49 C.F.R. §1180.1 - General policy statement for merger or control of at least two Class I railroads

Cite as49 C.F.R. §1180.1
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
7 cases
  • Lamoille Valley R. Co. v. I.C.C., s. 82-1498
    • United States
    • United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (District of Columbia)
    • 28 Junio 1983
    ...railroad mergers that improve efficiency and disfavor imposing conditions on a merger that might reduce potential efficiency gains. 49 C.F.R. § 1180.1 (1982); see Railroad Consolidation Procedures, 363 I.C.C. 200 (1981) (statement of basis and purpose). 7 In general, the Commission "encoura......
  • Western Resources, Inc. v. Surface Transp. Bd., s. 95-1435
    • United States
    • United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (District of Columbia)
    • 16 Mayo 1997
    ...and market capability that result from consolidation against any reduction in competition or harm to essential services. See 49 C.F.R. § 1180.1(c); Southern Pacific Transp. Co. v. ICC, 736 F.2d 708, 717 (D.C.Cir.1984). It also has the power to impose conditions upon proposed mergers to reme......
  • Kansas City Southern Industries, Inc. v. I.C.C., s. 88-4626
    • United States
    • United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (5th Circuit)
    • 7 Junio 1990
    ...Reviewing the merger applications in light of public interest considerations, see 49 U.S.C. Secs. 11344(b)(1), 11344(c); 49 C.F.R. Sec. 1180.1, the ICC ultimately approved Rio Grande's application and denied that of Kansas City Southern. See Rio Grande Indus.--Control--S. Pac. Transp. Co., ......
  • Western Coal Traffic League v. Surface Transp. Bd., 96-1373
    • United States
    • United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (District of Columbia)
    • 23 Marzo 1999
    ...the Board balances the gains in operating efficiency against any reduction in competition or harm to essential services. See 49 C.F.R. § 1180.1(c); Western Resources, 109 F.3d at 784; Southern Pac. Transp. Co. v. ICC, 736 F.2d 708, 717 The Board's balancing of the various competing interest......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
1 books & journal articles
  • Statutory Exemptions for Regulated Industries
    • United States
    • ABA Antitrust Library Handbook on the Scope of Antitrust Regulated industries and targeted exemptions
    • 1 Enero 2015
    ...Cir. 2000). The STB’s authority to institute the moratorium was upheld by the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals. Id. at 1176-77. 383. See 49 C.F.R. § 1180.1. 384. 49 C.F.R. § 1180.1(c). 385. Id. § 1180.1(c)(2)(i). 386. Id. 387. Id. § 1180.1(i). 388. Id. § 1180.1(d). Regulated Industries 339 the......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT