29 CFR 1604.1 - General principles

Cite as29 CFR 1604.1
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
46 cases
  • Chrapliwy v. Uniroyal, Inc., Civ. No. 72 S 243.
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. 7th Circuit. United States District Court of Northern District of Indiana
    • May 31, 1977
    ...would be the case, for example, with the need for an actor or actress) the court must similarly reject defendant's contention. See, 29 C.F.R. § 1604.1(a). The Company's position is strengthened neither by the allegation that it did not intentionally discriminate on the basis of sex, Griggs ......
  • Aiello v. Hansen, No. C-72-1402 SW
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. 9th Circuit. United States District Courts. 9th Circuit. Northern District of California
    • May 31, 1973
    ...405 U.S. 645, 92 S.Ct. 1208, 31 L. Ed.2d 551 (1972); Heath v. Westerville Bd. of Educ., 345 F.Supp. 501, 506 (S. D.Ohio 1972); cf. 29 C.F.R. § 1604.1(a)(1)(ii). This slightly altered "rational basis" test is the standard the court applies in this case. The court agrees with plaintiffs' conc......
  • U.S. v. City of Miami, Fla., No. 77-1856
    • United States
    • United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (5th Circuit)
    • December 3, 1981
    ...origin in the assignment of employees in any department except as permitted by EEOC Guidelines on Discrimination Because of Sex, 29 C.F.R. §§ 1604.1 to .11 (1980), EEOC Guidelines on Discrimination Because of National Origin, id. § 1606.1, and the Office of Revenue Sharing, Department of th......
  • Novak v. Harris, No. 79 C 924.
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. 2nd Circuit. United States District Court (Eastern District of New York)
    • July 28, 1980
    ...with respect to veteran's preference); 42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq. and the Sex Discrimination Guidelines issued pursuant to Title VII, 29 C.F.R. §§ 1604.1-1604.10; 29 U.S.C. § 206(d); Toward Elimination of Sex-Based Differentials in the Social Security System, Statement of the U. S. Commissio......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
1 books & journal articles
  • 1976, March, Pg. 357. Sex Discrimination in Employment: Opening a Closed Door.
    • United States
    • Colorado Bar Journal Nbr. 1976, January 1976
    • January 1, 1976
    ...See discussion of bona fide occupational qualification as a defense. Guidelines on Discrimination Because of Sex, 29 C.F.R. §§ 1604.1-1604.10(1972). Phillips v. Martin Marietta Co., 400 U.S. 542 (1971). 29 C.F.R. § 1604.4(a) (1972). Sprogis v. United Airlines, Inc., 444 F.2d 1194 ......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT