21 CFR 101.22 - Foods; labeling of spices, flavorings, colorings and chemical preservatives

Cite as21 CFR 101.22
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
170 practice notes
  • Bruton v. Gerber Prods. Co., Case No.: 12–CV–02412–LHK
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. 9th Circuit. United States District Courts. 9th Circuit. Eastern District of California
    • 6 Septiembre 2013
    ...identified by Bruton, including the following: “nutrient content” claims, 21 U.S.C. § 343(r)(1)(A); the FDA's “natural” policy, see21 C.F.R. § 101.22; 58 Fed. Reg. at 2407; the “health” claims, see21 C.F.R. § 101.14; and the “sugar-related” claims, see21 C.F.R. § 101.60. According to Defend......
  • Viggiano v. Hansen Natural Corp., Case No. CV 12–10747 MMM (JCGx).
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. 9th Circuit. United States District Courts. 9th Circuit. Central District of California
    • 13 Mayo 2013
    ...§ 343(k). Pursuant to this statute, the FDA has promulgated regulations that expressly govern the use of a “natural flavor” label. 21 C.F.R. § 101.22(i)(1) provides that a manufacturer can use a “natural flavor” label on a product even if the product contains artificial, non-flavoring ingre......
  • In re Conagra Foods Inc., Case No. CV 11–05379 MMM (AGRx).
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. 9th Circuit. United States District Courts. 9th Circuit. Central District of California
    • 15 Noviembre 2012
    ...product “low sodium”); 21 C.F.R § 101.14 (health claims). Indeed, as ConAgra notes, 38 the FDA has regulated use of the term “natural.” 21 C.F.R § 101.22.39 While, as explained in the court's order in Briseno,40 these FDA regulations do not preempt plaintiffs' claims, the exception to the N......
  • Garcia v. Kashi Co., Case No. 12–21678–CIV.
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. 11th Circuit. United States District Courts. 11th Circuit. Southern District of Florida
    • 5 Septiembre 2014
    ...[.]’ ” Id. at *3 (quoting Dvora v. Gen. Mills, Inc., No. CV 11–1074–GW(PLAx), 2011 WL 1897349, at *4 (C.D.Cal. May 16, 2011) (citing 21 C.F.R. §§ 101.22(i), 101.22(i)(1)(i); 101.22(i)(1)(ii))). Next, the court found that the third claim was preempted because FDA regulations permit the use o......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
127 cases
  • Bruton v. Gerber Prods. Co., Case No.: 12–CV–02412–LHK
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. 9th Circuit. United States District Courts. 9th Circuit. Eastern District of California
    • 6 Septiembre 2013
    ...identified by Bruton, including the following: “nutrient content” claims, 21 U.S.C. § 343(r)(1)(A); the FDA's “natural” policy, see21 C.F.R. § 101.22; 58 Fed. Reg. at 2407; the “health” claims, see21 C.F.R. § 101.14; and the “sugar-related” claims, see21 C.F.R. § 101.60. According to Defend......
  • Viggiano v. Hansen Natural Corp., Case No. CV 12–10747 MMM (JCGx).
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. 9th Circuit. United States District Courts. 9th Circuit. Central District of California
    • 13 Mayo 2013
    ...§ 343(k). Pursuant to this statute, the FDA has promulgated regulations that expressly govern the use of a “natural flavor” label. 21 C.F.R. § 101.22(i)(1) provides that a manufacturer can use a “natural flavor” label on a product even if the product contains artificial, non-flavoring ingre......
  • In re Conagra Foods Inc., Case No. CV 11–05379 MMM (AGRx).
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. 9th Circuit. United States District Courts. 9th Circuit. Central District of California
    • 15 Noviembre 2012
    ...product “low sodium”); 21 C.F.R § 101.14 (health claims). Indeed, as ConAgra notes, 38 the FDA has regulated use of the term “natural.” 21 C.F.R § 101.22.39 While, as explained in the court's order in Briseno,40 these FDA regulations do not preempt plaintiffs' claims, the exception to the N......
  • Garcia v. Kashi Co., Case No. 12–21678–CIV.
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. 11th Circuit. United States District Courts. 11th Circuit. Southern District of Florida
    • 5 Septiembre 2014
    ...[.]’ ” Id. at *3 (quoting Dvora v. Gen. Mills, Inc., No. CV 11–1074–GW(PLAx), 2011 WL 1897349, at *4 (C.D.Cal. May 16, 2011) (citing 21 C.F.R. §§ 101.22(i), 101.22(i)(1)(i); 101.22(i)(1)(ii))). Next, the court found that the third claim was preempted because FDA regulations permit the use o......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
27 firm's commentaries
  • FDA warns fresh fruit company, seasoning firm about serious violations
    • United States
    • LexBlog United States
    • 20 Enero 2020
    ...preservative and the term “anticompactante” (anticaking) refers to the ingredient’s function, it must be labeled in accordance with 21 CFR Part 101.22(j). Additionally, your Tugusto Chef Sazón con Culantro y Achiote product is manufactured using (redacted) however, it fails to list the sub-......
  • Mislabeling Allegations Stick to Post’s “Honey Bunches of Oats,” But Not Without Creating a Buzz
    • United States
    • JD Supra United States
    • 13 Mayo 2020
    ...issued regulations directed to specific labeling issues, including representations of a food product’s “primary recognizable flavor.” 21 C.F.R. §§ 101.22(a)(3), 170.3(o)(12). So long as a label’s representation of a “primary recognizable flavor” complies with the FDA’s flavoring regulation,......
  • Canada Dry Ginger Ale's Marketing Campaign Fizzles In Labeling Litigation
    • United States
    • JD Supra United States
    • 6 Agosto 2018
    ...statements, as opposed to generalized or vague statements). Fitzhenry, 2017 WL 4224723, at *7. Id. Id. Id. at *8. Id. at *8; see also 21 C.F.R. § 101.22. Ivie v. Kraft Foods Global, Inc., 961 F. Supp. 2d 1033, 1038 (N.D. Cal. Sciortino v. Pepsico, Inc., 108 F. Supp. 3d 780, 790 (N.D. Cal. 2......
  • New Flavor of Labeling Lawsuits: Plaintiffs Allege False Vanilla Claims
    • United States
    • JD Supra United States
    • 1 Agosto 2019
    ...21 C.F.R. § 101.4(b)(1) provides that spices or flavoring “shall be declared according to the provisions of § 101.22.” And under 21 C.F.R. § 101.22(h)(1), any natural flavor added to a food may simply be declared as a “natural flavor” on the label’s statement of Those regulations may well h......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
2 books & journal articles
  • WEIRD SCIENCE: FRANKENSTEIN FOODS AND STATES AS LABORATORIES OF DEMOCRACY.
    • United States
    • Journal of Law and Health Vol. 30 Nbr. 1, March 2017
    • 22 Marzo 2017
    ...if: (1) The product does not contain any artificial flavor or flavoring, coloring ingredient, or chemical preservative (as defined in 21 CFR 101.22), or any other artificial or synthetic ingredient; and (2) the product and its ingredients are not more than minimally processed."). (170) See,......
  • Not 'All Natural': Modernizing Privity to Allow Breach of Contract Claims for Mislabeled Food Products
    • United States
    • Iowa Law Review Nbr. 103-2, January 2018
    • 1 Enero 2018
    ...Request for Information and Comments]. The second comment period closed on May 10, 2016. Extension of Comment Period, supra. 15. 21 C.F.R. § 101.22(a)(1) (2017); 21 C.F.R. § 101.22(a)(3) (2017). 16. Storrs, supra note 3 (citing Warning Letter from Roberta F. Wagner, Dir., Office of Complian......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT