); CAL.CIV.CODE§ 56.10(c)(19) (West 2015).30. Pub. L......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT