16 C.F.R. § 310.8 - Fee for access to the National Do Not Call Registry
| Cite as | 16 C.F.R. § 310.8 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
37 practice notes
-
Part II
...Rules adopted pursuant to the provisions of the Telemarketing Sales Act, which prohibit calls to persons listed on the Do-Not-Call list (16 CFR 310); Rules Implementing the CAN-SPAM Act of 2003 (16 CFR 316) regarding sending unsolicited e- mails; Trade Regulation Rules adopted pursuant to t......
-
Telemarketing Sales Rule
...from the business itself, and not to calls inducing sales or contributions from individuals employed by the business; (4) that under 16 CFR 310.8(c) no person can participate in an arrangement to share the cost of accessing the National Do Not Call Registry; and (5) provide examples of the ......
-
Mainstream Marketing Services, Inc. v. F.T.C., No. 03-1429.
...of data, except that the first five area codes are provided free of Page 1247 charge and the maximum annual fee is capped at $7,375. 16 C.F.R. § 310.8(c). The telemarketers argue that this fee unconstitutionally imposes a revenue tax on protected speech. We It is well-established that the F......
-
Fed. Trade Comm'n v. Lanier Law, LLC, Case No. 3:14-cv-786-J-34PDB
...of § 1015.7(a) before he can be exempt from the Advance Fee Prohibition).D. Counts VI & VII–Telemarketing Sales Rule, 16 C.F.R. §§ 310.4, 310.8 In Count VI of the Amended Complaint, the FTC alleges that the Lanier Defendants violated 16 C.F.R. § 310.4(b)(1)(iii)(B) by initiating or causing ......
Request a trial to view additional results
26 cases
-
Mainstream Marketing Services, Inc. v. F.T.C., No. 03-1429.
...of data, except that the first five area codes are provided free of Page 1247 charge and the maximum annual fee is capped at $7,375. 16 C.F.R. § 310.8(c). The telemarketers argue that this fee unconstitutionally imposes a revenue tax on protected speech. We It is well-established that the F......
-
Fed. Trade Comm'n v. Lanier Law, LLC, Case No. 3:14-cv-786-J-34PDB
...of § 1015.7(a) before he can be exempt from the Advance Fee Prohibition).D. Counts VI & VII–Telemarketing Sales Rule, 16 C.F.R. §§ 310.4, 310.8 In Count VI of the Amended Complaint, the FTC alleges that the Lanier Defendants violated 16 C.F.R. § 310.4(b)(1)(iii)(B) by initiating or causing ......
-
Mainstream Marketing Services, Inc. v. Federal Trade Commission, No. 03-1429 (Fed. 10th Cir. 2/18/2004), No. 03-1429.
...area code of data, except that the first five area codes are provided free of charge and the maximum annual fee is capped at $7,375. 16 C.F.R. § 310.8(c). The telemarketers argue that this fee unconstitutionally imposes a revenue tax on protected speech. We It is well-established that the F......
-
Mainstream Marketing Services, Inc. v. F.T.C., No. CIV. A. 03 N 0184.
...FTC promulgated its final rule concerning the fees imposed on entities accessing the national do-not-call registry, to be codified at 16 C.F.R. § 310.8 (2003). 68 Fed.Reg. 45134 (July 31, 2003). These new fee Rules provide that any seller wishing to initiate, or cause any telemarketer to in......
Request a trial to view additional results