8 CFR 1003.5 - Forwarding of record on appeal

Cite as8 CFR 1003.5
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
20 practice notes
  • Appellate Procedures and Decisional Finality in Immigration Proceedings; Administrative Closure
    • United States
    • Executive Office For Immigration Review
    • Invalid date
    ...--------------------------------------------------------------------------- 12. Forwarding the Record on Appeal The rule revises 8 CFR 1003.5(a) regarding the forwarding of the record of proceedings in an appeal to ensure that the transcription process and the forwarding of records do not c......
  • Executive Office for Immigration Review: Custody determinations review,
    • United States
    • Federal Register October 02, 2006
    • 2 October 2006
    ...of the record of proceedings and the 21-day period for the filing of simultaneous briefs in appeals involving detained aliens. See 8 CFR 1003.5(a), 1003.3(c)(1). In the past, the Board has been able to issue a decision within a 90-day time frame in most automatic stay cases, and the Departm......
  • Centro Legal De La Raza v. Exec. Office for Immigration Review, Case No. 21-cv-00463-SI
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. 9th Circuit. United States District Courts. 9th Circuit. Northern District of California
    • 10 March 2021
    ...of an oral decision to correct mis-transcribed language or other errors before it is sent to the parties. 85 Fed. Reg. at 81,638; 8 C.F.R. § 1003.5 (2021). Plaintiffs claim that "these arbitrary adjudication timelines pressure[] screeners to review cases quickly rather than thoroughly" and ......
  • Centro Legal De La Raza v. Exec. Office for Immigration Review, Case No. 21-cv-00463-SI
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. 9th Circuit. United States District Courts. 9th Circuit. Northern District of California
    • 10 March 2021
    ...of an oral decision to correct mis-transcribed language or other errors before it is sent to the parties. 85 Fed. Reg. at 81,638 ; 8 C.F.R. § 1003.5 (2021).Plaintiffs claim that "these arbitrary adjudication timelines pressure[ ] screeners to review cases quickly rather than thoroughly" and......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
17 cases
  • Centro Legal De La Raza v. Exec. Office for Immigration Review, Case No. 21-cv-00463-SI
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. 9th Circuit. United States District Courts. 9th Circuit. Northern District of California
    • 10 March 2021
    ...of an oral decision to correct mis-transcribed language or other errors before it is sent to the parties. 85 Fed. Reg. at 81,638 ; 8 C.F.R. § 1003.5 (2021).Plaintiffs claim that "these arbitrary adjudication timelines pressure[ ] screeners to review cases quickly rather than thoroughly" and......
  • Centro Legal De La Raza v. Exec. Office for Immigration Review, Case No. 21-cv-00463-SI
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. 9th Circuit. United States District Courts. 9th Circuit. Northern District of California
    • 10 March 2021
    ...of an oral decision to correct mis-transcribed language or other errors before it is sent to the parties. 85 Fed. Reg. at 81,638; 8 C.F.R. § 1003.5 (2021). Plaintiffs claim that "these arbitrary adjudication timelines pressure[] screeners to review cases quickly rather than thoroughly" and ......
  • Shewchun v. Holder, No. 09–3894.
    • United States
    • United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (6th Circuit)
    • 26 October 2011
    ...approved, edited, and signed copy of the transcript of the IJ's oral decision. He correctly points out the general rule set forth in 8 C.F.R. § 1003.5(a) that “[w]here transcription of an oral decision is required, the immigration judge shall review the transcript and approve the decision w......
  • Shewchun v. Holder, No. 09-3894
    • United States
    • United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (6th Circuit)
    • 8 September 2011
    ...approved, edited, and signed copy of the transcript of the IJ's oral decision. He correctly points out the general rule set forth in 8 C.F.R. § 1003.5(a) that "[w]here transcription of an oral decision is required, the immigrationPage 18judge shall review the transcript and approve the deci......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT