5 CFR 1320.5 - General requirements

Cite as5 CFR 1320.5
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
2712 practice notes
17 cases
  • H & L Axelsson, Inc. v. Pritzker, Civil Action No. 13–183 JBS/KMW.
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. 3th Circuit. United States District Courts. 3th Circuit. District of New Jersey
    • April 15, 2014
    ...issued by the OMB, signifying the OMB's approval of the agency's request to collect information. 44 U.S.C. §§ 3506(c)(1)(B) & 3512 ; 5 C.F.R. § 1320.5(b). To obtain OMB approval, an agency must demonstrate 16 F.Supp.3d 363that “it has taken every reasonable step to ensure that the proposed ......
  • H&L Axelsson, Inc. v. Pritzker, Civil Action No. 13–183 (JBS/KMW).
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. 3th Circuit. United States District Courts. 3th Circuit. District of New Jersey
    • April 15, 2014
    ...issued by the OMB, signifying the OMB's approval of the agency's request to collect information. 44 U.S.C. §§ 3506(c)(1)(B) & 3512; 5 C.F.R. § 1320.5(b). To obtain OMB approval, an agency must demonstrate [16 F.Supp.3d 363] that “it has taken every reasonable step to ensure that the propose......
  • Alegent Health-Immanuel Med. Ctr. v. Sebelius, Civil Case No. 12–812 RJL
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. United States District Court (Columbia)
    • March 31, 2014
    ...unless” it has conducted notice and comment rulemaking and received prior approval from OMB. See 44 U.S.C. §§ 3507(a) -(c) ; 5 C.F.R. § 1320.5(a)(2). The PRA further states, however, that “[t]he protection provided by this section may be raised in the form of a complete defense, bar, or oth......
  • Alegent Health-Immanuel Med. Ctr. v. Sebelius, Civil Case No. 12–812 (RJL)
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. United States District Court (Columbia)
    • March 31, 2014
    ...unless” it has conducted notice and comment rulemaking and received prior approval from OMB. See 44 U.S.C. §§ 3507(a)- (c); 5 C.F.R. § 1320.5(a)(2). The PRA further states, however, that “[t]he protection provided by this section may be raised in the form of a complete defense, bar, or othe......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
3 firm's commentaries
  • Opportunity to Reform Existing PTO Regulations and Ease Patent Application Paperwork Burden
    • United States
    • JD Supra United States
    • April 26, 2012
    ...10 http://www.reginfo.gov/public/do/PRAOMBHistory?ombControlNumber=0651-0064 11 44 U.S.C. § 3506(c)(3)(A) and 5 C.F.R. § 1320.5(d)(1)(i) ("To obtain OMB approval of a collection of information, an agency shall demonstrate that it has taken every reasonable step to ensure that the proposed c......
  • Did The CFPB Follow PRA Requirements In Issuing Its Big Tech Orders?
    • United States
    • Mondaq United States
    • November 23, 2021
    ...that agencies obtain Office of Management and Budget (OMB) approval before requesting most types of information from the public. See 5 C.F.R. 1320.5(a). As part of the general PRA review process, agencies must seek two rounds of public comment regarding a proposed information collection for......
  • Did The CFPB Follow PRA Requirements In Issuing Its Big Tech Orders?
    • United States
    • Mondaq United States
    • November 23, 2021
    ...that agencies obtain Office of Management and Budget (OMB) approval before requesting most types of information from the public. See 5 C.F.R. 1320.5(a). As part of the general PRA review process, agencies must seek two rounds of public comment regarding a proposed information collection for......
6 books & journal articles
  • When 30 Years of Practice Goes Against You: Patent Venue Ruling 'Ignores' Supreme Court Precedent
    • United States
    • Landslide Nbr. 10-5, May 2018
    • May 1, 2018
    ...the text of the statute but arises out of the interdependencies between required steps. 44 U.S.C. § 3507(a)(1)(D)(ii)(V), (d)(1)(A); 5 C.F.R. §§ 1320.5(a)(3), .8(a)(4), .11(b). The Rule Making Primer, supra note 2, at 56 n.43, notes several letters explaining the USPTO’s persistent neglect ......
  • Attorney-Client Privilege for In-House Counsel
    • United States
    • Landslide Nbr. 10-2, November 2017
    • November 1, 2017
    ...§ 3506(c)(1)(A); 5 C.F.R. § 1320.8(a)(1). 11. 44 U.S.C. § 3506(c)(3)(A); 5 C.F.R. §§ 1320.3(l), .9(a). 12. 44 U.S.C. § 3506(c)(3)(C); 5 C.F.R. §§ 1320.5(d)(1), .9(c). 13. 44 U.S.C. § 3506(c)(3)(D); 5 C.F.R. § 1320.9(d). 14. 44 U.S.C. § 3506(c)(3)(B); 5 C.F.R. § 1320.9(b). 15. 5 C.F.R. § 132......
  • The PTAB Is Not an Article III Court, Part 2: Aqua Products v. Matal as a Case Study in Administrative Law
    • United States
    • Landslide Nbr. 10-5, May 2018
    • May 1, 2018
    ...the text of the statute but arises out of the interdependencies between required steps. 44 U.S.C. § 3507(a)(1)(D)(ii)(V), (d)(1)(A); 5 C.F.R. §§ 1320.5(a)(3), .8(a)(4), .11(b). The Rule Making Primer, supra note 2, at 56 n.43, notes several letters explaining the USPTO’s persistent neglect ......
  • Printed Publications and Persons of Ordinary Skill: Did the PTAB in GoPro v. Contour IP Holding Apply an Overly Restrictive Standard?
    • United States
    • Landslide Nbr. 10-2, November 2017
    • November 1, 2017
    ...§ 3506(c)(1)(A); 5 C.F.R. § 1320.8(a)(1). 11. 44 U.S.C. § 3506(c)(3)(A); 5 C.F.R. §§ 1320.3(l), .9(a). 12. 44 U.S.C. § 3506(c)(3)(C); 5 C.F.R. §§ 1320.5(d)(1), .9(c). 13. 44 U.S.C. § 3506(c)(3)(D); 5 C.F.R. § 1320.9(d). 14. 44 U.S.C. § 3506(c)(3)(B); 5 C.F.R. § 1320.9(b). 15. 5 C.F.R. § 132......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT