29 C.F.R. 1910.132 - General requirements

Cite as29 C.F.R. 1910.132
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
224 practice notes
  • Part III
    • United States
    • Federal Register November 15, 2007
    • November 15, 2007
    ...to ensure the use of PPE. Some standards indicate in broad performance terms when PPE is to be used, and what is to be used (See, e.g., 29 CFR 1910.132). Other provisions are very specific, such as 29 CFR 1910.266(d)(1)(iv), which requires that chain saw operators be provided with protectiv......
  • Reports and guidance documents; availability, etc.: Hydrogen economy; applicable statutory and regulatory provisions,
    • United States
    • Federal Register January 05, 2007
    • January 5, 2007
    ...release, then emergency response operations must comply with Sec. 1910.120(q)., ``Emergency response to hazardous substance releases.'' 29 CFR 1910.132(a), Personal protective equipment, requires that protective equipment, including personal protective equipment for eyes, face, head, and ex......
  • Standards Improvement Project:
    • United States
    • Federal Register June 08, 2011
    • June 8, 2011
    ...certifying training compliance in the following sections: (f)(4) of the general industry Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) standard (29 CFR 1910.132), paragraph (e)(4) of the shipyard employment PPE standard (29 CFR 1915.152), and paragraph (n)(4) of the general industry and construction ......
  • Safety and health standards, etc.: Employer payment for personal protective equipment,
    • United States
    • Federal Register March 31, 1999
    • March 31, 1999
    ...Analysis VII. Public Participation VIII. State-plan States IX. OSHA's Supplementary Statement of Reasons For Its Interpretation of 29 CFR 1910.132(a) X. List of Subjects in 29 CFR parts 1910, 1915, 1917, 1918, and 1926 XI. Authority and Signature XII. Proposed Employees often need to wear p......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
108 cases
  • Cavallaro v. Corning Inc., No. 97-CV-6548L.
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. 2nd Circuit. United States District Court of Western District of New York
    • April 28, 2000
    ...all covered companies to conduct plant-wide hazard assessments to determine employees' exposure to head, face, hand and foot injuries. 29 C.F.R. § 1910.132. Later that year, Corning retained an outside consultant, the Julius Kraft Company, to conduct a plant-wide safety audit at the Page 33......
  • Anderson v. Perdue Farms, Inc., Case No. 1:06-cv-01000-MEF-WC.
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. 11th Circuit. Middle District of Alabama
    • March 10, 2009
    ...not mean it is for the benefit of the company. Perdue relies on the stated purposes of some of the pertinent regulations, specifically 29 C.F.R. § 1910.132, and Anderson v. Pilgrim's Pride, Corp., 147 F.Supp.2d at 561.15 According to Perdue, the Court may not presume that, simply because it......
  • Alvarez v. Ibp, Inc., No. 02-35042.
    • United States
    • United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (9th Circuit)
    • August 5, 2003
    ...of protective equipment at the Pasco plant "wherever[][] necessary by reason of hazards or processes of [work] environment." 29 C.F.R. § 1910.132(a) Second, it is beyond cavil that the donning, doffing, washing, and retrieving of protective gear is, at both broad and basic levels, done for ......
  • Oglesby v. RCA Corp., Nos. 83-2682
    • United States
    • United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (7th Circuit)
    • January 2, 1985
    ...and protective clothing as required by regulations promulgated under the Occupational Safety and Health Act (OSHA), 29 U.S.C. Sec. 654; 29 C.F.R. 1910.132. In the third count it was alleged in substance that plaintiff was discharged in retaliation for having asserted "his statutory rights a......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
69 firm's commentaries
  • Employer’s OSHA-Related Obligations Concerning Coronavirus
    • United States
    • JD Supra United States
    • March 30, 2020
    ...7 29 C.F.R. 1904.5(b)(7) (emphasis added). 8 Osha.gov/Publications/OSHA3990.pdf. 9 Id. at 19. 10 Id. at 20. 11 Id. 12Id. at 20-25. 13 29 C.F.R. 1910.132(d)(1). 14 29 C.F.R. 1910.134. 15 29 C.F.R. 1910.1200. 16 § 5-405 of the Md. Code, Labor and Employment Article; COMAR § 17 29......
  • OSHA's New COVID-19 Inspection Plan: What Employers Should Expect
    • United States
    • Mondaq United States
    • April 30, 2020
    ...employer compliance with the following provisions: 29 C.F.R. § 1904, Recording and Reporting Occupational Injuries and Illness; 29 C.F.R. § 1910.132, General Requirements - Personal Protective Equipment; 29 C.F.R. § 1910.133, Eye and Face Protection; 29 C.F.R. § 1910.134, Respiratory Protec......
  • Ebola: Legal Considerations for Health Care Employers
    • United States
    • JD Supra United States
    • October 21, 2014
    ...standards also may apply to potential Ebola exposure, including the Respiratory Protection Standard, 29 CFR 1910.134; the PPE Standard, 29 CFR 1910.132; the Hazard Communication Standard, 29 CFR 1910.1200; and others. OSHA’s catch-all “General Duty Clause” is a broad statutory (not regulato......
  • OSHA Guidance For COVID-19 Health and Safety Plans Required for Phased Reopenings of New York Businesses
    • United States
    • JD Supra United States
    • May 20, 2020
    ...engineering controls. Where such risks cannot be adequately managed through those controls, appropriate PPE must be implemented. See, 29 C.F.R. §§ 1910.132 and 1926.28 and Subpart Masks and PPE will surely be the prime and foremost top-of-mind consideration of employers. Ordinarily, the dec......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT