17 CFR 240.14a-9 - False or misleading statements

Cite as17 CFR 240.14a-9
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
565 practice notes
  • Securities: Takeovers and security holder communications; regulation modernization,
    • United States
    • Federal Register December 04, 1998
    • 4 Diciembre 1998
    ...securities laws. See Securities Act Section 17 [15 U.S.C. 77q]; Exchange Act Section 10(b) [15 U.S.C. 77j(b)]; Rule 10b-5, Rule 14a-9 [17 CFR 240.14a-9], and Exchange Act Section 14(e) and the rules under that The following summarizes the regulatory process for the four basic business combi......
  • Securities: Shareholders proposals,
    • United States
    • Federal Register May 28, 1998
    • 28 Mayo 1998
    ...From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov] [DOCID:fr28my98-12] SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION 17 CFR Part 240 [Release No. 34-40018; IC-23200; File No. RIN 3235-AH20 Amendments To Rules On Shareholder Proposals AGENCY: Securities and Exchange Commission. ACTIO......
  • Cowin v. Bresler, No. 83-1597
    • United States
    • United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (District of Columbia)
    • 7 Agosto 1984
    ...in the years 1974 through 1979 in violation of section 14(a) of the 1934 Act, 15 U.S.C. Sec. 78n(a) (1982), and Rule 14a-9, 17 C.F.R. Sec. 240.14a-9 (1983). He claims these statements artificially depressed the value of company stock by limiting the public trading market in those shares and......
  • Burt v. Maasberg, Civil Action No.: ELH-12-0464
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. 4th Circuit. United States District Court (Maryland)
    • 28 Marzo 2014
    ...of any security (other than an exempted security) registered pursuant to section 781 of this title.Page 47 Rule 14a-9, codified at 17 C.F.R. § 240.14a-9(a), applies to misrepresentations or omissions in proxy statements. It provides, id.:No solicitation subject to this regulation shall be m......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
519 cases
  • Cowin v. Bresler, No. 83-1597
    • United States
    • United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (District of Columbia)
    • 7 Agosto 1984
    ...in the years 1974 through 1979 in violation of section 14(a) of the 1934 Act, 15 U.S.C. Sec. 78n(a) (1982), and Rule 14a-9, 17 C.F.R. Sec. 240.14a-9 (1983). He claims these statements artificially depressed the value of company stock by limiting the public trading market in those shares and......
  • Burt v. Maasberg, Civil Action No.: ELH-12-0464
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. 4th Circuit. United States District Court (Maryland)
    • 28 Marzo 2014
    ...of any security (other than an exempted security) registered pursuant to section 781 of this title.Page 47 Rule 14a-9, codified at 17 C.F.R. § 240.14a-9(a), applies to misrepresentations or omissions in proxy statements. It provides, id.:No solicitation subject to this regulation shall be m......
  • Gaines v. Haughton, Nos. 79-3336
    • United States
    • United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (9th Circuit)
    • 10 Julio 1981
    ...(other than an exempted security) registered pursuant to section 78l of this title. (Emphasis added.) The pertinent SEC regulation, 17 C.F.R. § 240.14a-9 (1980), (a) No solicitation subject to this regulation shall be made by means of any proxy statement, form of proxy, notice of meeting or......
  • Roberts v. Magnetic Metals Co., No. 79-1326
    • United States
    • United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (3rd Circuit)
    • 14 Noviembre 1979
    ...Securities Exchange Act of 1934, 15 U.S.C. §§ 78j(b), 78n(a) (1976), Rules 10b-5 and 14a-9 promulgated thereunder, 17 C.F.R. §§ 240.10b-5, 240.14a-9 (1978), and common law fraud. The transaction complained of is a merger of Magnetic, a New Jersey corporation, into Magmetco, a Pennsylvania c......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
13 firm's commentaries

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT