16 C.F.R. § 310.8 - Fee for access to the National Do Not Call Registry

Cite as16 C.F.R. § 310.8
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
37 practice notes
  • Telemarketing Sales Rule
    • United States
    • Federal Register December 14, 2015
    • December 14, 2015
    ...from the business itself, and not to calls inducing sales or contributions from individuals employed by the business; (4) that under 16 CFR 310.8(c) no person can participate in an arrangement to share the cost of accessing the National Do Not Call Registry; and (5) provide examples of the ......
  • Part II
    • United States
    • Federal Register November 24, 2008
    • November 24, 2008
    ...Rules adopted pursuant to the provisions of the Telemarketing Sales Act, which prohibit calls to persons listed on the Do-Not-Call list (16 CFR 310); Rules Implementing the CAN-SPAM Act of 2003 (16 CFR 316) regarding sending unsolicited e- mails; Trade Regulation Rules adopted pursuant to t......
  • Mainstream Marketing Services, Inc. v. F.T.C., No. 03-1429.
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Tenth Circuit
    • February 17, 2004
    ...of data, except that the first five area codes are provided free of Page 1247 charge and the maximum annual fee is capped at $7,375. 16 C.F.R. § 310.8(c). The telemarketers argue that this fee unconstitutionally imposes a revenue tax on protected speech. We It is well-established that the F......
  • Fed. Trade Comm'n v. Lanier Law, LLC, Case No. 3:14-cv-786-J-34PDB
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. 11th Circuit. United States District Court of Middle District of Florida
    • July 7, 2016
    ...of § 1015.7(a) before he can be exempt from the Advance Fee Prohibition).D. Counts VI & VII–Telemarketing Sales Rule, 16 C.F.R. §§ 310.4, 310.8 In Count VI of the Amended Complaint, the FTC alleges that the Lanier Defendants violated 16 C.F.R. § 310.4(b)(1)(iii)(B) by initiating or causing ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
26 cases
  • Mainstream Marketing Services, Inc. v. F.T.C., No. 03-1429.
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Tenth Circuit
    • February 17, 2004
    ...of data, except that the first five area codes are provided free of Page 1247 charge and the maximum annual fee is capped at $7,375. 16 C.F.R. § 310.8(c). The telemarketers argue that this fee unconstitutionally imposes a revenue tax on protected speech. We It is well-established that the F......
  • Fed. Trade Comm'n v. Lanier Law, LLC, Case No. 3:14-cv-786-J-34PDB
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. 11th Circuit. United States District Court of Middle District of Florida
    • July 7, 2016
    ...of § 1015.7(a) before he can be exempt from the Advance Fee Prohibition).D. Counts VI & VII–Telemarketing Sales Rule, 16 C.F.R. §§ 310.4, 310.8 In Count VI of the Amended Complaint, the FTC alleges that the Lanier Defendants violated 16 C.F.R. § 310.4(b)(1)(iii)(B) by initiating or causing ......
  • Mainstream Marketing Services, Inc. v. Federal Trade Commission, No. 03-1429 (Fed. 10th Cir. 2/18/2004), No. 03-1429.
    • United States
    • United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (10th Circuit)
    • February 18, 2004
    ...area code of data, except that the first five area codes are provided free of charge and the maximum annual fee is capped at $7,375. 16 C.F.R. § 310.8(c). The telemarketers argue that this fee unconstitutionally imposes a revenue tax on protected speech. We It is well-established that the F......
  • Mainstream Marketing Services, Inc. v. F.T.C., No. CIV. A. 03 N 0184.
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. 10th Circuit. United States District Court of Colorado
    • September 25, 2003
    ...FTC promulgated its final rule concerning the fees imposed on entities accessing the national do-not-call registry, to be codified at 16 C.F.R. § 310.8 (2003). 68 Fed.Reg. 45134 (July 31, 2003). These new fee Rules provide that any seller wishing to initiate, or cause any telemarketer to in......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
11 provisions
  • Telemarketing Sales Rule
    • United States
    • Federal Register December 14, 2015
    • December 14, 2015
    ...from the business itself, and not to calls inducing sales or contributions from individuals employed by the business; (4) that under 16 CFR 310.8(c) no person can participate in an arrangement to share the cost of accessing the National Do Not Call Registry; and (5) provide examples of the ......
  • Part II
    • United States
    • Federal Register November 24, 2008
    • November 24, 2008
    ...Rules adopted pursuant to the provisions of the Telemarketing Sales Act, which prohibit calls to persons listed on the Do-Not-Call list (16 CFR 310); Rules Implementing the CAN-SPAM Act of 2003 (16 CFR 316) regarding sending unsolicited e- mails; Trade Regulation Rules adopted pursuant to t......
  • Telemarketing Sales Rule
    • United States
    • Federal Register July 09, 2013
    • July 9, 2013
    ...them from sharing the cost of Registry access.\193\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \193\ 16 CFR 310.8(c). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- The Commission adopted this prohibition to conform the TSR's fee......
  • Trade regulation rules: Franchising; disclosure requirements and prohibitions,
    • United States
    • Federal Register October 22, 1999
    • October 22, 1999
    ...Rule Pursuant to the Telephone Disclosure and Dispute Act of 1992 (``900 Number Rule''), 16 CFR 308 at 308.3(b); Telemarketing Sales Rule, 16 CFR 310 at Sec. 310.3; Funeral Industry Practices Rule, 16 CFR 453 at \118\ In response to the ANPR, no commenter raised any concerns about UFOC Item......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT