5 CFR 1320.5 - General requirements

Cite as5 CFR 1320.5
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
2693 practice notes
  • Part II
    • United States
    • Federal Register September 30, 2009
    • September 30, 2009
    ...of the information collections are described below, along with an estimate of the annual reporting burden and cost as required by 5 CFR 1320.5(a)(1)(iv) and Title: Proposed Changes to the Hazard Communications Standard (Globally Harmonized System of Classification and Labeling of Chemicals ......
  • Clarification of Employer's Continuing Obligation To Make and Maintain an Accurate Record of Each Recordable Injury and Illness
    • United States
    • Federal Register December 19, 2016
    • December 19, 2016
    ...Review Under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 The Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (PRA) (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.) and OMB regulations (5 CFR part 1320) require agencies to obtain approval from OMB before conducting any collection of information. The PRA defines a ``collection of informati......
  • Standards Improvement Project-Phase IV
    • United States
    • Occupational Safety And Health Administration
    • Invalid date
    ...in response to the information collection requirements. C. Revisions to the Collection of Information Requirements As required by 5 CFR 1320.5(a)(1)(iv) and 1320.8(d)(2), the following paragraphs provide information about the ICRs, including the changes in burden associated with the revisio......
  • Exercise of Time-Limited Authority To Increase the Fiscal Year 2018 Numerical Limitation for the H-2B Temporary Nonagricultural Worker Program
    • United States
    • Federal Register May 31, 2018
    • May 31, 2018
    ...generally be subject to penalty for failing to comply with a collection of information that does not display a valid Control Number. See 5 CFR 1320.5(a) and 1320.6. DOL has submitted the Information Collection Request (ICR) contained in this rule to OMB and obtained approval using emergency......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
17 cases
  • H & L Axelsson, Inc. v. Pritzker, Civil Action No. 13–183 JBS/KMW.
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. 3th Circuit. United States District Courts. 3th Circuit. District of New Jersey
    • April 15, 2014
    ...issued by the OMB, signifying the OMB's approval of the agency's request to collect information. 44 U.S.C. §§ 3506(c)(1)(B) & 3512 ; 5 C.F.R. § 1320.5(b). To obtain OMB approval, an agency must demonstrate 16 F.Supp.3d 363that “it has taken every reasonable step to ensure that the proposed ......
  • H&L Axelsson, Inc. v. Pritzker, Civil Action No. 13–183 (JBS/KMW).
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. 3th Circuit. United States District Courts. 3th Circuit. District of New Jersey
    • April 15, 2014
    ...issued by the OMB, signifying the OMB's approval of the agency's request to collect information. 44 U.S.C. §§ 3506(c)(1)(B) & 3512; 5 C.F.R. § 1320.5(b). To obtain OMB approval, an agency must demonstrate [16 F.Supp.3d 363] that “it has taken every reasonable step to ensure that the propose......
  • Alegent Health-Immanuel Med. Ctr. v. Sebelius, Civil Case No. 12–812 RJL
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. United States District Court (Columbia)
    • March 31, 2014
    ...unless” it has conducted notice and comment rulemaking and received prior approval from OMB. See 44 U.S.C. §§ 3507(a) -(c) ; 5 C.F.R. § 1320.5(a)(2). The PRA further states, however, that “[t]he protection provided by this section may be raised in the form of a complete defense, bar, or oth......
  • Alegent Health-Immanuel Med. Ctr. v. Sebelius, Civil Case No. 12–812 (RJL)
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. United States District Court (Columbia)
    • March 31, 2014
    ...unless” it has conducted notice and comment rulemaking and received prior approval from OMB. See 44 U.S.C. §§ 3507(a)- (c); 5 C.F.R. § 1320.5(a)(2). The PRA further states, however, that “[t]he protection provided by this section may be raised in the form of a complete defense, bar, or othe......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
3 firm's commentaries
  • Opportunity to Reform Existing PTO Regulations and Ease Patent Application Paperwork Burden
    • United States
    • JD Supra United States
    • April 26, 2012
    ...10 http://www.reginfo.gov/public/do/PRAOMBHistory?ombControlNumber=0651-0064 11 44 U.S.C. § 3506(c)(3)(A) and 5 C.F.R. § 1320.5(d)(1)(i) ("To obtain OMB approval of a collection of information, an agency shall demonstrate that it has taken every reasonable step to ensure that the proposed c......
  • Did The CFPB Follow PRA Requirements In Issuing Its Big Tech Orders?
    • United States
    • Mondaq United States
    • November 23, 2021
    ...that agencies obtain Office of Management and Budget (OMB) approval before requesting most types of information from the public. See 5 C.F.R. 1320.5(a). As part of the general PRA review process, agencies must seek two rounds of public comment regarding a proposed information collection for......
  • Did The CFPB Follow PRA Requirements In Issuing Its Big Tech Orders?
    • United States
    • Mondaq United States
    • November 23, 2021
    ...that agencies obtain Office of Management and Budget (OMB) approval before requesting most types of information from the public. See 5 C.F.R. 1320.5(a). As part of the general PRA review process, agencies must seek two rounds of public comment regarding a proposed information collection for......
6 books & journal articles
  • When 30 Years of Practice Goes Against You: Patent Venue Ruling 'Ignores' Supreme Court Precedent
    • United States
    • Landslide Nbr. 10-5, May 2018
    • May 1, 2018
    ...the text of the statute but arises out of the interdependencies between required steps. 44 U.S.C. § 3507(a)(1)(D)(ii)(V), (d)(1)(A); 5 C.F.R. §§ 1320.5(a)(3), .8(a)(4), .11(b). The Rule Making Primer , supra note 2, at 56 n.43, notes several letters explaining the USPTO’s persistent neglect......
  • Attorney-Client Privilege for In-House Counsel
    • United States
    • Landslide Nbr. 10-2, November 2017
    • November 1, 2017
    ...3506(c)(1)(A); 5 C.F.R. § 1320.8(a)(1). 11. 44 U.S.C. § 3506(c)(3)(A); 5 C.F.R. §§ 1320.3( l ), .9(a). 12. 44 U.S.C. § 3506(c)(3)(C); 5 C.F.R. §§ 1320.5(d)(1), .9(c). 13. 44 U.S.C. § 3506(c)(3)(D); 5 C.F.R. § 1320.9(d). 14. 44 U.S.C. § 3506(c)(3)(B); 5 C.F.R. § 1320.9(b). 15. 5 C.F.R. § 132......
  • The PTAB Is Not an Article III Court, Part 2: Aqua Products v. Matal as a Case Study in Administrative Law
    • United States
    • Landslide Nbr. 10-5, May 2018
    • May 1, 2018
    ...the text of the statute but arises out of the interdependencies between required steps. 44 U.S.C. § 3507(a)(1)(D)(ii)(V), (d)(1)(A); 5 C.F.R. §§ 1320.5(a)(3), .8(a)(4), .11(b). The Rule Making Primer , supra note 2, at 56 n.43, notes several letters explaining the USPTO’s persistent neglect......
  • Printed Publications and Persons of Ordinary Skill: Did the PTAB in GoPro v. Contour IP Holding Apply an Overly Restrictive Standard?
    • United States
    • Landslide Nbr. 10-2, November 2017
    • November 1, 2017
    ...3506(c)(1)(A); 5 C.F.R. § 1320.8(a)(1). 11. 44 U.S.C. § 3506(c)(3)(A); 5 C.F.R. §§ 1320.3( l ), .9(a). 12. 44 U.S.C. § 3506(c)(3)(C); 5 C.F.R. §§ 1320.5(d)(1), .9(c). 13. 44 U.S.C. § 3506(c)(3)(D); 5 C.F.R. § 1320.9(d). 14. 44 U.S.C. § 3506(c)(3)(B); 5 C.F.R. § 1320.9(b). 15. 5 C.F.R. § 132......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT