19 CFR 159.61 - General
| Cite as | 19 CFR 159.61 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
57 practice notes
-
Southern Shrimp Alliance v. U.S., Slip Op. 09-44. Court No. 08-00394.
...the petition with respect to which an antidumping duty order ... has been entered, and (B) remains in operation." Id. § 1675c(d)(1); 19 C.F.R. § 159.61(b). Using the ITC's list of ADPs, Customs publishes a notice of intent to distribute CDSOA funds along with the list of ADPs potentially el......
-
On Behalf Of All Others Similarly Situated v. United States, Slip Op. 10-96.
...producers (“ADPs”) under the CDSOA, as reimbursement for incurred qualifying expenditures. 19 U.S.C. § 1675c(e) (repealed 2006); 19 C.F.R. § 159.61 (2009). In the 2006 repeal of the CDSOA, Congress provided for the continued distribution of duties “on entries of goods made and filed before ......
-
Skf Usa v. U.S. Customs and Border Protection, No. 2008-1005.
...by acquiring a company that was on the original list or by waiving the confidentiality of their support of the original petition. See 19 C.F.R. § 159.61(b)(1)(i); Cathedral Candle v. U.S. Int'l Trade Comm'n, 400 F.3d 1352, 1358-59 (Fed.Cir.2005) (noting that producers were added to a Byrd A......
-
Canadian Lumber Trade Alliance v. U.S., Slip Op. 06-48. Court No. 05-00324.
...or countervailing duty order. The funds distributed, known as the "continued dumping and subsidy offset," 19 U.S.C. § 1675c(a); 19 C.F.R. § 159.61(a) ("Byrd Distributions"), are intended to strengthen trade law remedies, through an allocation based on "qualifying expenditures," i.e., certai......
Request a trial to view additional results
29 cases
-
Southern Shrimp Alliance v. U.S., Slip Op. 09-44. Court No. 08-00394.
...the petition with respect to which an antidumping duty order ... has been entered, and (B) remains in operation." Id. § 1675c(d)(1); 19 C.F.R. § 159.61(b). Using the ITC's list of ADPs, Customs publishes a notice of intent to distribute CDSOA funds along with the list of ADPs potentially el......
-
On Behalf Of All Others Similarly Situated v. United States, Slip Op. 10-96.
...producers (“ADPs”) under the CDSOA, as reimbursement for incurred qualifying expenditures. 19 U.S.C. § 1675c(e) (repealed 2006); 19 C.F.R. § 159.61 (2009). In the 2006 repeal of the CDSOA, Congress provided for the continued distribution of duties “on entries of goods made and filed before ......
-
Skf Usa v. U.S. Customs and Border Protection, No. 2008-1005.
...by acquiring a company that was on the original list or by waiving the confidentiality of their support of the original petition. See 19 C.F.R. § 159.61(b)(1)(i); Cathedral Candle v. U.S. Int'l Trade Comm'n, 400 F.3d 1352, 1358-59 (Fed.Cir.2005) (noting that producers were added to a Byrd A......
-
Canadian Lumber Trade Alliance v. U.S., Slip Op. 06-48. Court No. 05-00324.
...or countervailing duty order. The funds distributed, known as the "continued dumping and subsidy offset," 19 U.S.C. § 1675c(a); 19 C.F.R. § 159.61(a) ("Byrd Distributions"), are intended to strengthen trade law remedies, through an allocation based on "qualifying expenditures," i.e., certai......
Request a trial to view additional results