19 CFR 171.31 - Form of offers
| Cite as | 19 CFR 171.31 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
5 practice notes
-
Lee v. Thornton, Civ. A. No. 6451
...determined that the act or omission forming the basis of a penalty or forfeiture claim did not in fact occur . . .." 19 C.F.R. §§ 171.21, 171.31. After seizure the property is appraised. 19 U.S.C. § 1606; 19 C.F.R. § 162.43. The appraised value is important because it determines the manner ......
-
US v. UPS Customhouse Brokerage, Inc., Slip Op. 10-11. Court No. 04-00650.
...customs officer" is usually the Fines, Penalties, and Forfeitures Officer ("FP & F Officer") for the relevant port. See 19 C.F.R. §§ 111.94, 171.31.2 The trial record establishes that the FP & F Officer required to consider the ten factors in imposing the penalties at issue was Mr. Bert Web......
-
Ashh, Inc. v. United States, 21-11210
...other major option included the opportunity to submit an offer in compromise to CBP pursuant to 19 U.S.C. § 1617 and 19 C.F.R. §§ 161.5, 171.31. [3] Since the filing of Plaintiff's complaint, the products seized on April 13 have been administratively forfeited. Although Plaintiff alleged no......
-
United States v. Carrizoza, CR 14-02095-TUC-RCC(EJM)
...Second, at any time prior to forfeiture, a claimant may make an "Offer in Compromise" under 19 U.S.C. § 1617 and 19 C.F.R. §§ 161.5 and 171.31. If the claimant offers money in settlement of the case, the offered payment must be sent to CBP at the time of the offer (and would be returned if ......
Request a trial to view additional results
4 cases
-
Lee v. Thornton, Civ. A. No. 6451
...determined that the act or omission forming the basis of a penalty or forfeiture claim did not in fact occur . . .." 19 C.F.R. §§ 171.21, 171.31. After seizure the property is appraised. 19 U.S.C. § 1606; 19 C.F.R. § 162.43. The appraised value is important because it determines the manner ......
-
US v. UPS Customhouse Brokerage, Inc., Slip Op. 10-11. Court No. 04-00650.
...customs officer" is usually the Fines, Penalties, and Forfeitures Officer ("FP & F Officer") for the relevant port. See 19 C.F.R. §§ 111.94, 171.31.2 The trial record establishes that the FP & F Officer required to consider the ten factors in imposing the penalties at issue was Mr. Bert Web......
-
Ashh, Inc. v. United States, 21-11210
...other major option included the opportunity to submit an offer in compromise to CBP pursuant to 19 U.S.C. § 1617 and 19 C.F.R. §§ 161.5, 171.31. [3] Since the filing of Plaintiff's complaint, the products seized on April 13 have been administratively forfeited. Although Plaintiff alleged no......
-
United States v. Carrizoza, CR 14-02095-TUC-RCC(EJM)
...Second, at any time prior to forfeiture, a claimant may make an "Offer in Compromise" under 19 U.S.C. § 1617 and 19 C.F.R. §§ 161.5 and 171.31. If the claimant offers money in settlement of the case, the offered payment must be sent to CBP at the time of the offer (and would be returned if ......