5 CFR 551.101 - General

Cite as5 CFR 551.101
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
14 practice notes
  • Abbey v. U. S., No. 07-272 C
    • United States
    • U.S. Claims Court
    • May 4, 2011
    ...1989). In addition, 5 C.F.R. § 551.511(b), which "supplements and interprets" 29 U.S.C. § 207(e) as it applies to FAA employees, see 5 C.F.R. § 551.101(b), excludes bonuses and discretionary payments from "total remuneration," 5 C.F.R. § 551.511(b). In particular, 5 C.F.R. § 551.511(b) prov......
  • Abbey v.The United States
    • United States
    • United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (District of Columbia)
    • May 4, 2011
    ...1989). In addition, 5 C.F.R. § 551.511(b), which "supplements and interprets" 29 U.S.C. § 207(e) as it applies to FAA employees, see 5 C.F.R. § 551.101(b), excludes bonuses and discretionary payments from "total remuneration," 5 C.F.R. § 551.511(b). In particular, 5 C.F.R. § 551.511(b) prov......
  • Shea v. United States, No. 16-793C
    • United States
    • Court of Federal Claims
    • May 31, 2019
    ...of Labor's administration of the Act only to the extent practicable and [if] consistency is required to maintain compliance." 5 C.F.R. § 551.101(c); see also Billings v. United States, 322 F.3d 1328, 1334 (Fed. Cir. 2003). OPM, however, considers its "executive, administrative, and professi......
  • U.S. Dept. of Air Force v. Federal Labor Relations Authority, No. 90-1530
    • United States
    • United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (District of Columbia)
    • February 26, 1992
    ..."minimum standards for ... overtime entitlement," and stated that the OPM regulations "must be read in conjunction with [the Act]." 5 C.F.R. § 551.101(b) & We do not find either of the justifications for ignoring the plain words of the regulation at all convincing. Of course, these regulati......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
14 cases
  • Abbey v. U. S., No. 07-272 C
    • United States
    • U.S. Claims Court
    • May 4, 2011
    ...1989). In addition, 5 C.F.R. § 551.511(b), which "supplements and interprets" 29 U.S.C. § 207(e) as it applies to FAA employees, see 5 C.F.R. § 551.101(b), excludes bonuses and discretionary payments from "total remuneration," 5 C.F.R. § 551.511(b). In particular, 5 C.F.R. § 551.511(b) prov......
  • Abbey v.The United States
    • United States
    • United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (District of Columbia)
    • May 4, 2011
    ...1989). In addition, 5 C.F.R. § 551.511(b), which "supplements and interprets" 29 U.S.C. § 207(e) as it applies to FAA employees, see 5 C.F.R. § 551.101(b), excludes bonuses and discretionary payments from "total remuneration," 5 C.F.R. § 551.511(b). In particular, 5 C.F.R. § 551.511(b) prov......
  • Shea v. United States, No. 16-793C
    • United States
    • Court of Federal Claims
    • May 31, 2019
    ...of Labor's administration of the Act only to the extent practicable and [if] consistency is required to maintain compliance." 5 C.F.R. § 551.101(c); see also Billings v. United States, 322 F.3d 1328, 1334 (Fed. Cir. 2003). OPM, however, considers its "executive, administrative, and professi......
  • U.S. Dept. of Air Force v. Federal Labor Relations Authority, No. 90-1530
    • United States
    • United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (District of Columbia)
    • February 26, 1992
    ..."minimum standards for ... overtime entitlement," and stated that the OPM regulations "must be read in conjunction with [the Act]." 5 C.F.R. § 551.101(b) & We do not find either of the justifications for ignoring the plain words of the regulation at all convincing. Of course, these regulati......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT