2 C.F.R. § 200.205 - Federal awarding agency review of risk posed by applicants
Cite as | 2 C.F.R. § 200.205 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
2 cases
-
Nat'l Fed'n of the Blind v. U.S. Abilityone Comm'n, Case No.: GJH-18-2965
...UAR fare no better. Plaintiff alleges that with the designation and July 2018 Agreement, Defendants violated 2 C.F.R. §§ 200.203, 200.204, 200.205(b), and 200.211(a). ECF No. 2 ¶¶ 85–89. These provisions of the UAR are contained in a subpart titled Pre-Federal Award Requirements and Content......
-
Hous. Auth. of Slidell v. United States, 19-1583C
...explain the mechanics of such withholding.59 During oral argument, counsel of record for the government retreated to relying upon only 2 C.F.R. §§ 200.205, 200.207, and 200.338.60 Putting aside the question of whether those regulatory provisions were incorporated into the HACS ACC,61 the go......
2 firm's commentaries
-
OMB Issues Additional Guidance to Grant Recipients
...specifically required. As outlined this guidance from OMB, the following exceptions are available. Flexibility with SAM registration. (2 C.F.R. § 200.205) To expedite the issuance of funding, awarding agencies do not have to require an active System for Award Management (SAM) registration a......
-
COVID-19: Government Contracts, Small Businesses and European Travel Restrictions -- Assessing the White House’s Response
...the requirement that at the time of making an offer, a contractor must have an active SAM registration. However, the requirements of 2 C.F.R. § 200.205 detailing how agencies must review risks posed by offerors continues to fully b. Exception #3: Pre-award costs. Awarding agencies may allow......