8 C.F.R. §1003.25 - Form of the proceeding
| Cite as | 8 C.F.R. §1003.25 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
62 cases
-
U.S. v. Soto-Castelo, Case No. 2:08-cr-00157-ECR-GWF.
...a conclusive determination of the alien's removability from the United States. The regulation adopted pursuant to this statute, 8 C.F.R. § 1003.25(b), provides, in part, as An Immigration Judge may enter an order of deportation, exclusion or removal stipulated to by the alien (or the alien'......
-
Angov v. Lynch, 07–74963.
...law specifically allows IJs to conduct entire hearings via telephone or video conference. 8 U.S.C. § 1229a(b)(2)(A) ; see also 8 C.F.R. § 1003.25(c) (“An Immigration Judge may conduct hearings through video conference to the same extent as he or she may conduct hearings in person.”).Because......
-
United States v. Gomez, 11–30262.
...right to due process because he was denied his right to appeal the removal order, and (2) the Immigration Judge (“IJ”) violated 8 C.F.R. § 1003.25(b) by finding Gomez's waiver of rights “voluntary, knowing, and intelligent” on the basis of an insufficient record. Nonetheless, we affirm Gome......
-
United States v. Gomez, 11–30262.
...right to due process because he was denied his right to appeal the removal order, and (2) the Immigration Judge (“IJ”) violated 8 C.F.R. § 1003.25(b) by finding Gomez's waiver of rights “voluntary, knowing, and intelligent” on the basis of an insufficient record. Nonetheless, we affirm Gome......
Request a trial to view additional results